itsblueupnorth Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 After hearing about Arsenals new shirt Sponser deal being worth £30m a season do you think that our owners would benefit from finding a new shirt Sponser for next season and also wouldn't it help generate cash for the FFP rules
Munshi Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 Forget the sponsor, lets get the kit actually looking half decent for once.
Ashley Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 King Power will remain as our sponsor no way would our Thai owners change it.
lavrentis Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 King Power will remain as our sponsor no way would our Thai owners change it. Do King Power actually do any business in the UK apart from obviously LCFC. I've never seen anything, seems kind of pointless to me
Unabomber Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 Wouldn't mind Topps Tiles again, that was a laugh.
Munshi Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 King Power will remain as our sponsor no way would our Thai owners change it. Yep, doesnt make a huge difference changing it tbf.
Guest MattP Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 The whole intention of their ownership is to give the King Power brand worldwide exposure so no chance would they sell it off with the audience that watches the PL.
Guest Sharpe's Fox Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 We are basically made to be a massive billboard for King Power in the Premier League, so probably not.
Jimothy Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 After hearing about Arsenals new shirt Sponser deal being worth £30m a season do you think that our owners would benefit from finding a new shirt Sponser for next season and also wouldn't it help generate cash for the FFP rules Their new "sponsorship" deal worth £150m over 5 years is actually Puma manufacturing the kit. Arsenal will still be sponsored by Fly Emirates, obviously they get shit loads for that, but their a huge team who play not only in the Premier League but the Champions league too. If we got their level we could be demanding that kind of money, but right now even teams like WBA are only picking up about £3m a year from Zoopla. What being sponsored by King Power does is allow us to be paid what we want, in the same way Man City are by Etihad, so we're actually in a better financial position having them as a sponsor.
Guest Mickyblueeyes Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 When does this season shirt cycle end?
sylofox Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 Their new "sponsorship" deal worth £150m over 5 years is actually Puma manufacturing the kit. Arsenal will still be sponsored by Fly Emirates, obviously they get shit loads for that, but their a huge team who play not only in the Premier League but the Champions league too. If we got their level we could be demanding that kind of money, but right now even teams like WBA are only picking up about £3m a year from Zoopla. What being sponsored by King Power does is allow us to be paid what we want, in the same way Man City are by Etihad, so we're actually in a better financial position having them as a sponsor. No it does not all sponsorship deals have to be set out as a legal binding contract. So if KP agreed 3mill a year for shirt and ground that is all they can pay. That is set up so no club like us could use it to print money to get round FFP. The reason our owners have converted 100mil into shares.
Jimothy Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 No it does not all sponsorship deals have to be set out as a legal binding contract. So if KP agreed 3mill a year for shirt and ground that is all they can pay. That is set up so no club like us could use it to print money to get round FFP. The reason our owners have converted 100mil into shares. What I mean is if King Power agreed in the next contract to pay is £100m a season, they can. If we went to an outside company, like Zoopla, we'd get the going rate for a club our size.
Matt Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 Do King Power actually do any business in the UK apart from obviously LCFC. I've never seen anything, seems kind of pointless to me The whole intention of their ownership is to give the King Power brand worldwide exposure so no chance would they sell it off with the audience that watches the PL. This. Infact if/when we do get in the PL I can even see them buying into UK and/or European airport duty free market. Maybe buy up the hotel opposite the stadium. I think you will see the King Power brand expand if/when we reach the PL. And fair play to them.
sylofox Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 What I mean is if King Power agreed in the next contract to pay is £100m a season, they can. If we went to an outside company, like Zoopla, we'd get the going rate for a club our size. You got no chance. Ok I'll ask this one last time as no one seems to answer it. How much do our owners pay to put there name on our shirts and the ground? That is one reason I do not trust our owners. No one comes up with a figure cos none show.
Jimothy Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 You got no chance. Ok I'll ask this one last time as no one seems to answer it. How much do our owners pay to put there name on our shirts and the ground? That is one reason I do not trust our owners. No one comes up with a figure cos none show. I was speaking hypothetically! Jesus! Talk about highlighting one part of a post to disprove something. IF they want to pay £100m they can. IF they want to pay £50m they can. IF they want to pay £10m they can. And seeing as a team like WBA get about £3m a year I'd guess our going rate would be around or just below that if we went up, so we'd still be better off with King Power, even if they agreed to £5m.
sylofox Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 I was speaking hypothetically! Jesus! Talk about highlighting one part of a post to disprove something. IF they want to pay £100m they can. IF they want to pay £50m they can. IF they want to pay £10m they can. And seeing as a team like WBA get about £3m a year I'd guess our going rate would be around or just below that if we went up, so we'd still be better off with King Power, even if they agreed to £5m. My point being nothing shows on the accounts so they pay fvck all.
Samilktray Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 I pray for the day we strike a deal with Nike. I may actually then be able to wear a Leicester shirt.
shade Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 I pray for the day we strike a deal with Nike. I may actually then be able to wear a Leicester shirt. what about Armani?
Samilktray Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 what about Armani? Only drug dealers wear Armani in this day & age.
Iwan is a Welshman Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 Am I going mad or are people complaining that we've not got a kit deal like Arsenal, when we do have a kit deal like Arsenal. In fact, it's the same damn manufacturer. This board amazes me at times.
Stadt Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 I pray for the day we strike a deal with Nike. I may actually then be able to wear a Leicester shirt.We'd just get a boring template with Nike.The same with Adidas and Puma.
Carl the Llama Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 Could a mod correct the title please? It hurts my brain.
gazfox9 Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 When does this season shirt cycle end? At the end of this season
StanSP Posted 27 January 2014 Posted 27 January 2014 Forget the sponsor, lets get the kit actually looking half decent for once. Nothing wrong with this season's. Last bad kit was the Topps Tiles one I think.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.