Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
FoxSince88

V Brighton match thread

By FoxSince88, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Matt_Lcfc

Matt_Lcfc

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Shane said:

We should play a diamond if we keep persisting with 4 CM’s. Vardy and Kel up top.

I agree, I accept that we are short of wingers, but you surely do not respond to that by starting two. 
 

I just don’t understand the shape, I assume it’s 4-3-3, but I am not sure as to why you would push Praet out wide - there is absolutely nothing that I have seen which points him to being able to play on the wing.

 

I would either play the diamond or push Iheanacho out wide. It’s non-sensical as I think that Vardy and Kel complement each other really well.

Edited by Matt_Lcfc
  • Like 1
nnfox

nnfox

Posted
Posted

Just proves that Brendan doesn't read FT.  Plenty of well reasoned arguments to start Iheanacho up front in a two, yet this line up is what we get.

 

This is on Brendan if it doesn't go well, not the fans.

Matt_Lcfc

Matt_Lcfc

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tielemans63 said:

Mad that no matter what he does he never starts yet Barnes can play like a pub player for weeks on end and starts every single match.

All because Rodgers has an agenda against players. He seems to fall out with certain people at the club and be too stubborn to change things.

 

It is a massive issue as I think that most people would agree that Soyuncu is better than Amartey and Iheanacho is a better option than Daka / Barnes.

  • Like 1
Matt_Lcfc

Matt_Lcfc

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, UHDrive said:

In these key games I'd rather have vardy on the pitch for his demeanour alone even if he isn't scoring well.

Yeah, so you start him with Iheanacho….

UHDrive

UHDrive

Posted
Posted
Just now, Matt_Lcfc said:

Yeah, so you start him with Iheanacho….

4132 in that case and with Praet on RW it would make sense.

Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Lcfccon said:

Me - “he has to go, awful selection”

Three people sat opposite me - “yes but who for!”

 

:rolleyes:

This point of view makes me laugh

 

If anyone believes they are wise enough to sack the manager, is there anyone better we should ask who the replacement should be?   lol

Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, UHDrive said:

4132 in that case and with Praet on RW it would make sense.

You cannot have proper wingers with 2 up top unless you are prepared to right off the midfield, I am assuming the diamond would not be using wingers by the way 

UHDrive

UHDrive

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Dahnsouff said:

This point of view makes me laugh

 

If anyone believes they are wise enough to sack the manager, is there anyone better we should ask who the replacement should be?   lol

Trick question? Oh go on then.... No cash, No-one! 

Mark

Mark

Posted
Posted
Just now, Dahnsouff said:

You cannot have proper wingers with 2 up top unless you are prepared to right off the midfield, I am assuming the diamond would not be using wingers by the way 

Praet starting makes no sense but then it never has

Kilworthfox

Kilworthfox

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Matt_Lcfc said:

Serious question: what does Iheanacho need to do to start? It’s so evident that one up top isn’t working and he provides that link when Maddison is out.

Run around a bit

Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
Posted
Just now, UHDrive said:

Trick question? Oh go on then.... No cash, No-one! 

Nope, fair question, if you say he should go, you must be well informed, so can reasonably be consulted on who comes in. :dunno:
Or is it now banned to ask questions?

foxfanazer

foxfanazer

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Matt_Lcfc said:

Serious question: what does Iheanacho need to do to start? It’s so evident that one up top isn’t working and he provides that link when Maddison is out.

Sign for a club with a decent manager 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...