Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Ian Nacho

Leicester at risk of another Premier League PSR charge over latest accounts

By Ian Nacho, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Bert said:

All the reports are that KDH deal was completed in time to be included in the latest set of accounts. 

We only sold kdh to try and meet psr for last season. We would not have sold him in the summer otherwise.  If for 24/25, we’d have waited till this coming June. 

sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted

Are we going to use.

 

You can't use the last three yrs against us. You tried it once and we was found not guilty.

 

If we are that confident we must have something up our sleeves.

FoxOnWheels

FoxOnWheels

Posted
Posted

Just charge us and throw away the key need to start from scratch the clubs a shambles! W@nk squad losing most weeks, can’t spend any worthwhile money to improve it, relegation looming and then god knows what the efl will do to us 

  • Haha 1
Sunbury Fox

Sunbury Fox

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

We only sold kdh to try and meet psr for last season. We would not have sold him in the summer otherwise.  If for 24/25, we’d have waited till this coming June. 

You always seem well-informed on finance stuff. Is your understanding that the £ for Barnes, Castagne, KDH and Enzo  falls into the June 2023-June 2024 financial period? But not the £ for Maddison?

Muzzy_no7

Muzzy_no7

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Product of 84 said:

Imagine being the first club relegated by PSR because we have a lower threshold due to having been relegated due to a club failing PSR but being penalised the following season. 

This. 

Fox85

Fox85

Posted
Posted

I'm confident that we haven't breached.

 

I think that Everton will breach and this will be their 3rd charge on the bounce which will mean a much harsher set of punishment.

 

Forest will but they we be sound.

 

I think that Leicester are going to be all good nothing to be concerned about.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Bilo

Bilo

Posted
Posted
Just now, Fox85 said:

I'm confident that we haven't breached.

 

I think that Everton will breach and this will be their 3rd charge on the bounce which will mean a much harsher set of punishment.

 

Forest will but they we be sound.

 

I think that Leicester are going to be all good nothing to be concerned about.

I wouldn't be shocked. They were a complete financial mess under the last owners.

Muzzy_no7

Muzzy_no7

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Fox85 said:

I'm confident that we haven't breached.

 

I think that Everton will breach and this will be their 3rd charge on the bounce which will mean a much harsher set of punishment.

 

Forest will but they we be sound.

 

I think that Leicester are going to be all good nothing to be concerned about.

Forest have got away with it due to the blatant PSR cheating deals between them, Newcastle and Lyon. 

  • Popular Post
StriderHiryu

StriderHiryu

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, Ashley said:

This the guy that @StriderHiryu does bits for? If it turns out to be bullshit you need to distance yourself chap.

 

go solo. 

 

47 minutes ago, lcfc_forever said:

Exactly. The analysis @StriderHiryu does is superb, as are some of the other contributors with their insights. Watch it for that, as this kind of clickbait demeans them. 

 

Points taken here. To defend Lox, his intention is to act as a news outlet for all fans. But I get it, if reports are unconfirmed and in this case highly emotional, it can spread negativity and toxicity among the fan base, which just divides us all and causes issues. We had a call-in show tonight and it makes me sad when I see callers call in who are genuinely sad and upset because of what is going on at our club. We don't want to flame the fires and make things worse for everyone!

 

We will take this onboard going forwards. As we sadly see in all aspects of life, Social Media can and does have huge ramifications. In this instance, I want to defend my friend again by saying it was not intentional to clickbait anyone! But we can do better, and hopefully we will do going forwards.

 

 

Edited by StriderHiryu
  • Like 7
Fox85

Fox85

Posted
Posted
Just now, Muzzy_no7 said:

Forest have got away with it due to the blatant PSR cheating deals between them, Newcastle and Lyon. 

If they have good for them.

 

Cleaver business and somthing we should of done.

 

I hate PSR no teams should be punished via points deductions. The owners and financial experts should be charged.

 

No fans should suffer the whole thing is bollocks 

  • Like 3
Wymsey

Wymsey

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Blue-fox said:

Man City being charged?

Think there'll be massive outrage from some quarters.

Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Bilo said:

If we get a deduction, it'll be between 2 and 4 points. The precedent has been set and the breach is relatively small.

Wouldn’t be so certain. 

fox_favourite

fox_favourite

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Bilo said:

If we get a deduction, it'll be between 2 and 4 points. The precedent has been set and the breach is relatively small.

Thats the problem. There isn't a precedent, they make it up as they go along, claiming it's a case by case basis. Something like this needs a clear structure, and not written on the back of a wet tissue covered in cat poo

  • Like 1
EastAnglianFox

EastAnglianFox

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, foxfanazer said:

Not trying to sound edgy but is anybody else not really arsed either way?


Same

 

Club deserves everything it gets with how we’ve been ran into the ground over the last few years.

 

My main annoyance is that our top brass will hide behind the “they are out to get little old Leicester” rather than any of them taking some fvcking accountability.

 

 

  • Like 4
Bilo

Bilo

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, fox_favourite said:

Thats the problem. There isn't a precedent, they make it up as they go along, claiming it's a case by case basis. Something like this needs a clear structure, and not written on the back of a wet tissue covered in cat poo

The PL do. The independent commission doesn't have the skin in the game.

 

PL: 'We want to give Leicester an 8 point deduction.'

IC: 'Why? We gave Forest half that for a bigger breach last season.'

PL: 'They made us look silly in September.'

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...