AjcW Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Apparently thats his misses. Was from this funny football blog, that said "Despite Being an ugly Dog shit footballer, he's managed to pull this".
Suffolk_fox Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 We have some players who are not in the first choice for starting a game, but we'd be gutted if they went!! Sometimes a player just doesn't fit into a manager's plans, doesn't make him a bad player! Regarding the OP, yes I can see why a lot of people were sceptical, we do get a ton of bullshit on here - but the OP shouldn't be so touchy! Thanks for the info though mate!
C-man Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 1107: News just in: Leicester are set to sign Ipswich's Republic of Ireland international defender Alex Bruce on loan until the end of the season.
Suffolk_fox Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 1107: News just in: Leicester are set to sign Ipswich's Republic of Ireland international defender Alex Bruce on loan until the end of the season. Fook me!!! Next thing you'll be telling me we've gone and sold Lineker...
C-man Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Fook me!!! Next thing you'll be telling me we've gone and sold Lineker... Can't quite work out if that's a dig at me or the BBC.
Corky Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Don't know enough about him to make a considered judgement, I'll just trust the manager
Edmund Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 From The Sun LEICESTER have swooped to sign Ipswich defender Alex Bruce, 26, on loan for the rest of the season.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 probably a good signing i would say but i think we need a creative midfielder and a forward who will score goals - stating the obvious i lnow!!!
Trav Le Bleu Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Surely we can get better loan players? If it's on loan we want Premiership players who are idling on the sidelines, not players from the same division as us.
Ric Flair Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 I've always thought Bruce is absolute pony. I hope to be proved wrong, but he's not the signing i'd hoped for. Morrison and Hobbs were quality on Saturday and Brown, although is a liability at times, is hard to play against for some strikers. Pointless signing IMO.
Webbo Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 It kind of suggests that Tunchev won't be available this season.
dandannieldanok Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Pointless signing IMO. Don't see how it's pointless, maybe if we were signing him permanently I'd agree but he's only coming on loan. With Tunchev out and Neilson struggling for form I welcome the addition of a centre and right defender, and I welcome it even more that it is just a loan to tide us over rather than lumping big wages on the likes of Martin Taylor.
Ric Flair Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Don't see how it's pointless, maybe if we were signing him permanently I'd agree but he's only coming on loan. With Tunchev out and Neilson struggling for form I welcome the addition of a centre and right defender, and I welcome it even more that it is just a loan to tide us over rather than lumping big wages on the likes of Martin Taylor. I'd rather take a gamble on O'Neill or Parkes if we need cover.
dandannieldanok Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 I'd rather take a gamble on O'Neill or Parkes if we need cover. Fair enough, but as everyone else is going to bash Bruce on probably the back of maybe once they've ever seen him play, then based on the 45 minute display I saw of O'Neill against Sheff Utd, then we're in big trouble if we need to use him.
Manwell Pablo Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Fair enough, but as everyone else is going to bash Bruce on probably the back of maybe once they've ever seen him play, then based on the 45 minute display I saw of O'Neill against Sheff Utd, then we're in big trouble if we need to use him. Seen him play loads of times, remember one particualr game where we beat Ipswitch 3-1, he was diabolical.
Fox92 Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Fair enough, but as everyone else is going to bash Bruce on probably the back of maybe once they've ever seen him play, then based on the 45 minute display I saw of O'Neill against Sheff Utd, then we're in big trouble if we need to use him. Agreed. I know everyone is slating him, and although the Ipswich fans are not keen on him, surely he'll be ok for what he is coming to do and that is to cover for our current defence, isn't it? Lets judge him after he has played for us. [even if he cant get infront of Damien Delaney and Gareth McAuley...]
Collymore Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Has this actually been confirmed officially yet?
breadandcheese Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 If this signing's to cover us for injuries, then fair enough, he'll come in and do a job. We currently only have 3 proper centre-backs (with Tunchev's injury), so we need a fourth.
David Guiza Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Seen him play loads of times, remember one particualr game where we beat Ipswitch 3-1, he was diabolical. That was 4 years ago. Players can improve.
Manwell Pablo Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 That was 4 years ago. Players can improve. They can get worse as well, ::see Alex Bruce::
Hitesh Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 Has this actually been confirmed officially yet? Are you seriously expecting something from the OS before 5PM?
Liamlcfc1 Posted 1 February 2010 Posted 1 February 2010 confirmed http://www.lcfc.com/page/LatestNews/0,,10274~1951898,00.html
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.