Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, suffolk fox said:

why weren't we in for Adam Armstrong at Saints?  At least he can score goals.  With our love in for ex Saints don't know why?

Because he costs money

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted

What frustrates me about things like this is that these sort of players are doomed from the start.

 

Everything about this signing obviously stinks and the fans can smell it from a mile away. So this lad is clearly coming into a situation where he will have literally zero room for judgment. The fans will (rightly) condemn a signing like this from the outset whereas you'd think the club would at least try to get someone that will let the fans get excited about.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, suffolk fox said:

why weren't we in for Adam Armstrong at Saints?  At least he can score goals.  With our love in for ex Saints don't know why?

Just the small figure of £9 million which I think is far too much money for a player that has never been a proven PL forward. Let's be honest even Southampton didn't want him last season in the PL.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, PSR Fox said:

Just the small figure of £9 million which I think is far too much money for a player that has never been a proven PL forward. Let's be honest even Southampton didn't want him last season in the PL.

But we’re a bottom half Champ club? Far better than we’ve got…

Posted

Southampton are confident enough to give us this player until the end of the season whilst covering a portion of his enormous wages, and we are within 2 point of them in the table. The joke is well and truly on us. Again.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, suffolk fox said:

why weren't we in for Adam Armstrong at Saints?  At least he can score goals.  With our love in for ex Saints don't know why?

Because the likes of active premier league clubs like Wolves are after him. Clubs that can afford the capital out leigh on a fee on large loan fee.

 

We cannot afford to compete this side of our likely PSR breach and we literally are scrapping the barrel of average players available on loan that most teams don't want. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Because he costs money

Archer was going in loan to rangers. I’d have been far more interested in him tbh 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 31/01/2026 at 16:33, FLAN said:

From a saints fan 

 

No he’s terrible, slow, useless. No future down here, think his contracts up in the summer

He'll fit in perfectly in that case.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I think he’s going to be okay, just enough that we sign him in the summer before he shits the bed like the rest of them and sits in seagrave as the new soumare on his 4 year deal 

Edited by Lambert09
Posted

So I think I have a little bit of an idea why he’s being targeted. 
 

one of the most obvious issues we have, is the large gap between our midfield and attack. Joe Aribo is good at one thing really, ball progressing. I can only assume that he’s being brought in to help move us further up the field without having to just ping the ball out wide and expect our wingers to get past 3 men before we can actually get into the final 3rd. 
 

as awful as he is, this has to be the reason why?! 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...