Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
SaM 12

Mills on loan to leeds / whu or who?

Recommended Posts

Posted

Your point being?

I clearly indicated that it was a rumour and that I was just passing it on. Never claimed it was top info. Don't see what the problem is, or yours for that matter.

Some cocks on here.

:thumbup:

Posted

There's a rumour going round that Pearson stuck the nut on Mills. Let me re-iterate its only a rumour and I'd be very surprised if it was true.

The club hate stuff like this getting out. Which is why it's always "hearsay".

Like I said, was only a rumour! Done some digging and it seems it was the other way round. Of course this is all gossip and could be bullshit, take it however you will.

Just passing it on.

You'd think so but the club like to keep things internal - imagine if it got out into the papers!

Pearson didn't take part in the press conference that they have 2 days before the game (derby) on Tuesday.

Just had it confirmed that MM didn't butt NP. Told you it was all a rumour.

o.png

Posted

Your point being?

I clearly indicated that it was a rumour and that I was just passing it on. Never claimed it was top info. Don't see what the problem is, or yours for that matter.

Some cocks on here.

I do think it's worth stating that despite the fact that you prefixed the original comments by stating it was rumour, these are quite serious allegations to be stating and as such you should probably have considered the credibility of your source before spouting them over the internet.

This is not some fanciful transfer gossip. This is talking about serious allegations.

Edit: Grammar

Posted

Your point being?

I clearly indicated that it was a rumour and that I was just passing it on. Never claimed it was top info. Don't see what the problem is, or yours for that matter.

Some cocks on here.

The point being there are a lot of people on here who still believe you actually get information (strange considering your record over the last year). Whether you put "it's a rumour" or not, it gets repeated elsewhere that you have said it happened.

Now you can't help that, but perhaps knowing many people wait with baited breath to listen to what you have to say, I would have hoped you would post with a bit more caution. Especially as you seem to have managed to check with your "source" and confirm it as nonsense quite quickly.

Someone with one post would just get pretty much ignored, someone with a rep such as yourself doesn't i'm afraid.

Posted

I do think it's worth stating that despite the fact that you prefixed the original comments by stating it was rumour, these are quite serious allegations to be stating and as such you should probably have considered the credibility of your source before spouting them over the internet.

This is not some fanciful transfer gossip. This is talking about serious allegations.

Edit: Grammar

people don't check sources nowadays (remember these aren't proper journalists). they want to be first to the punch so they receive all the plaudits if it turns out to be true and they know if it doesn't turn out to be true people will have forgotten by the time the next rumour is started. it's the microwave era.

Posted

people don't check sources nowadays (remember these aren't proper journalists). they want to be first to the punch so they receive all the plaudits if it turns out to be true and they know if it doesn't turn out to be true people will have forgotten by the time the next rumour is started. it's the microwave era.

Agreed.

I just think that being first to the punch on the next loan deal is significantly different to being the first to the punch on an allegation of serious misconduct which is harmful to peoples reputation.

Posted

The point being there are a lot of people on here who still believe you actually get information (strange considering your record over the last year). Whether you put "it's a rumour" or not, it gets repeated elsewhere that you have said it happened.

Now you can't help that, but perhaps knowing many people wait with baited breath to listen to what you have to say, I would have hoped you would post with a bit more caution. Especially as you seem to have managed to check with your "source" and confirm it as nonsense quite quickly.

Someone with one post would just get pretty much ignored, someone with a rep such as yourself doesn't i'm afraid.

Even though you can't wait to put a dig in? And just so you know, my info keeps on coming, so cheers.

I can't manage to be in constant contact with people. Maybe I should've said this wasn't from my "source".

Hardly my fault people wait with "baited breath" is it.

Posted

lol

Who are you, really?

lol

I might be a nobody compared to you Bert but at least I show the other supporters on here a bit of respect and not call them cocks

Posted

I might be a nobody compared to you Bert but at least I show the other supporters on here a bit of respect and not call them cocks

Oh well boo hoo :cry:

Posted

Even though you can't wait to put a dig in? And just so you know, my info keeps on coming, so cheers.

Oh I still think you get the odd little bit, but nothing like you did. But I also believe you massively overplay the "insider" part. Repeating much information already available on twitter, sky, the Mercury etc without crediting them as sources. Taking flyers on things you think inevitable only to end up with a bit of egg on your face.

Unfortunately you have got so much wrong (especially regarding transfers) your reputation has been tarnished. If people want to be blinkered to that then that's up to them, and you can hide behind the "I post what im told", "transfers don't always come off", "You've upset me so i'm not posting on here any more" stuff for so long, but eventually people will stop believing... and posting rumours on here isn't going to help with that.

That's just my personal opinion, nothing to do with being a mod and nothing to do with the thoughts of other people on this site.

If you don't like my opinion, hey that's life... but i've given it without calling you a cock. I can over look that though as we're all capable of being bellends sometimes, I can be and I know it.

I can't manage to be in constant contact with people. Maybe I should've said this wasn't from my "source".

Or maybe you shouldn't have posted it at all without confirmation considering it was something so serious.

Hardly my fault people wait with "baited breath" is it.

Read my post, I clearly said that. That doesn't mean you shouldn't exercise caution and consider the consequences of what you post.

Posted

you'd of thought that about Dennis Wise, we did sack him and got sued over it

The reason we got sued was because under british law you can not be punished twice for the same offence and we had already fined him 2 weeks wages for that offence and so the judge determined WE had broken the law in sacking him AFTER fining him. If we had just sacked him we would of been fine.

Posted

The reason we got sued was because under british law you can not be punished twice for the same offence and we had already fined him 2 weeks wages for that offence and so the judge determined WE had broken the law in sacking him AFTER fining him. If we had just sacked him we would of been fine.

We didn't contest the unfair dismissal hearing because the the old board that sacked him had already gone bust and therefore it was a new company and not liable.

Posted

But did Jack Hobbs definitely smack Sousa after Norwich last year?

:o would love that one to be true lol

As for the Bert bashing, it was clear that it was just a rumour and Bert is allowed to post rumours as much as everyone else, he shouldn't be punished because he sometimes posts stuff from a reliable source, jeez, imagine if people only posted facts this forum would be dead, anyway he has had others corroborate his rumour, so it is a rumour, he posted it, he then found out maybe from the reliable source that it isn't true, so he posted the retraction.

Anyway whether it is true or not it certainly made for a few amusing posts.

Posted

If you don't like my opinion, hey that's life... but i've given it without calling you a cock. I can over look that though as we're all capable of being bellends sometimes, I can be and I know it.

lol You just did! Addmitedly, more subtly.

Posted

Oh I still think you get the odd little bit, but nothing like you did. But I also believe you massively overplay the "insider" part. Repeating much information already available on twitter, sky, the Mercury etc without crediting them as sources. Taking flyers on things you think inevitable only to end up with a bit of egg on your face.

Unfortunately you have got so much wrong (especially regarding transfers) your reputation has been tarnished. If people want to be blinkered to that then that's up to them, and you can hide behind the "I post what im told", "transfers don't always come off", "You've upset me so i'm not posting on here any more" stuff for so long, but eventually people will stop believing... and posting rumours on here isn't going to help with that.

That's just my personal opinion, nothing to do with being a mod and nothing to do with the thoughts of other people on this site.

If you don't like my opinion, hey that's life... but i've given it without calling you a cock. I can over look that though as we're all capable of being bellends sometimes, I can be and I know it.

:appl:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...