Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Sionnach gorm

Leicester City ranked 12th...in the world!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Statistics show though that our rank (12) + our movement (+364) = 376, added onto our total of 1788pts = 2162 whereas Spurs total is 1821, thus we are better than Spurs.

Posted

Wrong. We should be 8th on that list at least. How can anyone justify Tottenham being above us? We have beaten them in their own yard and we are above them in the league, its ludicrous. And the fact that our club badge doesn't show is an insult.

Posted

Up 364 spaces that is incredible lol

Wrong. We should be 8th on that list at least. How can anyone justify Tottenham being above us? We have beaten them in their own yard and we are above them in the league, its ludicrous. And the fact that our club badge doesn't show is an insult.

European competition I guess, once we win the champions league we will be well above...

Posted

I propose a fan alliance with Chicken Inn FC

 

We might get free chicken and a trip to Zimbabwe.

All it will require is our bank account details and sort code.

4203889533a5613998047l.jpg

Posted

Villa are also behind Inverness caley thistle....I don't think i've stopped laughing for the last 10 minutes! !

Posted

*How were the world's best club rankings calculated?

Points were awarded for wins and draws, depending on the level of competition.

The IFFHS split nations into four levels based on the relative strength of their domestic league, with the strongest leagues at the top (example England/Level 4). A win in a level four league gives a club four points, a draw equates to two points and there are zero points for a loss, regardless of the level.

League competitions at the other three levels accrue the following points:

Level 3: W = three points, D = 1.5 points

Level 2: W = two points, D = 1 point

Level 1: W = 1 point, D = 0.5 point

In terms of domestic cups, from the quarter final onwards, 12 points are given for a win, six for a draw and zero for a loss. A match won by penalties is considered to be a draw.

Level 3: W = eight points, D = four points

Level 2: W = five points, D = 2.5 points

Level 1: W = 1.5 points, D = 0.75 point

Continental level competitions are awarded points on this basis…

Posted

*How were the world's best club rankings calculated?

Points were awarded for wins and draws, depending on the level of competition.

The IFFHS split nations into four levels based on the relative strength of their domestic league, with the strongest leagues at the top (example England/Level 4). A win in a level four league gives a club four points, a draw equates to two points and there are zero points for a loss, regardless of the level.

League competitions at the other three levels accrue the following points:

Level 3: W = three points, D = 1.5 points

Level 2: W = two points, D = 1 point

Level 1: W = 1 point, D = 0.5 point

In terms of domestic cups, from the quarter final onwards, 12 points are given for a win, six for a draw and zero for a loss. A match won by penalties is considered to be a draw.

Level 3: W = eight points, D = four points

Level 2: W = five points, D = 2.5 points

Level 1: W = 1.5 points, D = 0.75 point

Continental level competitions are awarded points on this basis…

Crikey!

Posted

Wrong. We should be 8th on that list at least. How can anyone justify Tottenham being above us? We have beaten them in their own yard and we are above them in the league, its ludicrous. And the fact that our club badge doesn't show is an insult.

 

Europa League results...

Posted

Europa League results...

 

I don't get how you can include those. Is a team that isn't in the Europa League or one that finished bottom of their champions league group automatically worse that a team who beats small European clubs but is below them in a league table?

Posted

I don't get how you can include those. Is a team that isn't in the Europa League or one that finished bottom of their champions league group automatically worse that a team who beats small European clubs but is below them in a league table?

 

Football is not exactly transitive. Just because we beat Spurs at their place doesn't mean we can beat anyone. We do not deserve to be considered a top 5 team in Europe because we're atop of one of the top 5 leagues in Europe. Spurs took 4 points from Arsenal while we got doubled. Spurs beat Fiorentina, Anderlecht and Monaco while we didn't play them. Those are great sides, not exactly small European clubs and any one of them would be in hunt for a top 7 spot in the Prem. We're the best team in this league as we've gotten it done in the 31 games that count towards it. However that shouldn't necessarily make us the best overall side in England when there are 3 more fronts to fight for trophies and the supplemental games that come with them.

 

I have no problem with Spurs being ahead of us on that ranking. It doesn't mean much to me. All I care is that our boys get it done in the 7 games that matter to us. I'm just putting out there that it's not ludicrous that an algorithmic ranking tool put them above us. And I have no problem with rankings not tailoring to the last 31 or 40 league games that make us the best in one competition in England and like that means we would have put up a better fight to save the English coefficient.

Posted

I propose a fan alliance with Chicken Inn FC

 

We might get free chicken and a trip to Zimbabwe.

All it will require is our bank account details and sort code.

4203889533a5613998047l.jpg

 

Hahaha ... hilarious lol lol lol

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...