Arkie Bennett Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Surely it's better to take the opinion of the Albion fan who's seen him fairly regularly than that of yourself who's had a brief glimpse at some cameo appearances against us? Yes, that's why I included it in my comment, I was trying to be fair.
The Padster Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 What a thread. Tilley is winding people up wonderfully and nobody can see it. If people actually read his posts they would see this, but most just 'ave a gander and start frothing over the keyboard 'cause someone said something remotely negative about their darling player. S'quite funny from my end!
hackneyfox Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Here , here. Discussions/arguments going round and round in circles as to which of our current goalies or strikers should play when it is quite clear that Sven doesn't actually rate any of them that highly.
nickelbyfox Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Here , here. Discussions/arguments going round and round in circles as to which of our current goalies or strikers should play when it is quite clear that Sven doesn't actually rate any of them that highly. Hahaha too true
darko2k7 Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 So If what we are lead to believe is true that we are getting Bednar and Kirkland in on loan, then that will make six players on loan. Now I think im right in saying that you are only allowed five in your match day squad , so who to drop is now the Question, I know Vitor is injured and is the easy pick but he will be back soon and then it is going to be a tough choice until January if or when we sign one or two permanently !
hackneyfox Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Better to have that problem than being forced to pick a side that would have to include 5 from Weale/Logan/Ikeme/Morrisson/Hobbs/Berner/neilson/Lamey/Fryatt/Waghorn/Howard
Dan Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 So If what we are lead to believe is true that we are getting Bednar and Kirkland in on loan, then that will make six players on loan. Now I think im right in saying that you are only allowed five in your match day squad , so who to drop is now the Question, I know Vitor is injured and is the easy pick but he will be back soon and then it is going to be a tough choice until January if or when we sign one or two permanently ! Vitor doesn't count towards the six, as he's on loan from a foreign side. I personally think that's a joke of a rule, but there you go.
Ric Flair Posted 23 November 2010 Author Posted 23 November 2010 I will delete any further posts or threads about how many fookin people we can have on loan. It's been done to death and if you still don't understand it then why worry yourself over it, do you really think Sven and our club will continue to bring players in on loan if we can't play them? Enough.
Finnegan Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 I will delete any further posts or threads about how many fookin people we can have on loan. It's been done to death and if you still don't understand it then why worry yourself over it, do you really think Sven and our club will continue to bring players in on loan if we can't play them? Enough. ... ... So Vitor doesn't count because he's foreign?
darko2k7 Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Vitor doesn't count towards the six, as he's on loan from a foreign side. I personally think that's a joke of a rule, but there you go. O right ,well you learn something new every day. Cheers for the info I will delete any further posts or threads about how many fookin people we can have on loan. It's been done to death and if you still don't understand it then why worry yourself over it, do you really think Sven and our club will continue to bring players in on loan if we can't play them? Enough. It's not that don't understand the rule , It's just I did not know forgin players didn't count towards the five ( although I think they should ) I hadn't read any previous thread's coving this subject so did not know
davieG Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 It's all foreign to me. By the way he's not singing.
hackneyfox Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Who's not singing, and what isn't he singing?
hackneyfox Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Serious question though, sorry if I have missed it elsewhere. Does the foreign bit apply to the player or the club he has come from?
davieG Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Who's not singing, and what isn't he singing? Well not until he scores
Haydos Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/west-bromwich-albion-fc/2010/11/23/roman-bednar-close-to-albion-exit/
Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 On a bednar roses..... Czech mate.
5waller5 Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Tilley why are you trying to wind everyone up? And i suppose you would do a better job than howard up top then? Why is it that not rating Howard is seen as trying to wind people up on here??? Howard is useless in my opinion .... his effort is restricted to winning flick ons and chasing a lost cause every twenty minutes or so. It's the tactic of an unfit sunday league big man up front - and I should know - i was one!!! He cannot actually jump off the floor so fails to reach most headers when attacking the ball ... he is slow, clumsy and ineffective. But we love him because he fouls people on the half way line and looks like he cares by moaning and throwing his arms about - it's the same con that Savage pulled off - run at lost causes across the width of the pitch, and nearly get there, two or three times a game and people will believe that you've put effort in the whole game. In fact the times that we need some movement he is stood either admiring his last contribution or is on his heels. Just watch him for a full 90 minutes - focus on what he is offering the team whilst you watch him - I guarantee you will change your mind about him - and maybe see that you can have a better side in it without a sunday league player up-front. I posted the above before reading the thread to the end ..... probably will read to the end next time!
Daggers Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Why is it that not rating Howard is seen as trying to wind people up on here??? Howard is useless in my opinion Grr. Stop winding me up.
hackneyfox Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 I won't be sorry to see him relegated to the bench. Okay as an impact sub but we could and should sign much better players.
lestajigs Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Has this gone through yet???????????? Excuse me I'm an inpatient bastard!!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.