Bayfox Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 Doesn't work to well on he galaxy s3 so not to happy about the change so far.
Stig the Lawnmower Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 just been on the site, had no probs at all. mind you, it was on a laptop not an i-pad, i-phone, S 3 etc. I like the site, it's not so 'in your face' as the old one, looks more traditional. I'me sure I'd find some probs if I trawled through it a bit. give it time, it will be fine. Thinking about it, I very rarely use the official site, prefer Foxestalk. We just need a fixtures/result page.
Stig the Lawnmower Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 just been on the site, had no probs at all. mind you, it was on a laptop not an i-pad, i-phone, S 3 etc. I like the site, it's not so 'in your face' as the old one, looks more traditional. I'me sure I'd find some probs if I trawled through it a bit. give it time, it will be fine. Thinking about it, I very rarely use the official site, prefer Foxestalk. We just need a fixtures/result page. what a dickhead!! just looked at the calender page. Doh! don't need the official site now
fleckneymike Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 The quality of writing hasn't improved. Main news article begins with "Anthony Knockaert will both miss Tuesday’s Capital One Cup trip to Torquay United, having reported for international duty over the weekend." 2nd article contains "already an MBE and Freeman of City" 3rd article contains "but it was the overall quality of City’s pay"
Mark_w Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 They quality of writing hasn't improved. Main news article begins with "Anthony Knockaert will both miss Tuesday’s Capital One Cup trip to Torquay United, having reported for international duty over the weekend." 2nd article contains "already an MBE and Freeman of City" 3rd article contains "but it was the overall quality of City’s pay" Was that deliberate?
fleckneymike Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 Was that deliberate? I'm hoping with my own piss poor proof reading skills they'll sign me up. I've edited myself now
nothin2seehere Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 I'm hoping with my own piss poor proof reading skills they'll sign me up. I've edited myself now It's still wrong Edit; FFS. I was reading the quote http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry's_law
Jace Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 The Chesterfield website is the same as ours too. It's incredible that someone somewhere is actually so crazy they think they have improved the site, someone really should be fired and unemployed for life for this blunder
fleckneymike Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 It's still wrong Edit; FFS. I was reading the quote http://en.wikipedia....ki/Muphry's_law In all seriousness how can they make mistakes in the three headline articles?
RizLCFC Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 Sign this petition please and lets try and get this looked at properly: https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/official-leicester-city-website?utm_campaign=petition_page&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=share_petition
goose2010 Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 Morgan weighing in at 15st 10lbs...UNIT!!! Come on the website isn't too bad is it that bad that we need a petition setting up? its only a website! You can tell that it isn't finished and is a work in progress people would be moaning al ot more if the website was down whilst they finished it!
Sol thewall Bamba Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 Does anyone know if this is a new template offered to League teams or if we've designed our own?
Fox92 Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 Does anyone know if this is a new template offered to League teams or if we've designed our own? I'd say this is the template. I've been on other clubs' websites and they are similar.
lcfcsnow Posted 13 August 2012 Posted 13 August 2012 Thinking about it, I very rarely use the official site, prefer Foxestalk. We just need a fixtures/result page. There are fixtures/results from every season on here under season archive
davieG Posted 15 August 2012 Posted 15 August 2012 http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/story-16711951-detail/story.html?
Salieri Posted 15 August 2012 Posted 15 August 2012 34 signatures?! Agree though that it is bloody awful.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 15 August 2012 Posted 15 August 2012 http://www.thisislei...ail/story.html? “There are loads of adverts but the layout looks very amateurish. Certain links take a while, and in this day and age you expect everything instantly.†This kind of person does my head in. They will forever live in disappointment. No problems with pop-ups (never had one) or it being slow - if anything I think it's quicker than the old one. My problem is that it doesn't look Leicester City because of the colours used.
Big Dave Posted 15 August 2012 Posted 15 August 2012 This kind of person does my head in. They will forever live in disappointment. No problems with pop-ups (never had one) or it being slow - if anything I think it's quicker than the old one. My problem is that it doesn't look Leicester City because of the colours used. I have sorted the pop-ups out, but I do find the web-site very slow. I have a quick internet connection, but find the new site frustratingly slow. In comparison, I found the old site much much faster to load. Not too bothered about the new layout - it always takes a little time to get used to where things are, it is just the speed of it that I have problems with.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 15 August 2012 Posted 15 August 2012 It dosnt display properly at all in firefox really? I use Firefox and looks fine.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.