Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
lcfc043

Top

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Let's not turn on Top ffs.

 

Aim your anger towards the man in charge of the team who fails to change his ways or get with the times. Aim your anger towards the person that vilifies us as fans, as a collective. 

 

It's not worth getting angry at Top. He's not 'complicit'. It's not a fvcking murder lol

 

The club do a lot right, and some wrong. But there's only one person I'll be blaming IF we get relegated and that won't be Top. 

I get your sentiment but you've jumped on the seesaw and you're lacking balance.

 

Of course Top would hold at least some sort of accountability if we got relegated after keeping Rodgers at the helm too long.

 

It's Top that ultimately has control and makes the decisions for the club and relegation would produce many uncomfortable questions. 

Edited by Collymore
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dahnsouff said:

Noit sure why you tagged me, every owner of every business has some inherant responsibility

 

Nobody should turn on Top and its a long long way from turning on someone to them being held accoutnable

 

Well put, it does no good pretending he is some delicate creature who needs protecting. He needs to be told where we are at, and that won't happen if people are just scared to tell it as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rodgers would have been sacked if we had the finances to pay him off. The worrying thing is that if he's not paid off, he - like anyone else with an employment contract - won't just resign and leave for free.

 

The situation is so tight financially that Schmeichel left to help balance the books.

 

Question is, where do we go from here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Top as very culpable on this. He owns the club which he’s pretty much allowed to go from hero to zero.

This is not about loyalty. It’s about running a business. In any other situation, Rodgers would have been sacked weeks ago and Rudkin would have been out for allowing the club to sign the rubbish it has done.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Col city fan said:

I see Top as very culpable on this. He owns the club which he’s pretty much allowed to go from hero to zero.

This is not about loyalty. It’s about running a business. In any other situation, Rodgers would have been sacked weeks ago and Rudkin would have been out for allowing the club to sign the rubbish it has done.

He must take at least some of the flak yes. Or is he an " untouchable" ?

You might think so the way some just seem to ignore his part in this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Babylon said:

For about the 1000 time, wages and infrastructure.

Good days are over unfortunately. We’ve made some absolutely humping decisions on wages / contracts and it’s now time to take the consequences. Mail reporting a £120m loss for previous tax year about to be announced. We’re going to have to take this season, very likely go down, fire sale of anyone who we can get some cash for, and start again with young players and low wages with the parachute payments the only thing from us being completely ****ed. Rodgers has played us an absolute treat the fraud and we can’t pull the trigger 

Edited by Cropwellfox
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no doubt now that it's time. If this situation continues, the fans will turn on Top as well. Right now it's the fanbase vs Rodgers, but the former have to know that we're being listened to.

 

If Rodgers is still here by the Villa game, you can expect protests and signs demanding his departure. At current trajectory, it isn't long before fans invade the pitch in protest. 

 

Top has to move and do so quickly before the entire club becomes too toxic for any decent manager to consider.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Royston. said:

Rodgers position is untenable.

 

If Top really still believes in him then that is a major concern hanging over our owners mindset.

 

If he refuses to get rid because of finances its arguably even worse because we will get relegated for the sake of saving what, 20M???

This 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iancognito said:

Worth remembering he fired Pearson and his Dad re-instated him. Then fired Puel weeks after the Copter crash.

I think they're just in the process of speaking to replacements. It's not if it's when.

Suggests that we may be speaking to managers currently employed, which is interesting. 

 

What's also interesting is that we could quadruple Graham Potter's pay and still be better off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think people - we couldn’t afford a new signing. How the hell are we going to be able to pay for BR to be sacked. Also, if we do somehow manage to scramble the money together to sack him, the only way we get a new manager is by hiring someone who isn’t employed currently as we can’t afford to pay another clubs compensation. 
 

All in all, we’re pretty well ****ed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...