Redknapp to Leicester City rumour AGAIN!

[Happy Fox]

If this happens then King Power need to get the fvck out the club immediately, I don't buy into them at all now.

We'd again be the laughing stock and I'm sick to fvcking death of it.

Over reactionary? who would buy the club not with the level of debt we have atm, we are stuck with the Thais and the decisions they make unless we are in the shitter i.e administration than they will remain here.

[paulsherwood1]

Its a topic that seriously divides our support. The Pearson supporters are vociferous in shouting down anyone who dare mention anything against him, labelling them `Haters`. I hope I remain pragmatic about it, and just like 3 defeats should not be judged, neither should 3 wins in a row.

This season we have shown real promise, even in the away defeats our footbal has been good. I am quite surprised that Pearson has gone for a more attacking style rather than what he did at Hull City.

My concerns over his ability to manage us, is purely based on the following.

* Never been promoted from the Championship

* Very slow progress at LCFC, its taken a year to get to where we are now.

* Did nothing at Hull City

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way.

* Appalling attitude when interviewed

* rumours of unhapiness in the camp

* Falling attendances due to no improvement in the team.

For keeping him:

* Consistency

* the team is showing signs of improvement

* Change is rarely good in football

However, Football is not just a results business. Unless anyone on here is truly in the know, then none of us know about how he is to work for, and other stuff that goes on. I say this because I used to work for a VERY successful company, turning over millions of pounds profit, however the boss was a fruitcake, and pure evil. The staff turnover was massive, he was arrogant enough to think that good people will always be available, he didnt care about them, the morale was appalling. Yet from the outside the company was a shining light, he looked like a star. Just saying, we dont know it all.

Also remembering the furour when Mike Ashley made a great Business decision and binned the popular Hughton. What a great decision! He knew his people. Look at Blackburn, Steve Kean was hated by all, and eventually resigned when his team were at the top of the league with a new 8 million hitman just signed!

We need to trust the Thai`s, if they think that sticking with Pearson is right, and he continues to deliver, and he is managing morale correctly, then he gets my backing. Also, if they bin him for Redknapp, then I will support that decision.

All I want is for Leicester City FC to win, be promoted and be successful. It`s great that we can all give an opinion on here, but let`s cut out the blue on blue fighting, and if someone has an alternative opinion to you lets not label them!

All that really matters today is :

middlesbrough 1 - 2 LCFC

:-)

[Craig]

If Danns didn't have a 'unique' song, or twitter account, no-one would give a shit.

As for Beckford, I like him, but he's never really looked like he's going to make it here.

Add to that that both of them are likely to be on a large wedge, I think we're better without them.

[seenitall]

Its a topic that seriously divides our support. The Pearson supporters are vociferous in shouting down anyone who dare mention anything against him, labelling them `Haters`. I hope I remain pragmatic about it, and just like 3 defeats should not be judged, neither should 3 wins in a row.

This season we have shown real promise, even in the away defeats our footbal has been good. I am quite surprised that Pearson has gone for a more attacking style rather than what he did at Hull City.

My concerns over his ability to manage us, is purely based on the following.

* Never been promoted from the Championship

* Very slow progress at LCFC, its taken a year to get to where we are now.

* Did nothing at Hull City

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way.

* Appalling attitude when interviewed

* rumours of unhapiness in the camp

* Falling attendances due to no improvement in the team.

For keeping him:

* Consistency

* the team is showing signs of improvement

* Change is rarely good in football

However, Football is not just a results business. Unless anyone on here is truly in the know, then none of us know about how he is to work for, and other stuff that goes on. I say this because I used to work for a VERY successful company, turning over millions of pounds profit, however the boss was a fruitcake, and pure evil. The staff turnover was massive, he was arrogant enough to think that good people will always be available, he didnt care about them, the morale was appalling. Yet from the outside the company was a shining light, he looked like a star. Just saying, we dont know it all.

Also remembering the furour when Mike Ashley made a great Business decision and binned the popular Hughton. What a great decision! He knew his people. Look at Blackburn, Steve Kean was hated by all, and eventually resigned when his team were at the top of the league with a new 8 million hitman just signed!

We need to trust the Thai`s, if they think that sticking with Pearson is right, and he continues to deliver, and he is managing morale correctly, then he gets my backing. Also, if they bin him for Redknapp, then I will support that decision.

