21st Century Fox Posted 3 October 2011 Posted 3 October 2011 Wasn't she doing cartwheels and handstands while she was waiting to be questioned by police? Also a few U.S. news channels have private jets ready to fly her out of Italy and get the scoop first, so she's as good as out of there no doubt.
Guest MattP Posted 3 October 2011 Posted 3 October 2011 Wasn't she doing cartwheels and handstands while she was waiting to be questioned by police? Also a few U.S. news channels have private jets ready to fly her out of Italy and get the scoop first, so she's as good as out of there no doubt. She's a bit of a nutter, we all can see that. Anyway, after all this shit she better do playboy.
jonno24 Posted 3 October 2011 Author Posted 3 October 2011 No I'm just putting a theory forward. Word gets round in small towns, we all know people in villages who have done things and got off with them as they cant "prove it" in court. Like I've said, i have watched and read loads about this and I still wouldnt of been able to deliver a guilty verdict myself, not being 100% But I am just totally convinced she was involved in some way or knew far more than she was letting on. The main piece of evidence (The Knife) had 0.1 pictograms of meridiths DNA on it which equals 0.000000001 of a gram of DNA The laboratory that was used wasnt even certified to carry out Normal DNA screening But hey we may both be wrong
Alexikokopops Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 Really?! So what was she grinning at? The article fails to address that. Do you not think in this crazy, crazy she could have been grinning while talking to Counsel while they were awaiting the hearing to proceed? Coupled with the fact she was chatting and grinning, it certainly doesn't suggest it was during proceedings. Further, I can't see any mention of her giggling through the trial With regard to the sex toy, please put this in context. It appears that she was talking about it as part of her defence. From an objective viewpoint, it appears that the article is an attempt at character assassination - which the Italian media have been keen to do. The article is over two years old.
Koke Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 Im still confused as to why she tried to pin the murder on that Patrick bloke.
z-layrex Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 The whole case was a mess, the Italians cannot do anything properly. As for her and Sollecito's innocence, i'm really not sure. But anyway, they can't prove her guilty because the Polizia di Stato made a big cock up of everything they did, and thus she is innocent.
marko Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 The article is over two years old. I'm fully aware of that, thanks. If you read back, the article was posted to try and illustrate that Knox was giggling through the first trial; a point put forward by Mattp. My response was simply to illustrate the article implied nothing of the sort.
Guest MattP Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 Daily Mail posts wrong story online... Quality.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 Daily Mail posts wrong story online... Ha! That's brilliant - shame it didn't make it to print proper. I just guess she should be glad she wasn't doing her time in Franklands Prison. Though having said that, if any woman ever "looked" like a murderer...
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 Maybe she could appear on some sort of show, like Opportunity Knox?
Trav Le Bleu Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 Maybe she could appear on some sort of show, like Opportunity Knox? Badum tish!
GLC Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 At least I can now say I want to shag her without feeling guilty. I mean come on! And she's a goer. Allegedly.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 At least I can now say I want to shag her without feeling guilty. I mean come on! And she's a goer. Allegedly. But have you seen her sex face?
topharry123 Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 By the facts that have come out it looks like justice was done. We'll never know if she really had a part in it or not but the courts made the right decision eventually. I'm about to start reading the 297 page court documents explaining the original decision......
Dr The Singh Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 But have you seen her sex face? Looks good to me!! It doesn't matter, I will be long finished before she will get anywhere near that face!!!
General Smuts Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 At least I can now say I want to shag her without feeling guilty. I mean come on! And she's a goer. Allegedly. I saw this thread had a fair few pages and was gonna just wade in and say more or less the same. I definately would.
Freeman's Wharfer Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 By the facts that have come out it looks like justice was done. We'll never know if she really had a part in it or not but the courts made the right decision eventually. I'm about to start reading the 297 page court documents explaining the original decision...... Where did you get that from mate? Might have a gander seeing as I've got quite interested in this case over the past few days.
EnderbyFox Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 Where did you get that from mate? Might have a gander seeing as I've got quite interested in this case over the past few days. http://www.beforeyoutakethatpill.com/2011/3/Massei_Report.pdf Somone posted it on here a few pages back mate
Alexikokopops Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 I'm fully aware of that, thanks. It's quite alright. My pleasure.
Freeman's Wharfer Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 http://www.beforeyoutakethatpill.com/2011/3/Massei_Report.pdf Somone posted it on here a few pages back mate Cheers mate, had a scroll through but must have missed that. This is quite interesting. There's a link to the audio too: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/04/10/48hours/main4936228.shtml
The Doctor Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 http://www.thedailym...y-201110044377/ AMANDA Knox will today begin an intensive training course in how not to look shifty, ever. As the American student won her appeal and flew home to Seattle, the media organisations she has not done a deal with pledged to catch her with either a knowing smile or a sinister sideways glance. Up to 3,000 photographers will use telephoto lenses to record Knox's every expression in the hope of capturing the crucial moment where she admits her guilt using at least one part of her face. And the UK's Daily Mail has appointed its emotionally fragile columnist Liz Jones to analyse the best new Amanda Knox photos on a daily basis and give them marks out of 10 for shiftiness. Media analyst Julian Cook said: "Hopefully we are just a few years away from shifty photographs replacing all this half-arsed dicking about with DNA." But the Knox family said they will use the money from the book, film, TV interviews, iPhone app and saucy action figure to train the 24 year-old in how to look perpetually innocent. A family spokesman said: "It's going to be difficult. At times even Mother Theresa could look as if she'd just stolen a pie. We'll get there, though there may be days when she has to walk around wearing a motorbike helmet." But Knox could still be dragged back to Italy after prosecutors pledged to launch an appeal against the acquittal based on one of the photographs where she looks like an evil, sexy witch. A source said: "It's a lot stronger than our first case, so we are reasonably confident." Meanwhile, the media organisations Knox has done a deal with have confirmed they are very close to convincing her to straddle a chair. :laugh:
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 4 October 2011 Posted 4 October 2011 A dire travesty of justice methinks. Bitch!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.