Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
21st Century Fox

The Budweiser FA Cup

Recommended Posts

Posted

"C'est La Vie"

If it means more prize money then it can only benefit the smaller clubs.

But as with any sponsorship issues or Sky issues on here, many foxestalkers are still stuck in the dark ages and dont quite grasp the value of branding and sponsorship.

Its the way of the world, and the sooner people wake up to it the easier it will be.

How is this any different to E.ON?? That was hardly glamorous, or AXA??? Or even Carling with the Carling Cup or even in fact the CocaCola League that we have played in and now nPower, brands that mean we can buy one or two extra players a season?!?!

No biggy for me, its the Fa Cup, no Yank is following you around grabbing your bollocks until you recite the Budweiser Credo word for word are they!! Your not being forced to call it anything different it will just be refereed to in a different way!!

Posted

"C'est La Vie"

If it means more prize money then it can only benefit the smaller clubs.

But as with any sponsorship issues or Sky issues on here, many foxestalkers are still stuck in the dark ages and dont quite grasp the value of branding and sponsorship.

Its the way of the world, and the sooner people wake up to it the easier it will be.

How is this any different to E.ON?? That was hardly glamorous, or AXA??? Or even Carling with the Carling Cup or even in fact the CocaCola League that we have played in and now nPower, brands that mean we can buy one or two extra players a season?!?!

No biggy for me, its the Fa Cup, no Yank is following you around grabbing your bollocks until you recite the Budweiser Credo word for word are they!! Your not being forced to call it anything different it will just be refereed to in a different way!!

Sponsorship is a necessary evil now but it does reek of soul selling. This is such a bad choice, it just chips away at the identity of the competition. Its just the constant reminder of how business has its hooks in sport. Sport in its nature is pro-competition where as business (capitalism) is anti-competition, the two just jar so badly. Bit off topic but like I said its just another one of those constant reminders.

Posted

"C'est La Vie"

If it means more prize money then it can only benefit the smaller clubs.

But as with any sponsorship issues or Sky issues on here, many foxestalkers are still stuck in the dark ages and dont quite grasp the value of branding and sponsorship.

Its the way of the world, and the sooner people wake up to it the easier it will be.

How is this any different to E.ON?? That was hardly glamorous, or AXA??? Or even Carling with the Carling Cup or even in fact the CocaCola League that we have played in and now nPower, brands that mean we can buy one or two extra players a season?!?!

No biggy for me, its the Fa Cup, no Yank is following you around grabbing your bollocks until you recite the Budweiser Credo word for word are they!! Your not being forced to call it anything different it will just be refereed to in a different way!!

Yes. E.on is German and AXA is French. But now that the FA Cup is sponsored by a Belgian company and named after a product that is produced in Burton, the FA is all but shitting inside the Cup? Please.

And get a grip with this "American" stuff. Corporate sponsorship is so much more blatantly tacky in English football than it is in any of the "Big 4" North American sports leagues.

Posted

Yes. E.on is German and AXA is French. But now that the FA Cup is sponsored by a Belgian company and named after a product that is produced in Burton, the FA is all but shitting inside the Cup? Please.

And get a grip with this "American" stuff. Corporate sponsorship is so much more blatantly tacky in English football than it is in any of the "Big 4" North American sports leagues.

Absolutely, people still bang on about 'Americanisation' of british sports, I'm afraid it isnt so.

Posted

"C'est La Vie"

If it means more prize money then it can only benefit the smaller clubs.

But as with any sponsorship issues or Sky issues on here, many foxestalkers are still stuck in the dark ages and dont quite grasp the value of branding and sponsorship.

Its the way of the world, and the sooner people wake up to it the easier it will be.

How is this any different to E.ON?? That was hardly glamorous, or AXA??? Or even Carling with the Carling Cup or even in fact the CocaCola League that we have played in and now nPower, brands that mean we can buy one or two extra players a season?!?!

No biggy for me, its the Fa Cup, no Yank is following you around grabbing your bollocks until you recite the Budweiser Credo word for word are they!! Your not being forced to call it anything different it will just be refereed to in a different way!!

130200499736.jpg

Posted

But as with any sponsorship issues or Sky issues on here, many foxestalkers are still stuck in the dark ages and dont quite grasp the value of branding and sponsorship.

Its the way of the world, and the sooner people wake up to it the easier it will be.

And conversely I can see a far greater value in the ideas of football being a sport based on community, heritage and tradition.

I'm plenty awake with regards to knowing "the way of the world" when it comes to football, I just don't much care for it.

Posted

They could've at least chosen a nicer lager, Budweisers shit.

This is more important, Got stuck having to drink them at the World cup out of plastic bottles. Only plus was they were ok priced and you could buy as many as you wanted and take them to your seat. 3 of us ended up with 20 of them just before the Australia V Germany game.......4 nil lose the beers came in handy.

Posted

Perhaps people should be more worried about the fact that for the 2nd year running the final is going to be played on the same day as league games, because the FA lacked the foresight to bring the season forward a bit.

Posted

Double standards, child football shirts cant have an alcoholic brand on them as sponsorship, yet the two main cup competitions in the country can be sponsored by two beer brands the FA are just money grabbing twats

Posted

I know the value of branding and sponsorship, it just sounds crap.

will agree it sounds crap but imo i always call it the fa cup, i never said who we got in the e.on cup or littewoods cup etc always who we drawn in the fa cup. makes no diffrence to me.

Posted

What they gonna do next? Introduce multiball?

Exactly the same thing I thought when I saw this :giggle: Mul-TI ball!

I'm not going to slate Budweiser though, bought a crate/"slab" of Bud today, for $45 :ph34r: and got this bad boy for free..

265015_10150274899762442_532627441_8923708_7594152_n.jpg

I only bought the Bud because I wanted the ball lol In hindsight I kinda regret throwing away $45 like that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...