All I want is for Leicester City FC to win, be promoted and be successful. It`s great that we can all give an opinion on here, but let`s cut out the blue on blue fighting, and if someone has an alternative opinion to you lets not label them!

All that really matters today is :

middlesbrough 1 - 2 LCFC

:-)

You should post more often sir - mind, you could be labelled a HATER for your Nige concerns..........

[Dan]

Over reactionary? who would buy the club not with the level of debt we have atm, we are stuck with the Thais and the decisions they make unless we are in the shitter i.e administration than they will remain here.

Not in the slightest, if they keep going at this rate then they'd have no choice but to fvck off when we're absolutely in the shit.

They're not loaded, they're loaning us money to pay them back eventually with interest, they're getting rid of a manager early every single fvcking season, they're failing to learn from previous mistakes.

I've defended them a lot of times but if they do this I'd literally be backing any campaign and making my voice heard that I want them absolutely nowhere near the club at all.

I'm not proud in the slightest to have their fvcking name plastered all over our ground making us look corporate and embarrassing, people would generally be more accepting if we're getting some kind of reward but in truth, we're actually getting fvcking little.

My biggest worry is that some people would consider the fact we had Redknapp (even though he replaced a manager who's clicking again with us) a reward alone and that would put us on par with Cardiff's red shirt wearers.

[Jace]

Who actually voted for Redknapp on that poll!?

[Guest shearfox]

Its a topic that seriously divides our support. The Pearson supporters are vociferous in shouting down anyone who dare mention anything against him, labelling them `Haters`. I hope I remain pragmatic about it, and just like 3 defeats should not be judged, neither should 3 wins in a row.

This season we have shown real promise, even in the away defeats our footbal has been good. I am quite surprised that Pearson has gone for a more attacking style rather than what he did at Hull City.

My concerns over his ability to manage us, is purely based on the following.

* Never been promoted from the Championship

* Very slow progress at LCFC, its taken a year to get to where we are now.

* Did nothing at Hull City

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way.

* Appalling attitude when interviewed

* rumours of unhapiness in the camp

* Falling attendances due to no improvement in the team.

For keeping him:

* Consistency

* the team is showing signs of improvement

* Change is rarely good in football

However, Football is not just a results business. Unless anyone on here is truly in the know, then none of us know about how he is to work for, and other stuff that goes on. I say this because I used to work for a VERY successful company, turning over millions of pounds profit, however the boss was a fruitcake, and pure evil. The staff turnover was massive, he was arrogant enough to think that good people will always be available, he didnt care about them, the morale was appalling. Yet from the outside the company was a shining light, he looked like a star. Just saying, we dont know it all.

Also remembering the furour when Mike Ashley made a great Business decision and binned the popular Hughton. What a great decision! He knew his people. Look at Blackburn, Steve Kean was hated by all, and eventually resigned when his team were at the top of the league with a new 8 million hitman just signed!

We need to trust the Thai`s, if they think that sticking with Pearson is right, and he continues to deliver, and he is managing morale correctly, then he gets my backing. Also, if they bin him for Redknapp, then I will support that decision.

All I want is for Leicester City FC to win, be promoted and be successful. It`s great that we can all give an opinion on here, but let`s cut out the blue on blue fighting, and if someone has an alternative opinion to you lets not label them!

All that really matters today is :

middlesbrough 1 - 2 LCFC

:-)

You're wrong, unhappiness in camp wtf you on about , Pearson has dealt with that by getting rid of the ones who don't want to play for the club and replace them with ones who do...

Slow progress really? I'm sure he was only here just over half of season , it's not taken 3 or 4 seasons to build a side that looks like it could challenge for promotion... Honestly you're opinions against are very harsh

[seenitall]

Told ya

[Mark_w]

* Never been promoted from the Championship

* Did nothing at Hull City

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way.

* Appalling attitude when interviewed

* rumours of unhapiness in the camp

* Falling attendances due to no improvement in the team.

*The expectation has never been for him to gain promotion to the Premiership when he's had a full season in charge of a Championship club until this one.

*Had Hull looking good for a Play-Off position despite the expectations being much lower. There's a reason they're still bitter.

*No proof of any of those falling outs at Leicester, St. Ledger was even allowed back in the team so I doubt that.

