Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
SaM 12

Mills on loan to leeds / whu or who?

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've also had it from a media source that he nutted Pearson.

If that is true, then surely he would want to get out of there ASAP, so why turn down the load deal?

I really don't think he nutted him, I know NP is hard, but Mills is a big bloke, and if he did nut him, then I would expect some signs of it, but NP's face is unblemished. Unless it was one of those things footballers do where they sitck their head in right up close and have a little shudder.

something like this:

Posted

this mills situation has been an embarrassment from the start. if we can get 3 mill for him in the summer i will be pleased.

Depends if anyone is daft enough to le Sven lose with a chequebook again...

Posted

I've also had it from a media source that he nutted Pearson.

I heard at the forest game that he had wellens round the throat in the dressing room after the barnsley game

Posted

If that is true, then surely he would want to get out of there ASAP, so why turn down the load deal?

Because he was going to lose out financially.

I assume that has been sorted now, so he is on his toes.

Posted

If that is true, then surely he would want to get out of there ASAP, so why turn down the load deal?

I really don't think he nutted him, I know NP is hard, but Mills is a big bloke, and if he did nut him, then I would expect some signs of it, but NP's face is unblemished. Unless it was one of those things footballers do where they sitck their head in right up close and have a little shudder.

something like this:

Pearson didn't take part in the press conference that they have 2 days before the game (derby) on Tuesday.

Posted

Pearson didn't take part in the press conference that they have 2 days before the game (derby) on Tuesday.

Good point I wandered why Shakespeare took it, it certainly seems plausible that this could have happened but I guess we will never know the full truth.

Posted

Because he was going to lose out financially.

I assume that has been sorted now, so he is on his toes.

But if he had nutted NP, then there would be grounds for dismissal and he would lose out on more, I guess, unless he is hoping to get sacked and paid off and then he can negotiate a nice signing on fee. I don't really know, but if I had had a blazing row with my boss, and I was offered the chance to work in another department away from him, then I would take it.

I am not sure how he would lose out financially we would still have to honour his contract and pay him what we have agreed to. He has more faith in the team than I do if he thinks he is getting a promotion bonus and he isn't going to be making any more appearances or scoring any more goals for us so those bonuses are gone too.

The only reason I can think of for him turning down the move to Leeds is personal reasons he has got his bird and a house in Leicester, but it is not exactly that far and others in the team commute from further away. Or he actually realises he has fvcked up and wants to make amends and win his place back.

Posted

But if he had nutted NP, then there would be grounds for dismissal and he would lose out on more, I guess, unless he is hoping to get sacked and paid off and then he can a nice signing on fee. I don't really know, but if I had had a blazing row with my boss, and I was offered the chance to work in another department away from him, then I would take it.

I am not sure how he would lose out financially we would still have to honour his contract and pay him what we have agreed to. He has more faith in the team than I do if he thinks he is getting a promotion bonus and he isn't going to be making any more appearances or scoring any more goals for us so those bonuses are gone too.

The only reason I can think of for him turning down the move to Leeds is personal reasons he has got his bird and a house in Leicester, but it is not exactly that far and others in the team commute from further away. Or he actually realises he has fvcked up and wants to make amends and win his place back.

You don't get paid off if you're sacked, but we would lose out on any money from being able to sell him. I think its all about recouperating some of the money we paid for him

Posted

But if he had nutted NP, then there would be grounds for dismissal and he would lose out on more, I guess, unless he is hoping to get sacked and paid off and then he can negotiate a nice signing on fee. I don't really know, but if I had had a blazing row with my boss, and I was offered the chance to work in another department away from him, then I would take it.

I am not sure how he would lose out financially we would still have to honour his contract and pay him what we have agreed to. He has more faith in the team than I do if he thinks he is getting a promotion bonus and he isn't going to be making any more appearances or scoring any more goals for us so those bonuses are gone too.

The only reason I can think of for him turning down the move to Leeds is personal reasons he has got his bird and a house in Leicester, but it is not exactly that far and others in the team commute from further away. Or he actually realises he has fvcked up and wants to make amends and win his place back.

The Owners won't want to dismiss him because he will be a free agent best thing for the club is to tempt another club to buy him, at least that way the Club might claw back a possible couple of million for him

Posted

You don't get paid off if you're sacked, but we would lose out on any money from being able to sell him. I think its all about recouperating some of the money we paid for him

Sven does, unless they can prove that Mills was in breach of his contract to such an extent that he warranted sacking, and if he nutted Pearson then he would be, we would have to pay off his contract. Remember Dennis Wise, he took us to court because we sacked him for breaking someone's jaw, he came close to winning, you have to be very careful when sacking someone that you don't end up with a hefty pay out.

The Owners won't want to dismiss him because he will be a free agent best thing for the club is to tempt another club to buy him, at least that way the Club might claw back a possible couple of million for him

Any deal with another club requires Mills to agree to it, if Mills wants to be a cvnt he can just see out his contract, picking up his wages and not playing, he wouldn't be the first player to do it.

I am not saying that is what he is doing, he may want to fight for his place, but if I was him I would have gone to Leeds and put it all behind him, see what happens at the end of the season.

Posted

Just had it confirmed that MM didn't butt NP. Told you it was all a rumour.

Posted

I've had enough. Loaning our captain to our rivals. Does that ****ing clown Pearson ever learn when he loaned out Campbell to Blackpool!

Not going to go to any away games now this season unless that twat leaves.

To be fair Mills has not been great and he wasn't one of Nigel's signings. Who cares how much he cost, if he's not good enough then we may as well get rid of him. Leeds are not really rivals this season as it's unlikely that we'll make the play offs now, so why not give him some game time and a chance to impress again? I'd rather he be loaned out, play and at least save a bit of the wage bill rather than have him sat out in the cold paying his full wages. If we were higher up in the table and close to the play offs with Leeds being a team in a similar position, then yes it would be stupid. But Pearson needs to make his own choices as to who he plays and who he doesn't regardless of the amount they cost. Last time he did a great job for the club and he needs to build his own team rather than settle for Sven's players.

Posted

A rumour you started on here.

Your point being?

I clearly indicated that it was a rumour and that I was just passing it on. Never claimed it was top info. Don't see what the problem is, or yours for that matter.

Some cocks on here.

Posted

Your point being?

I clearly indicated that it was a rumour and that I was just passing it on. Never claimed it was top info. Don't see what the problem is, or yours for that matter.

Some cocks on here.

lol

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...