lestajigs Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 Even if they have got someone better in the pipeline to take the club forward (which I hope they have). The owners loose a lot of my respect by sacking him by phone call!! What ****ing worms
lestajigs Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 I thought there was a thread on here only a few days ago saying they were fantastic people and superb owners? That particular tide has changed very quickly. Yea just like (myself included) was happy when news of Pearsons sacking in February, now I'm outraged!! Things do changem, that's life
Frank to be Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 Even if they have got someone better in the pipeline to take the club forward (which I hope they have). The owners loose a lot of my respect by sacking him by phone call!! What ****ing worms Dude it's the mirror. They're just making it up. They've no more information than you or I.
hackneyfox Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 What do you mean 'little choice'? What would've happened if they didn't? I suspect little more than a bit of animosity which would likely have died down by the start of the season. Not really the sort of situation where the phrase 'no choice' really applies IMO. As I mentioned perhaps the recent fallout in relations due to his son's sacking was the final straw after last years media fcukups. The fact that it happened on the last day of football contracts now makes me think this isn't knee jerk.
Alex_LCFC Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 Can't take a daily mirror article and then dislike theowners decision. There's going to be behind the doors stuff that we won't ever know. There will be family tension with his sons antics. Maybe pearson thought the whole prossy situation wasn't a stackable Affence and was defending his son as parents do. All tho we all no what they did was wrong. That nonsense you put about the owners sacking Soussa, getting sven etc. Both of them were utter shit and needed sacking. Top would have made this decision with thorough thought and will have replacements in mind. Everything they have done has been within best interest of our club.
lestajigs Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 Dude it's the mirror. They're just making it up. They've no more information than you or I. Yea probally true,
Jace Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 I know its not the best time for jokes, but I can just imagine Pearsons face after that phone call.....
Frank to be Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 Remember when they sacked Sven, no end of people were gutted. That's been conveniently forgotten now, but it was a widely unpopular decision that proved spot on.
Jace Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 What about the last 2 times Pearson has gone though worked out better with him coming back
Soar Fox Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 Imagine if it was James who answered the phone Phone rings "Hello" Hello is Nigel there please "yeah who's calling" It's Vichai "Oh hi Vichai its James I'll just get him for you" Hello Vichai how are you this evening "I'm ok nige but you might not like it your sacked" Oh ok vich thanks for everything.... James get down here immediately "What's up dad I'm just skyping Hops" Because of you I've just lost my job "Oh sorry dad.... So does this mean when you get another club you'll take me with you???
lestajigs Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 Remember when they sacked Sven, no end of people were gutted. That's been conveniently forgotten now, but it was a widely unpopular decision that proved spot on. Mmmm a bit different of circumstances mate
cc_star Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 If Pearson is ASTONISHED as the article claims, I don't buy this relationship nonsense. That wouldn't come out the blue, bullshit! They've got somebody lined up There was Leicester before Pearson and they'll be Leicester after Pearson, but I don't have confidence in them one bit I think they know **** all, I think they've lost patience with Pearson pushing for continual, sustainable improvement and they want to go hell for leather in a rush for 5th spot I don't think they'll have a clue who to appoint, they had their feet under the table when Pearson was forced out before in favour of Sousa Sven too, appointed for his celebrity as much as anything And then when he never even troubled a playoff position despite out spending the whole Football League combined, the only names they knew of were MoN and thankfully Pearson. 2 former mangers who were probably still on speed dial in the chairman's office. I expect them to not look much beyond Lennon or a big-spending 'name' This could go either way now and I don't mean survival or relegation as that was no different for Pearson... The Pearson difference was sustainability and an ability to do more, with less. Fvck this situation the day before transfer window opens and preseason starts Imagine being Huth, Fuchs or Schlupp Wonder what Cambiasso will do now after he had a deal agreed according to a pretty reliable souce We're in tatters before a ball is kicked because Pearson breeds incredible loyalty among his players Still, Blue Army!!!
