Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

Premier League has charged LCFC with an alleged breach of PSR

By moore_94, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

TrentFox

TrentFox

Posted
Posted

I know it’s the done thing in here to blame Rudkin for absolutely everything from covid  to war in Ukraine …… but I find it difficult to believe he makes up the contracts and deals without sign-off from the suits in accounts. Accountancy is likely not his forte and there are a whole host of heads that should also be rolling for this latest screw-up. 😖

  • Like 2
Goldfox

Goldfox

Posted
Posted

Should’ve cracked on with that expansion years ago gew, the extra revenue could have helped with all this Psr stuff we are currently up against!!!

  • Like 2
BeaumontFox

BeaumontFox

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, hejammy said:

They don't want us to stay up, Man City will be deducted points but we will have more points deducted. EPL hates us! 

 

But after all that.................FFS King Power what they hell are you doing!?

That’s not happening for a couple of seasons mate

Dan

Dan

Posted
Posted

At the end of the day the "PSR 🤓" rules as bad as they are can be bypassed simply by recruiting sensibly.

Fazzer 7

Fazzer 7

Posted
Posted

Whealan must also be absolutley useless.The only certainty is her and Rudkin will still be in position come August regardless of what sanctions are handed down. All the overpaid players will still be here, like Coady, Winks etc. All down to Rudkin. Does he have no conscience , if he did he would surely tender his resignation.

AjcW

AjcW

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, TrentFox said:

I know it’s the done thing in here to blame Rudkin for absolutely everything from covid  to war in Ukraine …… but I find it difficult to believe he makes up the contracts and deals without sign-off from the suits in accounts. Accountancy is likely not his forte and there are a whole host of heads that should also be rolling for this latest screw-up. 😖

They can only advise if they're not as senior as him/susan in the hierachy no?

 

Our last FD was poached by Newcastle.... 

Edited by AjcW
lcfc_forever

lcfc_forever

Posted
Posted

The Athletic suggested punishment may be harsher, not because of how far over the limit we are, but because of 'aggravation' rather than accepting the punishment. They also say the PFL will argue the delay in settling the matter this season was caused by the club not submitting their accounts in time. 

 

Looking very difficult for the club :( 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
  • Popular Post
Muzzy_no7

Muzzy_no7

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Meanwhile Chelsea and City get away with it.

 

Forest, Villa, Everton and Newcastle sell eachother players for inflated fees.

 

Villa and Chelsea sell rubbish to Saudi for 100-300% of their market value. 

  • Like 5
Blue-fox

Blue-fox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

Feels like after the enjoyment and celebrations of Vardy's last day at Leicester on Sunday we are heading towards 'The days of Pompeii'

LL0140-019-00_The-Arts-The-Last-Days-of-Pompeii-by-Lord-Lytton.jpg

At the speed the lava flows, still baffles me that people in Pompeii died. 

  • Like 1
VLC86

VLC86

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

Feels like after the enjoyment and celebrations of Vardy's last day at Leicester on Sunday we are heading towards 'The days of Pompeii'

LL0140-019-00_The-Arts-The-Last-Days-of-Pompeii-by-Lord-Lytton.jpg

That was the painting Rebecca gifted Top.

  • Haha 3
VLC86

VLC86

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, lcfc_forever said:

The Athletic suggested punishment may be harsher, not because of how far over the limit we are, but because of 'aggravation' rather than accepting the punishment. They also say the PFL will argue the delay in settling the matter this season was caused by the club not submitting their accounts in time. 

 

Looking very difficult for the club :( 

Just read this…

 

Likely to be at least -12 points with transfer embargo and forced sales lol 

StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, lcfc_forever said:

The Athletic suggested punishment may be harsher, not because of how far over the limit we are, but because of 'aggravation' rather than accepting the punishment. They also say the PFL will argue the delay in settling the matter this season was caused by the club not submitting their accounts in time. 

 

Looking very difficult for the club :( 

I very much doubt The Athletic know anything about our punishment. 

  • Like 1
fazzyfox

fazzyfox

Posted
Posted

Longer term is it in any way encouraging that in January they said there was wiggle room in the budget to bring another player in but they couldn't find one for their budget (tuppence h'apenny and an acorn) who they all felt would improve the side. So in that sense the 24-25 season is either in their within budget range or it'll turn out they got that calculation wrong too and we don't even have that news to look forward to in the next set of figures and 3 year figures :dunno: 

Muzzy_no7

Muzzy_no7

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, VLC86 said:

Just read this…

 

Likely to be at least -12 points with transfer embargo and forced sales lol 

The price we will pay for daring to challenge the ‘elite’. 
 

Keep an eye on Forest and Villa over the coming years. 

urban.spaceman

urban.spaceman

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Blue-fox said:

At the speed the lava flows, still baffles me that people in Pompeii died. 

If only they’d run fast they would have still been with us. 

  • Haha 1
Ricey

Ricey

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Number 6 said:

It definitely may prove to be a costly gamble. One of the downsides of the points deduction penalties is that each punished will be affected differently. I can see why we've tried to kick the can town the road.

 

Of course, while we had successfully done that we should have been getting the finances in order at the same time.

Confirmation here on The Athletic article that the club were fighting both jurisdiction cases (that the PL had no right to rule on 22/23 AND 23/24). That's why there was the delay. If we hadn't fought the second case, we would have had the points deduction this season.

"But because Leicester refused to submit their 2023-24 accounts to the Premier League by December 31 2024, and then proceeded to fight these two jurisdiction battles, there is no chance of the Premier League being able to prosecute the club this season."

 

Great work everyone.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Blue-fox

Blue-fox

Posted
Posted
Just now, urban.spaceman said:

If only they’d run fast they would have still been with us. 

Pretty sure some of them would have moved faster than the double pivot of Ndidi and Soumare 

  • Haha 1
HankMarvin

HankMarvin

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

 

Villa and Chelsea sell rubbish to Saudi for 100-300% of their market value. 

Nobody wanted Daka for a Twix

Edited by HankMarvin
urban.spaceman

urban.spaceman

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, lcfc_forever said:

The Athletic suggested punishment may be harsher, not because of how far over the limit we are, but because of 'aggravation' rather than accepting the punishment. They also say the PFL will argue the delay in settling the matter this season was caused by the club not submitting their accounts in time. 

 

Looking very difficult for the club :( 

The ‘aggravation’ of demanding the Premier League and EFL stick to their own rules instead of just lying down and accepting a punishment they had no right to give to us.

 

Unfit to govern. 

  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...