bob gregory Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 We looked as good if not better until badger head fvcked it.. If it ain't broke and all that shite, All he did was invite pressure on our back 4. Nigal lost it for us simple
Munshi Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 Exactly what I thought, Drinkwater offered absolutely nothing
Jimmy Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 should of took Dyer off but it should of been Konch that came on with Schlupp moved forward
Guest Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 Their change to their midfield meant we needed to do something. Personally would have left Lloyd on like you, we could have taken them for pace but wasn't to be. NPs tactics in the first game won it for us so not sure why people so quickly dismiss the amazing job he's done with us again.
bob gregory Posted 12 May 2013 Author Posted 12 May 2013 We never looked good all game.Good enough though, surely
Aus Fox Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 We had to, to counter their move of bringing on forestierri or we would have even torn apart
bob gregory Posted 12 May 2013 Author Posted 12 May 2013 We had to, to counter their move of bringing on forestierri or we would have even torn apartOh that worked then, nigal ???
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 Subs are getting worse from NP. Kane is garbage. Even more so when on the wing. Didn't want NP to go but if he did i won't be bothered. Decision making is awful. Why not bring Marshall on? Killed the game completely but things like this will now be forgotten about
sdb Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 Bloody hell. We missed a last min pen. Stop blaming the manager. It seemed a strange decision but it should've worked out in hindsight. If he's done anything wrong it's relying on Keane who switches off too often. But he seems exempt from blame.
Mark_w Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 Nigal lost it for us simple We were a 96th minute penalty away from going to Wembley.
Aus Fox Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 Oh that worked then, nigal ???[/quote It did! We closed up and was a penalty away from wembley
bob gregory Posted 12 May 2013 Author Posted 12 May 2013 We were a 96th minute penalty away from going to Wembley.We wouldn't have needed that pen if the meddling fool hadn't changed it ...SIMPLE
maynefox Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 Dyer was having a shiv game. In the first half he left Schlupp exposed on Anya a lot of time and that was were the main threat was! He was a passenger and had little effected going forward, disappointed as in another thread I said to play him and Schlupp. He weren't up for it. I would have brought on Marshall, still keeping the width!Kane was the poor substitution
Fox92 Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 Dyer offered/offers nothing. He is good once every 5. One of the first to leave for me.
bob gregory Posted 12 May 2013 Author Posted 12 May 2013 I dont think dyer set the world alight by any means but we were getting it wide and taking the pressure off.. To play so narrow and loose so much of the second ball in the middle is criminal
morris1234 Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 You can win a game 5-0 and still look back and pick at things. Your upset I get that but calm the f4ck down! Lets get it out our system then move forward supporting any who represent this club! Worked their backsides off today!
Merging Cultures Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 I disagree with everyone saying of we didn't we'd have been torn a new one. We were anyway. Why not play our game? Why try to counter theirs? Make then counter us. Biggest problem was wastefulness when we had the ball. Kasper is great but how many times did he just give them the ball. Dyer offered/offers nothing. He is good once every 5. One of the first to leave for me. Crazy.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 So what's new? Pearson never has known his arse from his elbow.
Ely fox Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 Drinkwater does nothing for the team and just gives the ball away, Dyer carries a threat with his pace. Very strange decision.
bob gregory Posted 12 May 2013 Author Posted 12 May 2013 Perfect reply 10/10 I disagree with everyone saying of we didn't we'd have been torn a new one. We were anyway. Why not play our game? Why try to counter theirs? Make then counter us. Biggest problem was wastefulness when we had the ball. Kasper is great but how many times did he just give them the ball. Crazy.
muzzyisalegend Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 All I can say is I'm shocked that spurs rate Kane so highly, I thinks he's awful, and so ineffective. He gave them the ball back every time he got it.
kingfox Posted 12 May 2013 Posted 12 May 2013 We needed fresh legs, but our back up isn't good enough, so we had to rely on Kane and Drinkwater. I don't like Drinkwater and never will, negative midfielder who didn't help at all today. We need to turn our shit back up, into good back up by adding more quality.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.