Viva Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 There was NO 30m bid lol Feck sake we live in a world if a premier league player takes a shite in Hong Kong , New York fans run a story that the said shite was seen passing Hawaii looking for a testimonial before moving to AC MILAN !!! Holy god really ... How old are you? Showing your age a fair bit here.
GaelicFox Posted 4 June 2016 Author Posted 4 June 2016 Yes and probably with a lot of toys thrown out of the pram! Shut up now your talking shit This guy has stuck around at every club and moved when the time is right for him and the club At Fleetwood he was denied a move at Christmas , he nuckled down and got on with it Seriously your taking shite chum ! No one in our dressing room throws toys .... Huth would just sit on them till the pram broke How old are you? Showing your age a fair bit here. A lot older than you numbskull
Viva Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Shut up now your talking shit This guy has stuck around at every club and moved when the time is right for him and the club At Fleetwood he was denied a move at Christmas , he nuckled down and got on with it Seriously your taking shite chum ! No one in our dressing room throws toys .... Huth would just sit on them till the pram broke A lot older than you numbskull I'm not getting into an argument with a naive child.
GaelicFox Posted 4 June 2016 Author Posted 4 June 2016 Fleetwood town get 25% of his fee !!!!! What a time to be alive I'm not getting into an argument with a naive child. Right oh .... No need to argue chief , your done
Matt Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Fleetwood town get 25% of his fee !!!!! What a time to be alive Right oh .... No need to argue chief , your done I see he won't respond to my comments, I think we're both on the same wave length. His opinion of Vardy throwing his toys out the pram if he didn't get a new contract wouldn't have gone down well with other clubs - They'd go off him, wouldn't be interested and he wouldn't have got him move anyway if he did throw his toys out the pram, would never have happened!
Viva Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 I see he won't respond to my comments, I think we're both on the same wave length. His opinion of Vardy throwing his toys out the pram if he didn't get a new contract wouldn't have gone down well with other clubs - They'd go off him, wouldn't be interested and he wouldn't have got him move anyway if he did throw his toys out the pram, would never have happened! Do you and Gaelic just think the club thought, I know what, let's double Vardy's wages and while we are at it, shall we put in a really low release clause just for good measure? Then we'll let him leave in the summer for cheap without a good reason?
Matt Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Do you and Gaelic just think the club thought, I know what, let's double Vardy's wages and while we are at it, shall we put in a really low release clause just for good measure? Then we'll let him leave in the summer for cheap without a good reason? No I think the club have been held to ransom by Vardy/his agent when there was no need. If he wanted to leave in the summer, we'd probably have let him - At the right price. £20m is not the right price though, for some reason our negotiating teams obviously just bowed down and let them get their demands very easily. Personally it'd have been a take or leave it offer, or we'll discuss it and come to an agreement, the club were in a position that they were calling the shots (Or should have been) but it seems that the club forgot that and roles were reversed.
Viva Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 No I think the club have been held to ransom by Vardy/his agent when there was no need. If he wanted to leave in the summer, we'd probably have let him - At the right price. £20m is not the right price though, for some reason our negotiating teams obviously just bowed down and let them get their demands very easily. Personally it'd have been a take or leave it offer, or we'll discuss it and come to an agreement, the club were in a position that they were calling the shots (Or should have been) but it seems that the club forgot that and roles were reversed. Do you think many clubs would have paid £30-£40m for a 29 year old?
Matt Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Do you think many clubs would have paid £30-£40m for a 29 year old? Yes.
Viva Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Yes. I don't think so, or at least there was a chance they wouldn't, hence the reason Vardy signed the deal with the lower release clause. Man Utd, Chelsea and Liverpool obviously wouldn't as they have not done so. So that only leaves Spurs, Man City and Arsenal. Can't see Vardy signing for Pep and Spurs have already got Kane. So you only have Arsenal left.
Matt Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 I don't think so, or at least there was a chance they wouldn't, hence the reason Vardy signed the deal with the lower release clause. Man Utd, Chelsea and Liverpool obviously wouldn't as they have not done so. So that only leaves Spurs, Man City and Arsenal. Can't see Vardy signing for Pep and Spurs have already got Kane. So you only have Arsenal left. It seems West Ham and Liverpool are/were interested, according to reports, could be BS.
Viva Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 It seems West Ham and Liverpool are/were interested, according to reports, could be BS. He wouldn't go to West Ham, and i'd be surprised if he would leave us for a non Champions League team. If Liverpool have bid over £30m which i'd be very surprised at, then he must have turned them down, because i'm sure we would have been pushing that move.
