Al-aLondon-Foxile Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Obviously the Thai team weren't much of a threat upfront, and Sven used the 2nd half to look at more players - but we controlled the game Had a couple of goals disallowed and hit the woodwork twice I think, could easily have been 6-0 There are many harder games than hull at home! I'll take that & 3 points next week, no problems. More pleasing than that was the effort being put in by the lads and although the humidity got to them at the end they never stopped running and creating chances. Faz is reportedly sergeant major like and it looks like its having an early effect. The team also retained their shape, there was none of the headless chicken football when the Thai team had a 5min spell, everyone knew what their job was and stuck to it. I just wish we had an easier game than against Hull so as we could build confidence further & some momentum, if we lose we could be back on the bottom and all the negativity that breeds wiping out the excellent work done in Thailand All in all, I'm growing more confident that the season could finally be heading in the right direction and that the battling 2nd half against Scunny wasn't just a player reaction to the changes
Benji Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Whereabouts was the Singha logo? Anyone got a pic? As said above it was in the top left corner of the shirt. As a whole looked awfully cluttered and busy, especially as it was already linear. Without something on the right corner is just looks unbalanced and weird. Very respectable performance, heres to the Hull game.
Corky Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 And Fryatt Possibly, with him being suspended currently, Sven wanted to see how an available front pairing would work. I'm probably chatting crap though.
Fox You Forest Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Fryatt couldn't play because of his ban, Dyer and Vitor didn't play because of knocks in training.
AmyLGK Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Fryatt couldn't play because of his ban, Dyer and Vitor didn't play because of knocks in training. Thanks
Matt Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Whereabouts was the Singha logo? Anyone got a pic? Top left of the shirt, looked abit silly to me really.
Koke Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 heres the goals if you missed them. http://www.livesoccertv.com/match/166549/thailand-vs-leicester-city/ I like how they pronounce Paul Gallagher's name.
Solihullfox Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Ah kack i thought this was tonight. It was in Thailand - tricky thing these world time zones.
Walshy5 Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Fryatt couldn't play because of his ban, Dyer and Vitor didn't play because of knocks in training. Didnt think this would apply for a friendly match.
Jackirius Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 It was in Thailand - tricky thing these world time zones. Na i just thought it was 11 pm tonight and not last night :L Why were you in Thailand? Holiday?
Fox You Forest Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Didnt think this would apply for a friendly match. Suspended from all football until the Club have completed 3 first team matches for a Sending Off in a match played on 28/09/2010.
Matt Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Didnt think this would apply for a friendly match. It's pathetic mate not that I'm too bothered he missed out today but he wasn't allowed to play today because of his ban but this match didn't count against 1 of his 3 match bans. **According to Stringer in his commentary. Like I said not too bothered he didn't play today (Keeps him risk free of injury I suppose) but imo it's either one or the other - He plays in a friendy, OR he's banned but it counts as one of the 3 matches.
Mack Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Surely if he could not play because of the ban then it would count as 1 of his3 games?
MPH Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 classy finish from Waghorn, especially considering he is left footed and good finish again from Gallagher... Poor goalkeeper though it has to be said...
Matt Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Surely if he could not play because of the ban then it would count as 1 of his3 games? It was according to Stringer during his commentary so can't take it as gospel, as you know what he's like.
Houdini Logic Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Na i just thought it was 11 pm tonight and not last night :L It was 11am this morning UK time
cc_star Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 Surely if he could not play because of the ban then it would count as 1 of his3 games? It was a FIFA sanctioned game, and because his red card was for violent conduct it meant he wasn't able to be picked. It's not that he was banned for this game & therefore taking up one of his matches, it's just that he was ineligible for selection. Answer to others Dyer & Vitor suffered a knock in training and weren't worth risking.
Guest Bilo Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 On the plus side, this game does mean that Fryatt will only be banned for one more league game instead of two. Good result in tough conditions and the best way to start Sven's reign, no matter what the opposition. Lovely finishes from Waggy and Gallagher as well.
sdb Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 On the plus side, this game does mean that Fryatt will only be banned for one more league game instead of two. Good result in tough conditions and the best way to start Sven's reign, no matter what the opposition. Lovely finishes from Waggy and Gallagher as well. are you sure about that?
Guest Bilo Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 are you sure about that? If he was banned today because of his red card, that means that two of his three matches banned have banned (Scunny and Thailand) meaning he should only have to serve a ban in the Hull game and come back for Swansea.
Kent Posted 9 October 2010 Posted 9 October 2010 If he was banned today because of his red card, that means that two of his three matches banned have banned (Scunny and Thailand) meaning he should only have to serve a ban in the Hull game and come back for Swansea. The reason people are doubting is because stringer said that it won't count. Although to be fair it would be logical for it to be 1 of his 3 games.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.