*His attitude when interviewed doesn't matter in the slightest.

*Based on the last three games, rumours of unhapiness in the camp appear to be bullshit. They are just rumours so not a particularly reasonable arguement.

*Falling attendances due to insane prices. (You'll have noticed the good football and 100% home record?)

[Dan]

* Never been promoted from the Championship

* Very slow progress at LCFC, its taken a year to get to where we are now.

* Did nothing at Hull City

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way.

* Appalling attitude when interviewed

* rumours of unhapiness in the camp

* Falling attendances due to no improvement in the team.

- Neither had people like Paul Lambert, Brendan Rodgers, Nigel Adkins & Brian McDermott - 4 of the last 6 to get a team promoted out of this league.

- I agree that progress hasn't been rapid but give me this over a short-term fix like Sven who seemed to make rapid progress and then undo it all completely.

- Harsh about Hull - they really shouldn't have been expecting it with the farce their club was in when he took them over. He made a lot of progress at Hull.

- Can't stand this "Pearson can't handle big name players" - course he can. What about Nugent, Konchesky, Schmeichel, Solano etc... do people not consider that selling them might actually be his own way of handling them?

- His attitude in interviews I'll give you that but I'd rather he was like that than revealed far too much and played up to the media. Mind you, it says a lot about him that this of all things is being used against him. How ridiculously trivial.

- "Rumours". Made up by people who milk the points you've given to a ridiculous level when they know absolutely nothing.

- The attendances point is the stupidest point of them. That is 99% down to Leicester's obscenely disgusting prices and not down to Pearson, Sven or even Sousa.

[Craig]

No improvement to the team .

1 point off of 1st.

[paulsherwood1]

No improvement to the team .

1 point off of 1st.

Three points off 11th :-)

[Raw Dykes]

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way.

I can't really understand this argument. How do you know he fell out with any of these players without good reason? How do you know he fell out with Gradel, Beckford, Danns or St. Ledger at all? Etc.? Go on then, list the rest of them.

Are Konchesky, Nugent, Schmeichel and Solano lower profile players than the ones you listed then?

In what way was Gradel high profile when he left?

Isn't it possible for a player to get dropped from a team because of their poor performances or laziness in training? Why does there always have to be some other explanation?

[foxfanazer]

I can't really understand this argument. How do you know he fell out with any of these players without good reason? How do you know he fell out with Gradel, Beckford, Danns or St. Ledger at all? Etc.? Go on then, list the rest of them.

In what way was Gradel high profile when he left?

Isn't it possible for a player to get dropped from a team because of their poor performances or laziness in training? Why does there always have to be some other explanation?

I can't really understand this argument. How do you know he fell out with any of these players without good reason? How do you know he fell out with Gradel, Beckford, Danns or St. Ledger at all? Etc.? Go on then, list the rest of them.

In what way was Gradel high profile when he left?

Isn't it possible for a player to get dropped from a team because of their poor performances or laziness in training? Why does there always have to be some other explanation?

Wait...let me guess this straight. You're suggesting that managers drop players for poor performances and purely footballing reasons? And Pearson hasn't nutted all these players in dressing room bust ups? Unthinkable!

[Dan]

Danns and St Ledger are hardly high profile either, I can accept constructive criticism but a lot of that just sticks of anti-Pearson bandwagon material and some of the "fans" who use that kind of thing are embarrassing.

[Guest shearfox]

Three points off 11th :-)

We never even stepped foot into the playoff places under Sven, the improvement is obvious to anyone.

[21st Century Fox]

Some stupid things being said about our owners now in this thread. The appointment of sven dreamy and far fetched? In hindsight maybe, but at the time, stfu. Pearson not spending available money. Somehow I can't see that, and besides, if our owners want to buy players and if they are this dreamy, clueless force, they would just buy the players themselves. Pearson can't stop the owners from spending money.

I wonder if vichai was a Richard and top was a tony, would they still have to suffer people assuming they are idiots

Also if the owners really wanted some marquee manager, why did they bring Pearson back in the first place? They could have easily waited it out with sven until another big name became available. What they actually did was intentionally discard a big name manager in favour of someone who they thought would bring success on the pitch. If all they wanted was a big name for their big brand then going back to Pearson would have been the furthest thing from their minds.