Gerard Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 You are still not living in the real world. Do you seriously think Vardy would not have been negatively affected if we had said, stay on your 40k and don't move to a Champions League club tripling his wages at his age? Also would Vardy have played as well in the second half of the season if we did? If the answer is no, then why piss him off to potentially lose the league? Contracts are two way negotiations, just because Vardy wants £80k a week and a £20m release fee doesn't mean he gets it or throws his toys out the pram. We could have demanded a £30m release fee and said it was non negotiable. What are Vardy's options: 1) to not sign it and stay on his 2.5 year, 40k a week contract? If he did this and downed tools then he would suffer more. Who will want a player that is 29 and a proven mardy arse that has only performed at that level for less a year. He has more to lose than Leicester. The likely scenario is he would have signed a 80k a week contract with a £30m release clause and got on with it. Boo hoo that he didn't get everything he asked for but his starting position was weak and that's life.
Manwell Pablo Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Just wrote this in the Vardy thread. It's absolutely idiotic whoever did the contract negotiations. What were club actually benefitting from when offering Vardy a new contract in February? Because it's seems to me nothing really, not for the sake of tieing him down for 1 extra year. If it was a case of Vardy and his agent demanding a release clause or they wouldn't sign the contract, so be it, for the sake of an extra year, they should have withdrawn the contract that was offered in February. The club have actually lost out by giving him a new contract in February, I don't know there wasn't a release clause in his previous contract but i'm fairly confident there wouldn't have been. ....why are you so confident there wasn't one. Could well of been one, could well have been about 10.
Matt Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 ....why are you so confident there wasn't one. Could well of been one, could well have been about 10. In which case if he wanted to move in the summer why sign a new contract with a higher release clause? Take 3 or 4 months on the lower wage (Hardly "low" or on the poverty line is it) and run away in the summer, for a big sign on fee and massive wage rise.
Viva Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Contracts are two way negotiations, just because Vardy wants £80k a week and a £20m release fee doesn't mean he gets it or throws his toys out the pram. We could have demanded a £30m release fee and said it was non negotiable. What are Vardy's options: 1) to not sign it and stay on his 2.5 year, 40k a week contract? If he did this and downed tools then he would suffer more. Who will want a player that is 29 and a proven mardy arse that has only performed at that level for less a year. He has more to lose than Leicester. The likely scenario is he would have signed a 80k a week contract with a £30m release clause and got on with it. Boo hoo that he didn't get everything he asked for but his starting position was weak and that's life. Vardy obviously wants to move to a 'big club'. I imagine he wanted the same in January too. It would have been too much of a risk in our most important season ever, to risk him even slightly losing his focus or disrupting anything in the dressing room for the run-in. Hence offering him the chance to leave in the summer and giving him the wages he was worth. I don't think Arsenal would have paid £30m for him anyway, but that's a different matter.
Tuna Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 If the clause is 30 mill as is now reported its good business, van Persie went for similar at the same age to Man United. Where is he now? Toilet paper.
peach0000 Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Could it be that vardy had a release clause in his old contract and this new contract has raised it.
FireFox Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Could it be that vardy had a release clause in his old contract and this new contract has raised it. Doubt it because as Claudio said in January, "no club has enough money to buy our players".
Carl the Llama Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Doubt it because as Claudio said in January, "no club has enough money to buy our players". "...Except for Arsenal, but do not fear they never try to sign new players anyway"
Merging Cultures Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 part and parcel of football. Besides, if arsenal want to pay over 20 million pounds for him more power to them, doesn't suit their setup, he's 30 in January, he's had one outstanding season at top level I'd be listening regardless of a release clause, I can't ever see him bettering what he's done this year....sad to see him go but onwards and upwards for us. We've stated numerous times we only want players that want to be here, it's served us well this year, it's a policy we should be maintaining. Yes!
Webbo Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 Doubt it because as Claudio said in January, "no club has enough money to buy our players". He also said dilly ding, dilly dong. What does that prove? Why do people take comments so literally?
GaelicFox Posted 4 June 2016 Author Posted 4 June 2016 He also said dilly ding, dilly dong. What does that prove? Why do people take comments so literally? Well no one did So maybe he was talking literally ?
Viva Posted 4 June 2016 Posted 4 June 2016 It's amazing how many people on here think they can run a clearly very well run football club better than our current owners. Also it surprises me how much inside knowledge everybody has. I guess a lot of people know the players and agents personally. Fair enough.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.