Ric Flair Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 I'm off my fuuckin barry but I thought if just drop in to say Jeffrey Schlupp was sensational today and nuff said. We're Up All Night For French Tony
I am Rod Hull Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 I'm off my fuuckin barry but I thought if just drop in to say Jeffrey Schlupp was sensational today and nuff said. We're Up All Night For French Tony http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uDhwFU9unc
connorlcfc Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 he did play well going forward and sometimes defensivley but , he showed on tuesday and in past games he comes up against someone experienced theres no point in him playing , his fall down is showing players inside and allowing them to get the shot away , i know he did play well yesterday but he did struggle with anyas pace
Dickov22 Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Great going forward, consistently exposed defensively down the left side. Must be difficult for him though, never really gets a run of games in one position so fair play to him.
Swarles Barkley Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Sets up a goal and runs back Turns defence into attacks Schluppy loopy nuts are we Were all schluppy loopy!
Guest MattP Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Great going forward but he's dreadful in defence. They cut him apart 4-5 times and it was only woeful finishing and a great save that stopped them scoring.
Strokes Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Great going forward but he's dreadful in defence. They cut him apart 4-5 times and it was only woeful finishing and a great save that stopped them scoring.He gave his man way to much space, far to many times. I do think the stuff he is missing can be coached though, and a great weapon going forwards.
smudger63 Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Thought he was excellent first half, but started to look a bit leg weary as the game wore on, which is no surprise given the amount of running up and down he had been doing. Especially given that he hasn`t had a great deal of pitch time, to really get his match fitness up as high as it might be. So he gets a big up from me. Well done Schluppy!
sdb Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Love Schlupp, think he'll make a very good left back - he's well on the way but naturally there'll be the odd mistake
foxfanazer Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Was worried about him before the Watford game and thought they would target him as a weak link, which they did but he handled it well the majority of the time. Also got forward well and linked up well with Lloyd. The only way is Schlupp!
Guest Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 he was bad defensively though Don't agree. first half his defence was very good. Second half a few mistakes.
Winnershfox Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Superb game and will only get better. Gave them hell all afternoon.
Kitchandro Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Yesterday is another example of why he's a winger, not a left back.
foxfanazer Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Has he got a chantThe only way is schlupp baby
dedlock Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 He played well first half.The tactics seemed to baffle Watford, he played an important part. His run / dribble for AK's goal created the goal. Watford's change at half time put both full backs on the back foot.Anya had more freedom which emphasised Jeff's inexperience in the position.
sdb Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 People need to see his potential and not expect him to be the finished article. He's very young and playing in a new position. He quite clearly can become a top LB imo. Him and Dyer are a wonderful combination too.
Kitchandro Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 People need to see his potential and not expect him to be the finished article. He's very young and playing in a new position. He quite clearly can become a top LB imo. Him and Dyer are a wonderful combination too. He's got no positional sense. It's not about him needing time, he's not a left back.
Guest shearfox Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 He's got no positional sense. It's not about him needing time, he's not a left back. I think he can do a job but against the better teams like Watford he was exposed several times... first half he looked great because he didn't have to defend but that 20 minute spell when Watford were coming forward he was caught out. It is true he certainly isn't a left back, if we want to get the best out of him then he should be played on the wing, he was awesome when he was going forward yesterday.
whitlock Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 Pretty sure all attacks and chances second half came from down his side. Potential to be a quality LB. Going forward isn't a problem.
sdb Posted 3 November 2013 Posted 3 November 2013 He's got no positional sense. It's not about him needing time, he's not a left back. Firstly, I completely disagree and secondly, positioning is absolutely something that can be taught and developed over time! Their best player is their right winger and he had a relatively quiet game - surely a good sign?!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.