This, this, this. There's always a vein of xenophobia that runs through the majority of threads that discuss the owners. The Sven appointment looked good on paper AND was potentially a good move commercially for King Power and the club had it come off. It didn't, the owners had the balls to admit they got it wrong and brought back the guy who had previously got us closest to promotion, which when you think about it was short term commercial poison for their brand and probably explains why City games aren't being screened in Thailand this season. Everything they've done points to the long term but then again they've got weird names.

[Thracian]

Its a topic that seriously divides our support. The Pearson supporters are vociferous in shouting down anyone who dare mention anything against him, labelling them `Haters`. I hope I remain pragmatic about it, and just like 3 defeats should not be judged, neither should 3 wins in a row.

This season we have shown real promise, even in the away defeats our footbal has been good. I am quite surprised that Pearson has gone for a more attacking style rather than what he did at Hull City.

My concerns over his ability to manage us, is purely based on the following.

* Never been promoted from the Championship

* Very slow progress at LCFC, its taken a year to get to where we are now.

* Did nothing at Hull City

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way.

* Appalling attitude when interviewed

* rumours of unhapiness in the camp

* Falling attendances due to no improvement in the team.

For keeping him:

* Consistency

* the team is showing signs of improvement

* Change is rarely good in football

However, Football is not just a results business. Unless anyone on here is truly in the know, then none of us know about how he is to work for, and other stuff that goes on. I say this because I used to work for a VERY successful company, turning over millions of pounds profit, however the boss was a fruitcake, and pure evil. The staff turnover was massive, he was arrogant enough to think that good people will always be available, he didnt care about them, the morale was appalling. Yet from the outside the company was a shining light, he looked like a star. Just saying, we dont know it all.

Also remembering the furour when Mike Ashley made a great Business decision and binned the popular Hughton. What a great decision! He knew his people. Look at Blackburn, Steve Kean was hated by all, and eventually resigned when his team were at the top of the league with a new 8 million hitman just signed!

We need to trust the Thai`s, if they think that sticking with Pearson is right, and he continues to deliver, and he is managing morale correctly, then he gets my backing. Also, if they bin him for Redknapp, then I will support that decision.

All I want is for Leicester City FC to win, be promoted and be successful. It`s great that we can all give an opinion on here, but let`s cut out the blue on blue fighting, and if someone has an alternative opinion to you lets not label them!

All that really matters today is :

middlesbrough 1 - 2 LCFC

:-)

That argument is so flawed I'll leave it to Babs to sort out ... and Pearson wasn't even my first choice to be here a second time!

[Stevie Synex]

Its a topic that seriously divides our support. The Pearson supporters are vociferous in shouting down anyone who dare mention anything against him, labelling them `Haters`. I hope I remain pragmatic about it, and just like 3 defeats should not be judged, neither should 3 wins in a row.

This season we have shown real promise, even in the away defeats our footbal has been good. I am quite surprised that Pearson has gone for a more attacking style rather than what he did at Hull City.

My concerns over his ability to manage us, is purely based on the following.

* Never been promoted from the Championship

* Very slow progress at LCFC, its taken a year to get to where we are now.

* Did nothing at Hull City

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way.

* Appalling attitude when interviewed

* rumours of unhapiness in the camp

* Falling attendances due to no improvement in the team.

For keeping him:

* Consistency

* the team is showing signs of improvement

* Change is rarely good in football

However, Football is not just a results business. Unless anyone on here is truly in the know, then none of us know about how he is to work for, and other stuff that goes on. I say this because I used to work for a VERY successful company, turning over millions of pounds profit, however the boss was a fruitcake, and pure evil. The staff turnover was massive, he was arrogant enough to think that good people will always be available, he didnt care about them, the morale was appalling. Yet from the outside the company was a shining light, he looked like a star. Just saying, we dont know it all.

Also remembering the furour when Mike Ashley made a great Business decision and binned the popular Hughton. What a great decision! He knew his people. Look at Blackburn, Steve Kean was hated by all, and eventually resigned when his team were at the top of the league with a new 8 million hitman just signed!

We need to trust the Thai`s, if they think that sticking with Pearson is right, and he continues to deliver, and he is managing morale correctly, then he gets my backing. Also, if they bin him for Redknapp, then I will support that decision.

