Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
I am Rod Hull

The Royal Baby

Recommended Posts

Posted

George Alagiah looked especially smug delivering that news.

Bit predictable tbh I was hoping they'd go left-field with something like Keenan or Jayden.

Posted

Boris is, behind the bluster, a very competent and intelligent man.  And also a proper Tory, whereas Ken is just a twat.

 

 

I find that very hard to believe .

He should get an oscar for his performance if Tom Hanks got one for Forrest Gump

Guest MattP
Posted

Prince George of Cambridge. Lovely.

Posted

This is the same Boris who when told by some President that he was proud of the number of women attended university in his country qupped, 'They only do it so the can nab a bloke.'

 

Upper class twit who could not give two hoots for the likes of you and I.

Posted

Theres been more in house murders in the history of the British Monarchy than the borgias. Theres also been more incest, rape, molest and thievery than in all the Poopes. So why should I look up to them?

Guest MattP
Posted

Theres been more in house murders in the history of the British Monarchy than the borgias. Theres also been more incest, rape, molest and thievery than in all the Poopes. So why should I look up to them?

 

lol lol lol

Posted

So we're due Charles III, William V and George VII, in theory....

I hope to be around for the first two, with a bit of luck. Little chance of seeing King George, given the Windsor genes and priority health care

 

Mixed bag, the Georges, weren't they:

- George I & II were basically Germans

- George III lost America and went mad

- George IV was an unpopular, debauched slob

- George V was a solid, deceptively cunning (or well-advised) moderniser

- George VI seems to have been a decent cove (certainly better than his obnoxious brother, arguably our worst ever monarch)

 

Extraordinary to think that George V, King as recently as 1936 was a first cousin of the German Kaiser and the Russian Czar!

 

Did you know that George II was due to be followed by King Fred, but Fred predeceased his Dad...

Posted

Never knew the last bit. There certainly has been a lot of foreign blood in the British Royal which makes it surprising that the far right support them so strongly (OK visa versa for the far left)

 

:)

Posted

So we're due Charles III, William V and George VII, in theory....

I hope to be around for the first two, with a bit of luck. Little chance of seeing King George, given the Windsor genes and priority health care

 

Mixed bag, the Georges, weren't they:

- George I & II were basically Germans

- George III lost America and went mad

- George IV was an unpopular, debauched slob

- George V was a solid, deceptively cunning (or well-advised) moderniser

- George VI seems to have been a decent cove (certainly better than his obnoxious brother, arguably our worst ever monarch)

 

Extraordinary to think that George V, King as recently as 1936 was a first cousin of the German Kaiser and the Russian Czar!

 

Did you know that George II was due to be followed by King Fred, but Fred predeceased his Dad...

Just looking at some of these on Wikipedia. Didn't know George VI was actually Albert. He became King George because Victoria didn't want anyone else to reign as an Albert and eclipse her Albert. Obviously he was never meant to be King so his name shouldn't have mattered.

Guest MattP
Posted

Never knew the last bit. There certainly has been a lot of foreign blood in the British Royal which makes it surprising that the far right support them so strongly.

:)

 

Weird, can't understand why the far-right would have supported any German. Or Austrian for that matter.

Posted

So we're due Charles III, William V and George VII, in theory....

I hope to be around for the first two, with a bit of luck. Little chance of seeing King George, given the Windsor genes and priority health care

 

Mixed bag, the Georges, weren't they:

- George I & II were basically Germans

- George III lost America and went mad

- George IV was an unpopular, debauched slob

- George V was a solid, deceptively cunning (or well-advised) moderniser

- George VI seems to have been a decent cove (certainly better than his obnoxious brother, arguably our worst ever monarch)

 

Extraordinary to think that George V, King as recently as 1936 was a first cousin of the German Kaiser and the Russian Czar!

 

Did you know that George II was due to be followed by King Fred, but Fred predeceased his Dad...

Yes, the two world wars were nothing more than family feuds that got a bit out of hand .

Posted

Yes, the two world wars were nothing more than family feuds that got a bit out of hand .

 

This has been mentioned in a previous post, but following the laws of causality two world wars began (that resulted in the death of almost 100 million people, not to mention how many the Spanish Flu killed) by a driver taking a wrong turn.

Posted

This has been mentioned in a previous post, but following the laws of causality two world wars began (that resulted in the death of almost 100 million people, not to mention how many the Spanish Flu killed) by a driver taking a wrong turn.

 

I think they were all looking for an excuse to start a war anyway.

Posted

I think they were all looking for an excuse to start a war anyway.

 

Yeah, that was just the casus belli, but it's unreal how that one turn had so many knock-on effects.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...