Alf Bentley Posted 19 April 2018 Share Posted 19 April 2018 Just now, Innovindil said: Because selling people's personal data would have gone down a treat. Some of the more recent docs might need to have a time embargo, but Ancestry already have passenger listings online from 1940s/1950s - valuable even if some records had to be embargoed for a few years. I found one of my great-uncles going to and fro from Hong Kong in the 40s & 50s, plus my uncle emigrating to Australia as a young man. The 1940 US census is already online and 1950 will be published in 2022. The UK keeps censuses private for 100 years, but a pre-war register (1938?) has been out for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MattP Posted 19 April 2018 Share Posted 19 April 2018 Priti Patel is really hot. On This Week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 The fight back starts here Tory MPs among backers of motion demanding vote on EU customs union https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/apr/19/backbench-mps-motion-force-vote-eu-customs-union?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlloverthefloorYesNdidi Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 https://www.mintpressnews.com/theresa-mays-change-of-heart-on-syria-strikes-nothing-to-explain-it-except-a-family-chat/240747/ No secret intelligence which we are not privy to. Sorry if this has been posted already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buce Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 3 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said: https://www.mintpressnews.com/theresa-mays-change-of-heart-on-syria-strikes-nothing-to-explain-it-except-a-family-chat/240747/ No secret intelligence which we are not privy to. Sorry if this has been posted already Wow, talk about conflict of interests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 6 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said: https://www.mintpressnews.com/theresa-mays-change-of-heart-on-syria-strikes-nothing-to-explain-it-except-a-family-chat/240747/ No secret intelligence which we are not privy to. Sorry if this has been posted already Embarrassing that so many people (looks around the thread) are willing to support military action based on some grainy video of unknown provenance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlloverthefloorYesNdidi Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 5 minutes ago, Buce said: Wow, talk about conflict of interests. 2 minutes ago, toddybad said: Embarrassing that so many people (looks around the thread) are willing to support military action based on some grainy video of unknown provenance. Says a lot that we gave so much time to Corbyn attending a Seder and this news is only fit for fringe media outlets apparently 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buce Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 22 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said: Says a lot that we gave so much time to Corbyn attending a Seder and this news is only fit for fringe media outlets apparently The mainstream media owners favour the Establishment and the status quo. It's all part of the conspiracy to keep Corbyn away from power because they are all terrified of the change it might bring. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 35 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said: https://www.mintpressnews.com/theresa-mays-change-of-heart-on-syria-strikes-nothing-to-explain-it-except-a-family-chat/240747/ No secret intelligence which we are not privy to. Sorry if this has been posted already Is there any evidence to back up anything in that article? I can't see a single quote. If you look around that site a bit it's blatantly a hard left website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 13 minutes ago, Webbo said: Is there any evidence to back up anything in that article? I can't see a single quote. If you look around that site a bit it's blatantly a hard left website. Do you have some evidence to the contrary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 2 minutes ago, toddybad said: Do you have some evidence to the contrary? I'm not the one making stuff up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlloverthefloorYesNdidi Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 18 minutes ago, Webbo said: Is there any evidence to back up anything in that article? I can't see a single quote. If you look around that site a bit it's blatantly a hard left website. It does look far left I concede Dont know about the intelligence stuff But May's husband being linked to the invest firm which profits from these bombings would be pretty checkable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 4 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said: It does look far left I concede Dont know about the intelligence stuff But May's husband being linked to the invest firm which profits from these bombings would be pretty checkable What about the May told Trump she wouldn't get involved and then changed her mind when she spoke to her husband? What evidence is there for that? the raid would have happened anyway, so what benefit did Philip May gain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlloverthefloorYesNdidi Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 6 minutes ago, Webbo said: What about the May told Trump she wouldn't get involved and then changed her mind when she spoke to her husband? What evidence is there for that? the raid would have happened anyway, so what benefit did Philip May gain? This article is wilting under the lights a bit But do you not recogise a conflict of interest there then? More bombs means more profits for the investment company. Of course he gains Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innovindil Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 Didn't something like this come up before? Swear I remember something about amazon and how the capital group Mr May works for has shares in it. It went on to say Mr May doesn't have sod all to do with any investments, or any research into investments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopfkino Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 ffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogstanley Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Buce said: The mainstream media owners favour the Establishment and the status quo. It's all part of the conspiracy to keep Corbyn away from power because they are all terrified of the change it might bring. Yeah, not sure I totally buy into the "establishment is scared or Corbyn" line but when you look at the last month, with Corbyn coming under a sustained attack for an ambiguous comment made years ago, and May basically getting away with denying people cancer treatment & deporting people based on ethnic origin and then having the utter filth mindset to use it as an opportunity to bash Corbyn, and as if that isn't enough then blindly following Trump into bombing a foreign country with no real evidence and yet barely getting any criticism from the press, it's hard to avoid the conclusion that the two aren't exactly being treated equally. Edited 20 April 2018 by Rogstanley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strokes Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 1 hour ago, Buce said: The mainstream media owners favour the Establishment and the status quo. It's all part of the conspiracy to keep Corbyn away from power because they are all terrified of the change it might bring. Ken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ealingfox Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 Of course far-right BNP-linked online blogger Guido Fawkes was treated as absolute gospel when he had something to say about Corbyn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Foxin_mad Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 Corbyn is an absolutely massive **** though. A very dangerous one at that. Its funny how people still try to defend him. He thinks the break up of the USSR was a travesty, models his economics on Venuzela who he congratulated on increasing the living standards of millions , he has friends in Hezbollah, Hamas and the IRA. He lets bullying and intimidation run rife inside his party alongside anti-Semitism. People still think this clown is fit to run a country. Teresa May may be a useless old git but she is nothing on that incompetent old ****wit an his team of despicable *****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon the Hat Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 14 minutes ago, Foxin_mad said: Corbyn is an absolutely massive **** though. A very dangerous one at that. Its funny how people still try to defend him. He thinks the break up of the USSR was a travesty, models his economics on Venuzela who he congratulated on increasing the living standards of millions , he has friends in Hezbollah, Hamas and the IRA. He lets bullying and intimidation run rife inside his party alongside anti-Semitism. People still think this clown is fit to run a country. Teresa May may be a useless old git but she is nothing on that incompetent old ****wit an his team of despicable *****. Indeed, and his and momentum's takeover of the Labour party is frankly a bit scary. Imagine if the right wing took over the Tories? Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buce Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 (edited) 47 minutes ago, Strokes said: Ken? Never mind fearing Corbyn - the media barons will be the first up against the wall when I'm in charge. You'll probably get away with re-education. Edited 20 April 2018 by Buce 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buce Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 1 minute ago, Jon the Hat said: Indeed, and his and momentum's takeover of the Labour party is frankly a bit scary. Imagine if the right wing took over the Tories? Jesus. Oh, yeah, imagine that. They might start deporting blacks, stripping away legal aid rights, cutting benefits to the disabled, changing employment laws to suit the bosses, cosying up to the madman in the White House, dismantling the Welfare State... who knows where it might end? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 48 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said: Indeed, and his and momentum's takeover of the Labour party is frankly a bit scary. Imagine if the right wing took over the Tories? Jesus. They'd probably start deporting people for no reason and sending round 'go home' vans. Oh. Wait....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon the Hat Posted 20 April 2018 Share Posted 20 April 2018 Law of unintended consequences my friends. No one intended these Windrush folks to be put in a difficult position, time they sorted it out. The rest of that is your left wing bias kicking in. The right wing of the Tory party is not in control, not by a million miles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts