Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Happy Fox

Manager for the Championship rebuild - who do you want?

By Happy Fox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Chelmofox

Chelmofox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Tuna said:

Hard to follow what is actually going on here - by the reactions we seem to have appointed Smith AND Parker?

 

In other words there is no news whatsoever just fake ITK tweets and speculation.

Although many think we have appointed Potter and all the other names are just a ruse (Potter is the Maya Jama of management you see).  

Guest Lcfc82

Guest Lcfc82

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Tuna said:

Hard to follow what is actually going on here - by the reactions we seem to have appointed Smith AND Parker?

 

In other words there is no news whatsoever just fake ITK tweets and speculation.

Joint managers

Tommy G

Tommy G

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chelmofox said:

Although many think we have appointed Potter and all the other names are just a ruse (Potter is the Maya Jama of management you see).  

I'd have Maya Jama over all of them

CrispinLA in Texas

CrispinLA in Texas

Posted
Posted

F*** just read an article by Josh Cole in the online FLW Football League World interviewing 3 prominent sports journalists who give reasons why Leicester shouldn't employ Scott Parker........ generally saying that he's not good enough long term and utterly rubbish when managing in the Premier League.....

 

Don't know what to think now.....good enough for the championship but not good enough for the Premier League 🤔

  • Like 1
Chelmofox

Chelmofox

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

F*** just read an article by Josh Cole in the online FLW Football League World interviewing 3 prominent sports journalists who give reasons why Leicester shouldn't employ Scott Parker........ generally saying that he's not good enough long term and utterly rubbish when managing in the Premier League.....

 

Don't know what to think now.....good enough for the championship but not good enough for the Premier League 🤔

Well, then we just sack him right? Do what Bournemouth did and show no mercy. 

Edited by Chelmofox
  • Like 4
  • Popular Post
Strokes

Strokes

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
6 minutes ago, Steve_Walsh5 said:

I would rather have Parker over smith 

I’d rather have HIV than AIDS.

  • Haha 6
HEGGSY

HEGGSY

Posted
Posted

"I'd rather have Parker over Smith"

 

The club are the playing an absolute blinder here, they know Smith would be seen as lazy and uninspiring, so the idea of Scott Parker seems much better. 
 

I'll take it all back if they actually pull their finger out but this is pretty much what I expect they'd want the fan base to be thinking.

  • Like 1
Death by Football

Death by Football

Posted
Posted

I was really against the idea of Scott Parker but if he can get us up and we then bin him off I’m ok with that. 
I’ve come to terms with the fact our next manager is going to be an uninspiring choice. 

  • Like 1
BenTheFox

BenTheFox

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

F*** just read an article by Josh Cole in the online FLW Football League World interviewing 3 prominent sports journalists who give reasons why Leicester shouldn't employ Scott Parker........ generally saying that he's not good enough long term and utterly rubbish when managing in the Premier League.....

 

Don't know what to think now.....good enough for the championship but not good enough for the Premier League 🤔

To be fair, him getting promoted is the priority. If he turns out not to be good enough for the premier league if we get there then we can deal with that. 

  • Like 3
Safestandingfox

Safestandingfox

Posted
Posted

Kieran Mckenna is the one, unfortunately the board are as much use as a nuns unmentionables so it'll be Smith, along with a host of uninspiring signings and finishing outside the play off places. 

  • Popular Post
ClaphamFox

ClaphamFox

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
10 minutes ago, Steve_Walsh5 said:

I would rather have Parker over smith 

I think I'd take Smith over Parker. Both have recent success in getting teams promoted from the Championship but Smith's teams play good football whereas Parker's teams are known to be turgid to watch. Plus, Smith laid the foundations for Villa's current success (which Gerrard did his best to ruin before Emery came in). I think we'd probably build a stronger foundation for the future under Smith - even if he ended up getting sacked midway through a PL season...

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Mickyblueeyes

Mickyblueeyes

Posted
Posted

Imagine taking a week and two games to hire an unemployed manager who would have worked for peanuts. 
 

AND then taking so many weeks after the season to hire one of two unemployed managers who would have happily have taken the job for peanuts. 
 

And some people tell me “at least we are in safe hands”.

  • Haha 1
  • Popular Post
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

Imagine taking a week and two games to hire an unemployed manager who would have worked for peanuts. 
 

AND then taking so many weeks after the season to hire one of two unemployed managers who would have happily have taken the job for peanuts. 
 

And some people tell me “at least we are in safe hands”.

How do you know what we’re paying them ? 
 

I believe that Parker’s agent asked for 60k/week and we’ve negotiated an agreement at 80k 

Edited by st albans fox
  • Haha 7
SouthStandUpperTier

SouthStandUpperTier

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

Imagine taking a week and two games to hire an unemployed manager who would have worked for peanuts. 
 

AND then taking so many weeks after the season to hire one of two unemployed managers who would have happily have taken the job for peanuts. 
 

And some people tell me “at least we are in safe hands”.

Makes me wonder if Maresca is the target and the club are just waiting until Man City's season is finished before announcing.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
PAPA LAZAROU

PAPA LAZAROU

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

Makes me wonder if Maresca is the target and the club are just waiting until Man City's season is finished before announcing.

Why what difference would it make?

  • Like 1
Stinkenzo

Stinkenzo

Posted
Posted

Smith is pretty much this generation's Hughes/Pardew, just totally uninspiring with no obvious style or USP to him. At a time where clubs at this level are (successfully) going for top ex pros early on in their managerial career like Burnley and Blackburn have, we have a lot of potential, the facilities and pretty much the opportunity to start from scratch. Some fans call the situation a mess but to a project-building manager it's an appealing blank canvas. The supposed fact that we aren't interested in anybody who doesn't have PL/Championship experience says a lot about the credentials of our board. Cast the net wide you bastards. 

  • Like 4
Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
Posted (edited)

Percy’s article hasn’t told us anything we didn’t already know! We knew smith was going to be in the running, and Tanner said they spoke to him the other week….. it doesn’t mean he will the chosen…. It means the club have had the decency to at least speak with him. It doesn’t mean a lot in the grand scheme of things. 
 

Personally I think they’re waiting for Man City to complete their final game and then approach Maresca…. Something intrigues me about him and k don’t know why. 

Edited by Pliskin
  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...