Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
davieG

Players in someone’s team of the week 2019-20

By davieG, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Carl the Llama

Carl the Llama

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Pereira should be ahead of TAA. Can't really complain at the others.

Yeah there's no way we should only have 1 defender to Liverpool's 3 if this is supposed to be team of the season so far.  We have the best defence so far.

StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Carl the Llama said:

Yeah there's no way we should only have 1 defender to Liverpool's 3 if this is supposed to be team of the season so far.  We have the best defence so far.

Yep.

 

Everyone knows TAA strengths which is going forward. But I think even Pereira is better than him on that this season.

 

Defensively there's no question Pereira is better.

 

Tackles:
Pereira - 54 (best in the league for a defender)

TAA - 15 (5th for Liverpool)

 

Tackles per game:
Pereira - 4.7 
TAA - 1.1

 

Interceptions:
Pereira - 1.8

TAA - 1.5

 

Clearances

Both 2.6

 

Granted the styles of both sides are fairly different but still think it's a fair barometer to compare defensive stats.

 

Tackle Success Percentage:
Pereira - 47/66 - 71.21%

TAA - 11/22 - 50%

 

TAA has been more influential passing - 3.7pg compared to Pereira's 1pg.

 

Dribbling:
Pereira - 22/38 - 57.89%

TAA - 5/19 - 26.32%

 

Aerial Duels:
Pereira - 13/30 - 43.33%

TAA - 4/12 - 33%

 

All the stats taken from this article written on 1st Nov so figures may have changed. But it does paint a vastly superior positive picture in favour of Pereira for this season so far, despite the contrasting styles of how we and Liverpool play.

 

  • Like 1
rachhere

rachhere

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Phube said:

Shearer’s Team of the Season (so far):

 

 

282087B3-F174-4737-A068-8C3F5520C81F.jpeg

Five England players in there, yet only one in our starting XI (and TAA is only just properly getting his claws into the position).

Phube

Phube

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, rachhere said:

Five England players in there, yet only one in our starting XI (and TAA is only just properly getting his claws into the position).


It’s almost like Gareth isn’t picking the team on form! Which can’t be right because he told us he would! :o

  • Haha 1
Yes N'Didi

Yes N'Didi

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, davieG said:

_109818734_garthtotw.png

 

Crooks

I shouldn't be surprised. I know I shouldn't. But he is the biggest crook on a BBC wage.

 

Two defenders who both conceded goals on the weekend, one of whom is a CDM. No reason as to why he put them in, just fluff like 'he was at it again, strutting around selhurst park as if he owned the place', and citing that tjeu kept their calm. How many ariel duels did they win? How many clearances?

 

Moutinho in because he scored a direct free kick. Spends most of the paragraph talking about the inevitability of Cook getting a 2nd yellow and then ends on the fact that Wolves can't keep up their position of 5th, which wouldn't even be surprising considering their campaign last year!

 

Honestly, the laziest and worst pundit around.

  • Haha 1
Guest Cujek

Guest Cujek

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Yes N'Didi said:

I shouldn't be surprised. I know I shouldn't. But he is the biggest crook on a BBC wage.

 

Two defenders who both conceded goals on the weekend, one of whom is a CDM. No reason as to why he put them in, just fluff like 'he was at it again, strutting around selhurst park as if he owned the place', and citing that tjeu kept their calm. How many ariel duels did they win? How many clearances?

 

Moutinho in because he scored a direct free kick. Spends most of the paragraph talking about the inevitability of Cook getting a 2nd yellow and then ends on the fact that Wolves can't keep up their position of 5th, which wouldn't even be surprising considering their campaign last year!

 

Honestly, the laziest and worst pundit around.

I swear he has some kind of dirt on his BBC bosses, I just don't understand how he has a job otherwise

Nicolo Barella

Nicolo Barella

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Yes N'Didi said:

I shouldn't be surprised. I know I shouldn't. But he is the biggest crook on a BBC wage.

 

Two defenders who both conceded goals on the weekend, one of whom is a CDM. No reason as to why he put them in, just fluff like 'he was at it again, strutting around selhurst park as if he owned the place', and citing that tjeu kept their calm. How many ariel duels did they win? How many clearances?

 

Moutinho in because he scored a direct free kick. Spends most of the paragraph talking about the inevitability of Cook getting a 2nd yellow and then ends on the fact that Wolves can't keep up their position of 5th, which wouldn't even be surprising considering their campaign last year!

 

Honestly, the laziest and worst pundit around.

Fernandinho played well though.

  • Like 1
StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Yes N'Didi said:

I shouldn't be surprised. I know I shouldn't. But he is the biggest crook on a BBC wage.

 

Two defenders who both conceded goals on the weekend, one of whom is a CDM. No reason as to why he put them in, just fluff like 'he was at it again, strutting around selhurst park as if he owned the place', and citing that tjeu kept their calm. How many ariel duels did they win? How many clearances?

 

Moutinho in because he scored a direct free kick. Spends most of the paragraph talking about the inevitability of Cook getting a 2nd yellow and then ends on the fact that Wolves can't keep up their position of 5th, which wouldn't even be surprising considering their campaign last year!

 

Honestly, the laziest and worst pundit around.

He barely does give an adequate reason as I'm guessing he doesn't watch every minute of every game. A lot of the time his reasons barely even mention the player chosen. However just because a defender can concede doesn't mean he may not have had a good game or be deserving of inclusion in his TOTW. 

Yes N'Didi

Yes N'Didi

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, StanSP said:

He barely does give an adequate reason as I'm guessing he doesn't watch every minute of every game. A lot of the time his reasons barely even mention the player chosen. However just because a defender can concede doesn't mean he may not have had a good game or be deserving of inclusion in his TOTW. 

 

4 hours ago, Nicolo Barella said:

Fernandinho played well though.

Agreed on both counts. If he used any level of data to back up his stats I think it would make it more understandable. Like you say, barely mentions the player. If I wanted an article on how the match went I’d read the report. I want to know why Fernandinho has a good game, and hopefully any level of basic stat to back it up.

  • Like 2
TiffToff88

TiffToff88

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, StanSP said:

Iheanacho's made it in to Garth Crooks' team. 

Of course he has, he fits the only criteria for Crooks' TOTW - He scored a goal. (Not disagreeing about his inclusion in any way though on this occasion)

Samu

Samu

Posted
Posted (edited)

Someone seriously needs to have a word with Garth Crooks and tell him he actually needs to start watching games before he picks his team of the week. He has half the Man U team in there this week and only Maddison from us. Sure Maddison played well but he wasn’t really our stand out player.

 

Then in the section at the bottom where you can choose your own team, he’s got Vardy, Iheanacho and then of course Ayoze Perez, who put in a fine performance sitting on the bench. None of our defence are in there. It’s a shame you can’t comment on the article because someone needs to tell him he’s an idiot!

Edited by Samu
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...