Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
OntarioFox

Premier League 2025/26 Thread

By OntarioFox, in General Football and Sport

Recommended Posts

Torquay Gunner

Torquay Gunner

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, filbertway said:

Think he's done a good job there. Been relatively consistently one of the best teams in the country in his time there and have improved their facilities. 

 

He's left them in a fantastic position as a club. And according to the people that regularly slate him it should not be hard at all to find someone that can elevate them to being a regular title chasing team now.

They have been the nearly men for the last decade or so, as far as cup competitions are concerned, but never seriously threatened to win the title. Very similar to Arteta, shorter time span of course and tbf Arsenal did come within 2 points of winning it.

Torquay Gunner

Torquay Gunner

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Footballwipe said:

Deliriously popular to hate on Levy, and he's not been perfect by any means. But their new stadium is his shining legacy by far. It is incredible, it's a 365 days a year stadium that will help Spurs' financial footing for decades to come. Matchday revenue, concerts and events taking place. The stadium debt was refinanced a few years ago, and the amount they take in will always mean it's serviceable.

 

They might well get a new chairman who brings them success on the field with a stable manager etc, but that stadium will be vital to any future success. Also worth noting that they built it just at the right time, imagine what it'd cost to build it now.

I would have liked him to stay for a few years longer tbh. 

jammie82uk

jammie82uk

Posted
Posted

Man City and Premier League settle dispute over Associated Party Transaction rules
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/32461/13427191/man-city-and-premier-league-settle-dispute-over-associated-party-transaction-rules
 

Manchester City and the Premier League have reached a settlement in their dispute over the rules governing Associated Party Transactions (APTs).

This legal action is separate to the one covering more than 100 charges against City for alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules. The club deny the charges.

 

It remains unknown when a judgement on that case will be announced.

 

City had launched arbitration proceedings on January 20 against the current rules, which are designed to ensure that deals between clubs and entities linked to their ownership are done at fair market value.

It was set to go to trial in October, but the settlement agreement means this will not be necessary.

 

City's challenge was understood to have included criticism of the way the Premier League treated shareholder loans under the rules. The league and City have agreed to make no further comment on the matter.

 

What are the Associated Party Transaction rules?

 

The Premier League's rules require any club, its players, manager or any 'senior official' to run dealings with 'associated parties' past them.

'Associated parties' are companies or people who have a significant interest in the relevant club, financially or otherwise.

The Premier League's board then reviews each transaction to assess whether it believes they represent a fair market value.

The league says the rule helps to build 'fairness' across the division by ending a 'reliance on enhanced commercial revenues linked to the club's ownership'.

 

In a statement Man City said: "The Premier League and Manchester City FC have reached a settlement in relation to the arbitration commenced by the club earlier this year concerning the Premier League's Associated Party Transaction (APT) Rules and as a result the parties have agreed to terminate the proceedings.

 

"This settlement brings an end to the dispute between the parties regarding the APT Rules. As part of the settlement, Manchester City accepts that the current APT Rules are valid and binding.

 

"It has been agreed that neither the Premier League nor the club will be making any further comment about the matter."

The Premier League also released a statement, confirming the settlement.

 

"The Premier League and Manchester City FC have reached a settlement in relation to the arbitration commenced by the club earlier this year concerning the Premier League's Associated Party Transaction (APT) Rules, and as a result the parties have agreed to terminate the proceedings.


"This settlement brings an end to the dispute between the parties regarding the APT Rules. As part of the settlement, Manchester City accepts that the current APT Rules are valid and binding.


"It has been agreed that neither the Premier League nor the club will be making any further comment about the matter."

Trent Steel

Trent Steel

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, jammie82uk said:

Man City and Premier League settle dispute over Associated Party Transaction rules
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/32461/13427191/man-city-and-premier-league-settle-dispute-over-associated-party-transaction-rules
 

Manchester City and the Premier League have reached a settlement in their dispute over the rules governing Associated Party Transactions (APTs).

This legal action is separate to the one covering more than 100 charges against City for alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules. The club deny the charges.

 

It remains unknown when a judgement on that case will be announced.

 

City had launched arbitration proceedings on January 20 against the current rules, which are designed to ensure that deals between clubs and entities linked to their ownership are done at fair market value.

It was set to go to trial in October, but the settlement agreement means this will not be necessary.

 

City's challenge was understood to have included criticism of the way the Premier League treated shareholder loans under the rules. The league and City have agreed to make no further comment on the matter.

 

What are the Associated Party Transaction rules?

 

The Premier League's rules require any club, its players, manager or any 'senior official' to run dealings with 'associated parties' past them.

'Associated parties' are companies or people who have a significant interest in the relevant club, financially or otherwise.

The Premier League's board then reviews each transaction to assess whether it believes they represent a fair market value.

The league says the rule helps to build 'fairness' across the division by ending a 'reliance on enhanced commercial revenues linked to the club's ownership'.

 

In a statement Man City said: "The Premier League and Manchester City FC have reached a settlement in relation to the arbitration commenced by the club earlier this year concerning the Premier League's Associated Party Transaction (APT) Rules and as a result the parties have agreed to terminate the proceedings.

