sylofox Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 Well this season just keeps getting better. 2-0 to us and thinking the Hornets are going to hate this trip. Shame it's not tomorrow do we have to wait a week FFS
lgfualol Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 As much as I want some other players to get 90mins, I think it'll be same again, and that's okay. Quite positive against this Watford team, they don't seem as strong but I guess they could prove us wrong. In any case, I'm thinking 2-0. Vardy and Dyer.
Cincinnati Fox Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 Will be goals Watford not bad going forward but can't defend And there back 3 is slow so we will rip them apart
Munshi Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 High scoring game. 4-2 Leicester Vardy Vardy Dyer De Laet Di Natale scores two for them.
Deucalion Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 Not complaining here, but we seem to have had several scrappy performances where we have won ugly. I'm talking about Leeds, Boro, Birmingham and now Bournemouth. It would be nice to have a really good performance where we show our class and top flight prospects. But...if the ball bounces in off Kevin Phillip's ass in the 87th minute, then that will do too.
sylofox Posted 1 February 2014 Author Posted 1 February 2014 Not complaining here, but we seem to have had several scrappy performances where we have won ugly. I'm talking about Leeds, Boro, Birmingham and now Bournemouth. It would be nice to have a really good performance where we show our class and top flight prospects. But...if the ball bounces in off Kevin Phillip's ass in the 87th minute, then that will do too. Thats not several you dummy it's 4 lol lol
MC Prussian Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 We could equalize Reading's winning record from the 2005/06 season with ten in succession.
Deucalion Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 Thats not several you dummy it's 4 lol lol Is there an general agreement as to how many 'several' are? A couple = 2 A few = 3 Several = more than three???
sylofox Posted 1 February 2014 Author Posted 1 February 2014 Is there an general agreement as to how many 'several' are? A couple = 2 A few = 3 Several = more than three??? You missed the thread then
Deucalion Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 The match thread? I was trying to it read while deciphering my wife's hints about what she wants to do about Valentine's Day. I saw something about several but missed the joke !! Sorry !!
Deucalion Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 Also... Loads = more than several ****loads = you wouldn't believe how many !!
sylofox Posted 1 February 2014 Author Posted 1 February 2014 The match thread? I was trying to it read while deciphering my wife's hints about what she wants to do about Valentine's Day. I saw something about several but missed the joke !! Sorry !! Someone the other week seemed to think several ment 7 thats why all the several comments.
maynefox Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 3v0 I really can't see us losing at home to these, or most of the opposition in the Championship, with the confidence/form we have!
Deucalion Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 Someone the other week seemed to think several ment 7 thats why all the several comments. Ok, must pay attention in future !!
StanSP Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 Stop writing next as 'Nxt'. It's one fvcking letter you're missing out Anyway, 4-1 win I think .
lcfc1994 Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 A perfect 10 would be amazing!! I'd love it. 1-0 win again i'm going for, then Forest would really want to beat us.
MC Prussian Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 Unleash the beast, exorcise the last remaining few Watford demons and display what we can do when firing on all cylinders. Reach for the top, reach for a new joint-top winning record in the Championship and aim even higher. That's the way to do it. (Without underestimating your opposition, of course)
sylofox Posted 1 February 2014 Author Posted 1 February 2014 A perfect 10 would be amazing!! Too right it would with Qpr away to the sheep Burnley home to millwall.
TrentFox Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 Will be goals Watford not bad going forward but can't defend And there back 3 is slow so we will rip them apart If the Forest game is anything to go by, then spot on. Their defending would have been poor for a Conference team in that game. But they can create something from nothing. A disciplined performance should see us over the line in this one.
Guest ttfn Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 Let's stuff these. Really rub their noses in it. Knockaert will be massively up for this and this looks like a home banker. So 0-2, Watford to score twice on the break in the first half. Forest at home all over again! Either that or 5-0.
Deucalion Posted 1 February 2014 Posted 1 February 2014 I seem to remember that getting wins seemed far harder in the second half of the League One season. I think it might be a bit like this now. A few teams get walloped, we are clear at the top, and teams do not want to play open football against us. Anyone think home games might get a bit more frustrating?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.