cc_star Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 Remember when they sacked Sven, no end of people were gutted. That's been conveniently forgotten now, but it was a widely unpopular decision that proved spot on. I think you're mis-remembering It was pretty popular and a few weeks coming, only those who fell for the conman's scam were gutted
Frank to be Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 Mmmm a bit different of circumstances mate The point still stands. They sacked him when a lot of people thought they shouldn't and it turned out OK. They reappointed Pearson when a lot of people thought they shouldn't and that turned out OK. They showed faith in Pearson when a lot of people thought they shouldn't and that turned out OK too. Now they sacked him when a lot of people think they shouldn't, maybe this will turn out OK as well.
dogadug Posted 30 June 2015 Posted 30 June 2015 Remember when they sacked Sven, no end of people were gutted. That's been conveniently forgotten now, but it was a widely unpopular decision that proved spot on. You're really comparing the 30% if that who wanted Sven to stay with the 95%+ who were looking forward to next season with Pearson in charge. OK
blueharmie Posted 1 July 2015 Posted 1 July 2015 Top is a prize Twat and so are the other idiots. You don't sack a manager that has got us to this position. They have not got a clue about football. What's next... Calling us the Leicester red foxes? I don't give a **** what happened in Thailand. Thailand has sluts...wow. This will be the same as when Taylor came in... Watch us fall.... Thankyou schrivacluelesscutnsuky family.
Soar Fox Posted 1 July 2015 Posted 1 July 2015 Top is a prize Twat and so are the other idiots. You don't sack a manager that has got us to this position. They have not got a clue about football. What's next... Calling us the Leicester red foxes? I don't give a **** what happened in Thailand. Thailand has sluts...wow. This will be the same as when Taylor came in... Watch us fall.... Thankyou schrivacluelesscutnsuky family. Good post buddy
Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 1 July 2015 Posted 1 July 2015 Good post buddy I thought it was you at first tbqh imho
Harry - LCFC Posted 1 July 2015 Posted 1 July 2015 The point still stands. They sacked him when a lot of people thought they shouldn't and it turned out OK. They reappointed Pearson when a lot of people thought they shouldn't and that turned out OK. They showed faith in Pearson when a lot of people thought they shouldn't and that turned out OK too. Now they sacked him when a lot of people think they shouldn't, maybe this will turn out OK as well. The common theme there is that success came when Pearson was in charge. Now that he's gone maybe it won't turn out OK.
Clever Fox Posted 1 July 2015 Posted 1 July 2015 Football has to be the weirdest business in the world. As an owner you hand over 10s of millions of your money to someone else to spend. And you no say in how they spend it.
Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot Posted 1 July 2015 Posted 1 July 2015 Football has to be the weirdest business in the world. As an owner you hand over 10s of millions of your money to someone else to spend. And you no say in how they spend it. Think this could be one of the major contributing factors. Did Pearson sign Okazaki, or did the owners?
STUHILL Posted 1 July 2015 Posted 1 July 2015 Think this could be one of the major contributing factors. Did Pearson sign Okazaki, or did the owners? Considering Walsh did an interview saying they have been watching him for 2 years and wanted to sign him last summer and then again in January and how happy he was to finally get him, be surprised if this wasn't a Pearson/Walsh signing. Either that or Walsh is a very good actor!
Guest Posted 1 July 2015 Posted 1 July 2015 The point still stands. They sacked him when a lot of people thought they shouldn't and it turned out OK. They reappointed Pearson when a lot of people thought they shouldn't and that turned out OK. They showed faith in Pearson when a lot of people thought they shouldn't and that turned out OK too. Now they sacked him when a lot of people think they shouldn't, maybe this will turn out OK as well. The positive thing is that each time we sacked him we eventually brought him back. And each time we brought him back we improved. Ergo, he'll come back next season, and the season after that we'll qualify for Champions League. Pretty tidy 5 year plan I reckon.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.