 

"This settlement brings an end to the dispute between the parties regarding the APT Rules. As part of the settlement, Manchester City accepts that the current APT Rules are valid and binding.

 

"It has been agreed that neither the Premier League nor the club will be making any further comment about the matter."

The Premier League also released a statement, confirming the settlement.

 

"The Premier League and Manchester City FC have reached a settlement in relation to the arbitration commenced by the club earlier this year concerning the Premier League's Associated Party Transaction (APT) Rules, and as a result the parties have agreed to terminate the proceedings.


"This settlement brings an end to the dispute between the parties regarding the APT Rules. As part of the settlement, Manchester City accepts that the current APT Rules are valid and binding.


"It has been agreed that neither the Premier League nor the club will be making any further comment about the matter."

Lol this is when you will slowly see all the charges against Man city slowly fade away...

davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, jammie82uk said:

Man City and Premier League settle dispute over Associated Party Transaction rules
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/32461/13427191/man-city-and-premier-league-settle-dispute-over-associated-party-transaction-rules
 

Manchester City and the Premier League have reached a settlement in their dispute over the rules governing Associated Party Transactions (APTs).

This legal action is separate to the one covering more than 100 charges against City for alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules. The club deny the charges.

 

It remains unknown when a judgement on that case will be announced.

 

City had launched arbitration proceedings on January 20 against the current rules, which are designed to ensure that deals between clubs and entities linked to their ownership are done at fair market value.

It was set to go to trial in October, but the settlement agreement means this will not be necessary.

 

City's challenge was understood to have included criticism of the way the Premier League treated shareholder loans under the rules. The league and City have agreed to make no further comment on the matter.

 

What are the Associated Party Transaction rules?

 

The Premier League's rules require any club, its players, manager or any 'senior official' to run dealings with 'associated parties' past them.

'Associated parties' are companies or people who have a significant interest in the relevant club, financially or otherwise.

The Premier League's board then reviews each transaction to assess whether it believes they represent a fair market value.

The league says the rule helps to build 'fairness' across the division by ending a 'reliance on enhanced commercial revenues linked to the club's ownership'.

 

In a statement Man City said: "The Premier League and Manchester City FC have reached a settlement in relation to the arbitration commenced by the club earlier this year concerning the Premier League's Associated Party Transaction (APT) Rules and as a result the parties have agreed to terminate the proceedings.

 

"This settlement brings an end to the dispute between the parties regarding the APT Rules. As part of the settlement, Manchester City accepts that the current APT Rules are valid and binding.

 

"It has been agreed that neither the Premier League nor the club will be making any further comment about the matter."

The Premier League also released a statement, confirming the settlement.

 

"The Premier League and Manchester City FC have reached a settlement in relation to the arbitration commenced by the club earlier this year concerning the Premier League's Associated Party Transaction (APT) Rules, and as a result the parties have agreed to terminate the proceedings.


"This settlement brings an end to the dispute between the parties regarding the APT Rules. As part of the settlement, Manchester City accepts that the current APT Rules are valid and binding.


"It has been agreed that neither the Premier League nor the club will be making any further comment about the matter."

Surely other clubs need to know the basis of the settlement if it clarifies the rule. Also they need to know if any punishment has been agreed and what it consists of. 

  • Like 1
Fox in the North

Fox in the North

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LFox99 said:

https://www.record.pt/internacional/paises/inglaterra/nottingham-forest/detalhe/nuno-espirito-santo-esta-de-saida-do-nottingham-forest?ref=HP_Ultimas

Get Ten Hag in, or Mourinho - someone to really get on with the players.

I for one look forward to the absolute shitshow

I really really hope that this is the shitshow we’re expecting. I’d be so annoyed if they manage to wriggle out of this.

Super_horns

Super_horns

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Stadt said:

It’ll be Postecoglu and it’ll be glorious disaster 

A very different sort of manager tactically. 

 

Seems the owner and Edu want a more attacking style of football.

 

 

Edited by Super_horns
Cincinnati Fox

Cincinnati Fox

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

A very different sort of manager tactically. 

 

Seems the owner and Edu want a more attacking style of football.

 

 

Notts forests players with ange will be a disaster
And I would love to see it!

Super_horns

Super_horns

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, The Bear said:

So Marinakis chose chaos. 

Seems like a classic case of an owner and new DoF going over the head of the manager on recruitment who then speaks out of turn due to frustration so he gets the tin can .

All rather familiar !

Edited by Super_horns
OntarioFox

OntarioFox

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, LFox99 said:

https://www.record.pt/internacional/paises/inglaterra/nottingham-forest/detalhe/nuno-espirito-santo-esta-de-saida-do-nottingham-forest?ref=HP_Ultimas

Get Ten Hag in, or Mourinho - someone to really get on with the players.

I for one look forward to the absolute shitshow

I'd like them to get Steve Cooper back in, since they kept insisting he was a brilliant manager let down by us. Go on, put your money where your mouth is.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...