Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
kingfox

Who is better?

Recommended Posts

Posted

Years ago the music industry was dominated by the Beatles and the Rolling Stones, my era was dominated by the likes of S Club 7, Steps and Hear Say, this era though is currently being dominated by two immense acts. They have taken over the music industry, they have taken over the World, and rightfully so because they are that talented.

So who do you prefer... Justin Bieber or One Direction?

Would you rather be a Belieber or a Directioner?

Discuss

Posted

Can we just delete this topic mods??

It's an honest question mate.

They are in the news every day, and you really can't get enough of them.

Listen to Bieber's acoustic album, he will turn your mind.

Posted

At least the OP had the decency no to put this thread in the music section.

If I put it in the general section, it will get more views.

Posted

It's an honest question mate.

They are in the news every day, and you really can't get enough of them.

Listen to Bieber's acoustic album, he will turn your mind.

No, it's a shit attempt at humour by someone that thinks they're funnier than they are
Posted

Kingfox, I think you are slowly destroying yourself with all these threads...

My music taste is way off of those two 'artists', so I couldn't care less. And don't make me select one.

You're probably taking the p**s because they are not 'that talented' in any form. They shouldn't be mentioned anywhere near The Beatles or The Rolling Stones.

Posted

No, it's a shit attempt at humour by someone that thinks they're funnier than they are

Well tbh mate, it's not a shit attempt of anything. It is a serious question, they are in the news every day for something, and you can't help but see them being mentioned, so I was wondering what people thought of them, who do they prefer, or which one is less annoying than the other.

Kingfox, I think you are slowly destroying yourself with all these threads...

My music taste is way off of those two 'artists', so I couldn't care less. And don't make me select one.

You're probably taking the p**s because they are not 'that talented' in any form. They shouldn't be mentioned anywhere near The Beatles or The Rolling Stones.

Destroying myself, nah.

I have actually listened to both their albums on youtube, and people berate them too easily, when they actually have some decent songs.

I just said the Beatles and Rolling Stones because they were massive back in the day, now the likes of Bieber and 1D have taken over.

I'm not being funny, it's a true fact.

Posted

I'm not funny, it's a true fact.

Sorry couldn't resist,

As for those, I regularly and easily pass the day without hearing anything by or anything about either of them, so I have no opinion on who is the best, they both make pop music, and it could well be very good pop music, maybe even the best, but it is pop, and by that very definition it is formulaic and predictable written by marketers to sell the most records, it has no soul, and therefore the ability of some pretty boys to sing someone else's song is not much of a debate. You have a preference I assume, so feel free to share but don't expect a great debate on their artistic merits.

Posted

Well tbh mate, it's not a shit attempt of anything. It is a serious question, they are in the news every day for something, and you can't help but see them being mentioned, so I was wondering what people thought of them, who do they prefer, or which one is less annoying than the other.

Destroying myself, nah.

I have actually listened to both their albums on youtube, and people berate them too easily, when they actually have some decent songs.

I just said the Beatles and Rolling Stones because they were massive back in the day, now the likes of Bieber and 1D have taken over.

I'm not being funny, it's a true fact.

Im sure you had a little chuckle to yourself when you mentioned the Stones etc, then dropped the bomb of Bieber and 1D. They are in the media every day, not because of their breathtaking poetic talent, but because they are quite simply, marketable....to screaming little girls and also apparently self proclaimed banter kings.
Posted

Im sure you had a little chuckle to yourself when you mentioned the Stones etc, then dropped the bomb of Bieber and 1D. They are in the media every day, not because of their breathtaking poetic talent, but because they are quite simply, marketable....to screaming little girls and also apparently self proclaimed banter kings.

One more thing though mate, I don't think people realise how many lads sing their songs on youtube, people just suspect lads who listen or sing Bieber and 1D songs, are weird and gay, but that's not the case.

I'm sure if you go on youtube and type in Bieber and 1D covers, you will get loads of covers done by guys.

Wouldn't even have to listen to them.

Posted

Asking me this would be like asking me would I rather drink my own piss or eat my own shit. The answer to that would be neither. So there's your answer.

Posted

One more thing though mate, I don't think people realise how many lads sing their songs on youtube, people just suspect lads who listen or sing Bieber and 1D songs, are weird and gay, but that's not the case.

I'm sure if you go on youtube and type in Bieber and 1D covers, you will get loads of covers done by guys.

Wouldn't even have to listen to them.

Anyone posting videos of themselves singing on YouTube is a massive twat so not really representative of anything other than what twats think.

Posted

So then, let's actually get a proper question in this - Dio or Ozzy era Black Sabbath?

Dio was a better singer than ozzy, much better, and the 2 Dio albums are very good, but not a patch on masters of reality.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...