All I want is for Leicester City FC to win, be promoted and be successful. It`s great that we can all give an opinion on here, but let`s cut out the blue on blue fighting, and if someone has an alternative opinion to you lets not label them!

All that really matters today is :

middlesbrough 1 - 2 LCFC

:-)

A good post in the main but I would challenge your concerns of NP's ability to manage us as follows:-

* Never been promoted from the Championship

NP has only had two genuine opportunities to obtain promotion from the Championship, one we all know about and his first season at Hull where he managed a difficult situation well IMO and just finished 2 points behind us.

* Very slow progress at LCFC, its taken a year to get to where we are now.

It has taken him a year to sort out the s**t that was left post Sousa/Sven era's

* Did nothing at Hull City

Really?

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way.

if you had met Jimmy Bullard you would not have put his name into your list, I do not see any issue with St Ledger and as for Beckford and Mills your point is what exactly?

* Appalling attitude when interviewed

Not a reason for concerning yourself over his ability to manage - describe Sir Alex's attitude to the BBC until recently, didn't make him a bad manager did it?

* rumours of unhapiness in the camp

Don't believe all you hear

* Falling attendances due to no improvement in the team.

Falling attendances due to the fact that the majority of the country is skint, most clubs are having to deal with falling attendances. Listen to Talk Sport and you will hear Manchester United and Arsenal advertising some of their matches where they know attendance levels will be down. Attendance levels are a global issue and not just LCFC's.

[MPH]

Its a topic that seriously divides our support. The Pearson supporters are vociferous in shouting down anyone who dare mention anything against him, labelling them `Haters`. I hope I remain pragmatic about it, and just like 3 defeats should not be judged, neither should 3 wins in a row.

This season we have shown real promise, even in the away defeats our footbal has been good. I am quite surprised that Pearson has gone for a more attacking style rather than what he did at Hull City.

My concerns over his ability to manage us, is purely based on the following.

* Never been promoted from the Championship

* Very slow progress at LCFC, its taken a year to get to where we are now.

* Did nothing at Hull City

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way.

* Appalling attitude when interviewed

* rumours of unhapiness in the camp

* Falling attendances due to no improvement in the team.

For keeping him:

* Consistency

* the team is showing signs of improvement

* Change is rarely good in football

However, Football is not just a results business. Unless anyone on here is truly in the know, then none of us know about how he is to work for, and other stuff that goes on. I say this because I used to work for a VERY successful company, turning over millions of pounds profit, however the boss was a fruitcake, and pure evil. The staff turnover was massive, he was arrogant enough to think that good people will always be available, he didnt care about them, the morale was appalling. Yet from the outside the company was a shining light, he looked like a star. Just saying, we dont know it all.

Also remembering the furour when Mike Ashley made a great Business decision and binned the popular Hughton. What a great decision! He knew his people. Look at Blackburn, Steve Kean was hated by all, and eventually resigned when his team were at the top of the league with a new 8 million hitman just signed!

We need to trust the Thai`s, if they think that sticking with Pearson is right, and he continues to deliver, and he is managing morale correctly, then he gets my backing. Also, if they bin him for Redknapp, then I will support that decision.

All I want is for Leicester City FC to win, be promoted and be successful. It`s great that we can all give an opinion on here, but let`s cut out the blue on blue fighting, and if someone has an alternative opinion to you lets not label them!

All that really matters today is :

middlesbrough 1 - 2 LCFC

:-)

I would dispute a couple of your complaints about Nigel.

Firstly the History of falling out with players. He never fell out with Gradel - he even said he didnt want to sell him. Gradel wanted first team footy, loved it at Leeds and decided to stay. There is no evidence at all he has ' fallen out' with Danns or Beckford. All he has simply done is dropped them and preferred other players. He has said its up to people to prove they are worthy of being in the team. That to me is the exact sort of thing a manager should be doing. Unless you think its better to play people just because they cost alot and earn alot? Is that really the way to manage?

Very slow progress at CIty? And you blame him for that? He inherited alot of players who were not performing, were on large wages and were signed by a manager who played a completly different style of football to him and has started to change the mentality of a team. For me.. the fact we are where we are shows real progress.

Appaling atitude during interviews? My goodness if i had the numpty Stringer interviewing me, i cant promise i'd be as well behaved as Pearson is. Youtube is full of Videos of managers torming off half way through an interview shouting F this, F that. to me THAT is an appailing interview.

