Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, Walshy5 said:

Also heard a rumour we were looking at Dean Elgar but ain't he like 40?!

Think that's an old one as he retired yesterday.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Also heard whispers around the ground that Handscombe might not have to count as an overseas next year but don't know how true that is. Would be handy though. 

Posted
18 hours ago, Ted Maul said:

Lost our on-field leader in Handscomb too. We lost our way at times in the first half of the season- might have picked up a few more points with him around. 

Definitely missed his calmness and would have been a buffer between players and the coach, missed his experience too. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Are we mostly positive about this season?

 

We didn't finish bottom and would have stayed up without the deduction. Got to another one day final. 


T20 was horrific but seem to have given up on that in recent years.

 

I guess the clouds are all the 'fallings out' that have been rumoured. 

 

Personally didn't think we'd get a point so to get 111 (well... more) was pretty impressive lol 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, harpendenfox said:

A missed opportunity. Glamorgan stayed up comfortably. Handscomb was clearly a huge loss, although Weatherald and Kelly contributed good runs. Ajaz Patel was a total waste as an overseas. The decline of Hull has been sad to witness. Rehan simply hasn't played enough due to IPL and England squad duties. I'd argue he needs a full season playing for us, batting at three and bowling loads of overs. Davey's lack of playing time has been a problem. Eskenazi's second half of the season was pretty awful, as was Tatersall all season. Gumbs has technique issues. Hamza was excellent in the 50 over game, but disappointing in the 4 day games, but has the potential to be a great signing. Rishi's form fell of a cliff from mid summer.

 

Our best player has been Cox, but remarkably we don't seem to want to retain him.

 

So in summary we've had some bad luck and some good moments, but I do think we our create our own problems at times.

Agreed, though my vote goes to Ian Holland. I think he's close to top wicket taker in all three formats, despite having a spell out for the MLS.

Posted

https://www.cricinfo.com/story/peter-handscomb-i-don-t-want-to-be-known-as-just-a-player-of-spin-1556021

 

There's a good interview here with Pete Handscomb. The reason he missed this season was because of the birth of his daughter and wanting to spend time at home. Unfortunately for us it looks like he's back in the mix for Australian selection, both for their tour of India, but then the Ashes next summer. Hence why he's been selected as captain of the current A tour.

Posted
39 minutes ago, The whole world smiles said:

ECB clearly did not act legally and are now panicking! 

What a mess! They are clearly not fit to adjudicate. I think this seriously undermines the ECB decision and we have good reason to continue to challenge. Watch out Essex! 

Posted (edited)

We all know they'll give us just enough points back to keep us down! And lets be honest, with the players we're losing we'd get spanked in Division 1 next year so relegation would not be the end of the world.

Edited by Walshy5
Posted
6 hours ago, MaidstoneFox said:

https://www.cricinfo.com/story/peter-handscomb-i-don-t-want-to-be-known-as-just-a-player-of-spin-1556021

 

There's a good interview here with Pete Handscomb. The reason he missed this season was because of the birth of his daughter and wanting to spend time at home. Unfortunately for us it looks like he's back in the mix for Australian selection, both for their tour of India, but then the Ashes next summer. Hence why he's been selected as captain of the current A tour.

He's always around the squad whenever they need someone decent at playing spin

Posted
1 hour ago, CL Fox said:

Keep seeing stuff about a falling out with Cox but they just cant afford to keep him. 

Doesn't have another county to go to at present. So I was told. Youd think hed be snapped up tbh 

Posted
17 hours ago, Walshy5 said:

We all know they'll give us just enough points back to keep us down! And lets be honest, with the players we're losing we'd get spanked in Division 1 next year so relegation would not be the end of the world.

Personally I think it will be all 19 back or nothing. Can’t see how it will be anything else as there is nothing about that in the rules.

Posted
1 minute ago, David Lowe said:

Personally I think it will be all 19 back or nothing. Can’t see how it will be anything else as there is nothing about that in the rules.

The bit that bothers me most is the suspended sentence. It seems unfair to have this hanging over us at the beginning of next season. Surely the system is in place that would penalise any further contravention next season anyway, so what is the point? And what are the terms of that additional deduction? In what circumstances and by whom would this be made?? This just seems utterly vindictive to me.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I actually don't want all the points back there is no financial benefit to being in division 1 over 2 and I think it's better for the rebuild that will happen over the next two years to start in division 2 again. 

 

Also from a supporter perspective games against sides with such obvious gulfs in class especially in the bowling ie Warwickshire are quite boring to watch. 

 

A good result would be the suspended points and 5 grand back. 

Edited by The whole world smiles
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...