Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Jimothy

Southampton away Match thread

Recommended Posts

Posted

Because goals are about the team unless you have an outstanding talent - which we don't - Okazaki is doing great work for the team just he's your Wellens at the moment.

You slagged cambiasso off over and over, now defending the position of Okazaki within the XI?

Posted

Mahrez and Dyer on

 

Simpson and Kasper off

Posted

Why is Okazaki getting so much stick when he has been much more lively than Vardy and we're losing courtesy of shit defending and an offside goal that he played no part in?

It's his wastefulness in the first half, he's been sloppy and keeps looking for fouls all of the time, one game he's brilliant the next he's pants.

Posted

You slagged cambiasso off over and over, now defending the position of Okazaki within the XI?

 

Are you the guy slagging of CR when we're in the top half of the table?

Posted

Liveliness is no excuse for being wasteful and unfocused.

Okazaki's poor run without a goal seems to continue. No idea why Ranieri is still including him in his starting XI.

Don't think he was too wasteful or unfocused.

He's off though, along with Schlupp who really was poor, so let's hope Vardy steps up

Posted

Really have no clue what you're talking about...

Yes I do, I'll say it again... you said we can't play two work horses. Look at the table, that's the end of it.

 

 

Answer the question,

If vardy goes on a drought who is going to score the goals? It's not Okazaki is it...

If he goes on a goal drought we have other strikers to play in that position. We also have players that managed to score about 41 goals last year if you take off Vardy's. We've had players from all over the pitch score this year as well.

 

Your points are two totally different things. 1) can we afford to play two work horses and 2) can we afford to play two strikers who aren't scoring.

 

 

Nothing to do wig bugging myself up is it you fool, I haven't mentioned myself once. Was talking about our players, this looks to me like an attempt to blow your own trumpet to be honest.

Really?

 

"Just to add, God ripped to shreds when I said van dijk was top class 18 months ago, shame I wasn't wrong."

 

 

 

Let's stick with a 442 and the same players forever then.

 

Yeah, because I've said that haven't I.

 

 

Arguably on evidence so far, keeping nugent would have us in a similar position without all the falling over.

You mean Nugent the work horse.

 

 

If you want to rely on vardy hitting 25 this year then fine,

I think we should be looking to improve at all times, and I'm not sure Okazaki is the player to do that.

There are ten other players on the pitch and seven substitutes FFS. The reality is, Vardy has been scoring. It's no coincidence that he's scoring more and getting more chances when he isn't playing as the support striker. Having someone else do a lot of the dirty work has freed him up to be the focal point. If he stops scoring then you look at changing it.

 

But to say you can't do what we've actually been doing and doing successfully is just stupid.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...