I would also dispute what you said about Hull. That he achieved nothing. If by nothing you mean he didnt get promotion, you would be right, However ,he managed to save the club from going into administration as well as bringing in some young lads with potential/ talent. He reduced their wage bill and got them heading in the right direction again. To me, when you read what sort of a mess Hull were in, that was a real achievment.

In my opinion there are alot of people who are very frustrated that we didnt get promoted last season, the Thais appear to of lent us millions to get promoted which didnt happen, and are looking for someone to blame. They often choose to blame Nigel and THIS is the reason they are called haters. He gets the blame for everything that has gone on at the club in the last 4 years since his last stint and since he was forced out.

[whitwickfox]

I am sure most on here realise my dislike of NP. Mainly due to his arrogance and his boring long ball football. However, I will admit I am pretty surprised how he has changed his stance on attractive attacking football.the game against hull was probably some of the best football I have seen for many a year.if I were running the show at lcfc, I certainly wouldn't now get rid of him, until maybe the end of the season. I hate to say it, but I feel NP is learning fast, and realises that this is the only way to play football. Hats of to the bloke

[Jace]

You don't get rid of a manager when you are winning, unless his nickname is Mad dog

[Babylon]

Oh where to start where to start...

Its a topic that seriously divides our support. The Pearson supporters are vociferous in shouting down anyone who dare mention anything against him, labelling them `Haters`. I hope I remain pragmatic about it, and just like 3 defeats should not be judged, neither should 3 wins in a row.

You are so correct you should never over react to three losses or wins on the trot. Although you do seem to have posted something a little bit different than that before.

This season we have shown real promise, even in the away defeats our footbal has been good. I am quite surprised that Pearson has gone for a more attacking style rather than what he did at Hull City.

How gracious of you, perhaps you will also give credit for the other "measurable improvements" we currently seem to have.

My concerns over his ability to manage us, is purely based on the following.

* Never been promoted from the Championship. Neither have the majority of managers promoted from this league in the most recent history of it.

* Very slow progress at LCFC, its taken a year to get to where we are now. Perhaps you need to review your own expectations of how quickly things happen.

* Did nothing at Hull City. And that's why they are all still so bitter about him leaving. Perhaps you should look into what he had to do there first.

* History of falling out with any sort of high profile player - Bullard, Gradel, Beckford, Danns, Mills, St Ledger etc. Its his way or no way. High profile? most of those in the list aren't even high profile, all have denied fallings out, and we currently have FA Cup winners, European finalists and ex england players in our ranks (something none of those can claim) whom he has absolutely no problem with.

* Appalling attitude when interviewed

* rumours of unhapiness in the camp. What rumours? I've heard rumours everyone loves him and things are great sitting one point off top. Perhaps we can now use that rumours for his good points.

* Falling attendances due to no improvement in the team. Utter rubbish. You think this has nothing to do with pricing and the world we live in. Look around the country, attendances are falling everywhere.

I'll deal with the rest later.

[Guest shearfox]

Oh where to start where to start...

You are so correct you should never over react to three losses or wins on the trot. Although you do seem to have posted something a little bit different than that before.

How gracious of you, perhaps you will also give credit for the other "measurable improvements" we currently seem to have.

I'll deal with the rest later.

Agree with everything you say

[Mack]

Some stupid things being said about our owners now in this thread. The appointment of sven dreamy and far fetched? In hindsight maybe, but at the time, stfu. Pearson not spending available money. Somehow I can't see that, and besides, if our owners want to buy players and if they are this dreamy, clueless force, they would just buy the players themselves. Pearson can't stop the owners from spending money.

I wonder if vichai was a Richard and top was a tony, would they still have to suffer people assuming they are idiots

Massive Wooooooooooooooosh.

No one said the Thais were idiots, inexperienced in Football and running a Football club? Undoubtedly.

I was suggesting that the ownership of LCFC for them is a Kudos thing back home, and an opportunity for them to associate their brand with one of, if not the most famous and popular sporting brand in Asia, The Premier League.

Do you think many Thais know who Pearson is? Now ask yourself the same about Redknapp.

I'm not saying I agree with it, I'm saying I can see where this could be coming from.