Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
moore_94

Club will receive written warning about potential fines/prison sentences from Gambling Commission

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 13/02/2025 at 08:47, ClaphamFox said:

There is no chance of prison. This scarcely changes anything. BC Game will be our sponsor for one more season after this and then we’ll have to find a new (hopefully more appropriate) one.

Kanye West needs some positive publicity. An Ed Sheeran type deal.

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)

Board need purging for this alone. A repulsive disgrace

 

Memo to self: Board aren't getting "sacked." Must stop saying that. "Purge" needs to happen

Edited by Clogger_
Posted
2 minutes ago, Clogger_ said:

Board need purging for this alone. A repulsive disgrace

 

Memo to self: Board aren't getting "sacked." Must stop saying that. "Purge" needs to happen

The board are getting internally reviewed. 

 

And the findings might well surprise you.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, foxile5 said:

The board are getting internally reviewed. 

 

And the findings might well surprise you.

With the best will, Top isn't getting sacked

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Are the club still going to hide behind the 'due diligence' they did and back them to the hilt when it's downright obvious they're an illegal company?

  • Like 4
Posted
5 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

It's this that's evaporated the last semblance of connection with me and our club, not the diabolical mismanagement and decline that we've witnessed over recent years. 

 

I don't want anything to do with my football club if this is the lack of morals they have in desperation to raise funds to try and cover up for the horrendous mistakes and financial problems we have.

 

Not for me Clive. Won't spend another penny on our football club until I see evidence of major change (bar taking my son U21 academy games when convenient).

With you on this. 
 

And why are so many kids wearing the shirt with the sponsor on? I thought that wasn’t allowed? 

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

With you on this. 
 

And why are so many kids wearing the shirt with the sponsor on? I thought that wasn’t allowed? 

Possibly the sizing, kids aged 11-12 are probably in adults kits. The sizing is whack.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Possibly the sizing, kids aged 11-12 are probably in adults kits. The sizing is whack.

It’s unbelievable…. I wish people would stop and think about the messages that are being sent out when their kids are walking around with that monstrosity on their shirt.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

With you on this. 
 

And why are so many kids wearing the shirt with the sponsor on? I thought that wasn’t allowed? 

I guess because our club did some long winded way in that you had to buy a shirt online then email them the ****ing ref order to get the logo removed. Rather than just having the kids kits printed without the guff on it from the off.

 

Family club.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/02/2025 at 21:46, Sol thewall Bamba said:

I would say over half of our fans have Stockholm syndrome.

We all 'signed on' to support a football club, not clandestine and questionable deals organised by the spivs now controlling the club. That's all we can expect of each other - to choose whether or not to support our team - the current version of which has, admittedly emerged from the mire created by said spivs.

What saddens me is that it's looking as though Vichai was less than the honourable bloke I believed him to be. Buying a club can be the beginnings of a grand pastime for a millionaire - but that I may have been naive about his motives is v. disappointing. That the 'glad-handing' that went on with the Leicester support may just have been a superficial exercise in cynically getting us onside is worse than disappointing.

It appears that the Prem title and the FA Cup could have been just fortuitous by-products achieved by the Pearson/Walsh team and Claude Puel's assembly of a talented squad placed v. nicely in Rodgers' spawny lap.

That the development side of LCFC has placed itself in hock to Macquarie has been the subject of severe scrutiny by the 'accountants' on here. That aspect appears to have gone 'doggo' lately. Stadium expansion isn't currently going to be filling many of these potential  seats the rate the team's going.

There's a few heads that should be hanging in shame atm but I doubt they'll ever be locked in stocks outside the KP - I can think of a more appropriate statue to be raised there - the usual suspects in striped pyjamas linked together on a chain gang litter picking on the verges of the main thoroughfares out of the City. Out of being the appropriate phrase.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...