Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

Odsonne Edouard joins on loan - Official

By moore_94, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Fox92

Fox92

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

It just gets worse. Never seen a supposed director of football get away with delivering rubbish time and time again.

  • Like 7
  • Popular Post
Claudio Fannieri

Claudio Fannieri

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

What is interesting is who is the source briefing Tom Collomose with this level of insight, it seems whoever it is, is looking to paint club or a certain individual(s) in a poor light, this is only going to further damage Rudkin’s position and reputation amongst the fanbase. 
 

Almost as if there someone who wants to make his position as precarious as possible or even untenable. 

Edited by Claudio Fannieri
  • Like 8
Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

 

Yeah, people like to say "when will people admit Ayew was a good signing !!!!!" he cost us c. £8 million – I refuse to believe we couldn't have gone to a market like Scandinavia and picked up someone a lot younger, on an upward trajectory and with *heaven forbid* sell-on value for around the same price. Nanasi cost Strasbourg around the same ffs. 

 

Bounanotte cost Brighton 5.

 

RizLCFC

RizLCFC

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

What is interesting is who is the source briefing Tom Collomose with this level of insight, it seems whoever it is, is looking to paint club or a certain individual(s) in a poor light, this is only going to further damage Rudkin’s position and reputation amongst the fanbase. 
 

Almost as if there someone who wants to make his position as precarious as possible or even untenable. 

It’s probably someone who is actually telling us the truth, rather than John Percy, who, as reliable as he can be, gets his info from the club and is therefore, telling us what the club want him to tell us.

Edited by RizLCFC
  • Popular Post
goose2010

goose2010

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Knowing Rudkin we will Buy him just so we can loan someone else. 

 

Nowt like having some expensive deadwood on the books. 

  • Haha 9
Mickyblueeyes

Mickyblueeyes

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

What is interesting is who is the source briefing Tom Collomose with this level of insight, it seems whoever it is, is looking to paint club or a certain individual(s) in a poor light, this is only going to further damage Rudkin’s position and reputation amongst the fanbase. 
 

Almost as if there someone who wants to make his position as precarious as possible or even untenable. 

Not neccesarily. It could just be Edouard's agent. These things can be fed in to reporters because Rudkin and co are doing these sort of things. He has made his own position untenable. 

goose2010

goose2010

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

What is interesting is who is the source briefing Tom Collomose with this level of insight, it seems whoever it is, is looking to paint club or a certain individual(s) in a poor light, this is only going to further damage Rudkin’s position and reputation amongst the fanbase. 
 

Almost as if there someone who wants to make his position as precarious as possible or even untenable. 

it is usually a players agent that isnt happy with the club. So wouldnt surprise me if it is someone like Cannons agent 

cruzFOX

cruzFOX

Posted
Posted

Edourde was a big gamble knowing the guy had failed at his last 2 clubs well he did have a decent first season at Celtic. That’s when rogers had his eye on him. The guy has Gond completely off the boil. Looks devoid of all confidence and it would take some massive investment on Rudy’s part to get him going again. We just don’t have the time or energy to revive his career while the roof is on fire. The BIG. Mistake in the contract was not being able to send him back at our choosing. Palace has conned us and now we are screwed!

  • Like 1
StonyFox

StonyFox

Posted
Posted

What a complete waste of money. I'm guessing we could not register him in the league squad and bring in another loan alongside Buonatte, it might encourage palace to take him back if they know he's never going to play, but also never do business with us again. 

 

I hope we knew this before the window opened, but I doubt we bothered to ask the question until now!

KFS

KFS

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, goose2010 said:

Knowing Rudkin we will Buy him just so we can loan someone else. 

 

Nowt like having some expensive deadwood on the books. 

Tbf he’d absolutely slap in the championship. It might not be a bad idea. 

Wasyls Pec Deck

Wasyls Pec Deck

Posted
Posted (edited)

Palace could sell him abroad couldn’t they? I bet we’re covering a lot of what is probably a healthy wage as well. But if you’re Palace and you know leaving him here makes us less able to operate and bring players in (ie another loan) surely that makes sense for them? 
 

Surely it’s good to be suspicious when a rival tries to fill up 1 of 2 loan spots with someone who has really gone off the boil? But no, Rudkin fell for it hook, line and sinker!

Edited by Wasyls Pec Deck
Dan

Dan

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, StanSP said:

'loan fee was significant'. 

 

GET RUDKIN OUT. 

 

 

It's just the most spectacularly badly run club in the league. Doesn't even really annoy me anymore. It's laughable at this point.

  • Like 1
foxfanazer

foxfanazer

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

It just gets worse. Never seen a supposed director of football get away with delivering rubbish time and time again.

It's got to the point where i don't want to hear any news about the club. There's nothing to be positive or optimistic about 

goose2010

goose2010

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, KFS said:

Tbf he’d absolutely slap in the championship. It might not be a bad idea. 

he hasnt played for 2 years really not sure he would. 

 

We thought Daka would and didnt. 

  • Like 2
LFEFox23

LFEFox23

Posted
Posted

Basically I read that as, unless we sort a loan move abroad for the player that matches the same deal we are currently paying - Were stuck with him.

 

Why on this earth would Palace want this cart horse back!

  • Like 1
cityfanlee23

cityfanlee23

Posted
Posted

Wait, so we can't just cancel the loan? We've paid a "significant" fee, and have no right to cancel the loan?
Presumably because we are covering wages and Palace would then end up with those wages on their books?

splinterdream

splinterdream

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

This is the bit I dont understand. When negotiating, what is it that we are paying the significant sum for and why is always us ? Palace did not want him. In fact Palace needed to get rid to get Nketiah in. So why are we paying significant sums of the clubs money to get in a striker who wasnt wanted. He could've gone the other way and been an absolute star for us but the reality is, at the time of getting him across, he wasnt a highly sought after player - they are now risking the clubs future by these ridiculous decisions. 

 

There is no foward planning. There is no contigency. There is no risk awareness. Its not incompetence any more, its negligence. 

Wish Top would read this.

  • Thanks 1
cityfanlee23

cityfanlee23

Posted
Posted
Just now, LFEFox23 said:

Basically I read that as, unless we sort a loan move abroad for the player that matches the same deal we are currently paying - Were stuck with him.

 

Why on this earth would Palace want this cart horse back!

This is the thing, we've paid a fee to take him, and presumably are covering his wages, why would palace agree to take a player back that won't play AND palace then have to start paying his wages. 

Utter madness from this club, this is Dejphon Chansiri levels of club ownership/DOF

  • Like 2
Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LFEFox23 said:

Basically I read that as, unless we sort a loan move abroad for the player that matches the same deal we are currently paying - Were stuck with him.

 

Why on this earth would Palace want this cart horse back!

 

He can only play for Leicester City and/or Crystal Palace until 1/7/25.

 

"Abroad" doesn't matter, it's a FIFA rule. Players can only be registered for two clubs in a season. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 2
splinterdream

splinterdream

Posted
Posted

Does this mean we cannot get another loan?

 

As i read into it, we can only register 2 loans at any 1 time, but can register a maximum of 4 loans in 1 season,

 

So we can de register Edouard to register another, but would still have to pay his wages, some £90k a week. An expensive error again.

moore_94

moore_94

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Finnegan said:

 

He can only play for Leicester City and/or Crystal Palace until 1/7/25.

 

"Abroad" doesn't matter, it's a FIFA rule. Players can only be registered for two clubs in a season. 

 

 

Can be registered for 3 but only play for 2

 

So he could be sold, but just can’t play for them

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...