TimG Posted 7 April 2015 Posted 7 April 2015 Edit: Kramaric dribbling is brilliant so is his agility, he hasn't played enough games for us yet to be edited - EA Rules. All current stats are from his former club. And that's fine, like I said, I don't want Kramaric to have his dribbling downgraded. I just think that Mahrez is just as good if not better at dribbling than he is and so should also have a dribbling stat of around 79 or maybe even slightly higher.
Ashley Posted 7 April 2015 Posted 7 April 2015 I'm da daddy around here k. In all seriousness. It's higher than that site.
TimG Posted 7 April 2015 Posted 7 April 2015 I'm da daddy around here k. In all seriousness. It's higher than that site. Can you not just give me the specific numbers? There's no reason why it should be confidential information. You asked for people's opinions on player potentials and many people requested upgrades for Mahrez and Schlupp. Then nothing seemed to change for 2 months and when I asked about it you claimed that the potentials had changed. Then when someone else called you on it and gave a link to sofifa, where it shows that Mahrez still has 74 potential and Schlupp still has 73, you claimed the site wasn't accurate but you continue to refuse to tell us what the potentials have been changed to. I'm starting to think that maybe the potentials haven't changed at all and you're bullshitting me. But hey what do I know, you're the daddy around here..
Aleksz Posted 7 April 2015 Posted 7 April 2015 Not saying Ash is lying but So Fifa isn't wrong. Seems a lot of effort to update their site weekly with the tiniest of stat updates to just bull shit. But hey-ho, Ash is the editor and all. Glad Mahrez got 4 star skill, well deserved.
Ashley Posted 7 April 2015 Posted 7 April 2015 Can you not just give me the specific numbers? There's no reason why it should be confidential information. You asked for people's opinions on player potentials and many people requested upgrades for Mahrez and Schlupp. Then nothing seemed to change for 2 months and when I asked about it you claimed that the potentials had changed. Then when someone else called you on it and gave a link to sofifa, where it shows that Mahrez still has 74 potential and Schlupp still has 73, you claimed the site wasn't accurate but you continue to refuse to tell us what the potentials have been changed to. I'm starting to think that maybe the potentials haven't changed at all and you're bullshitting me. But hey what do I know, you're the daddy around here.. There's so much I can say due to a NDA with EA. It has been changed and it is higher. Something tells me you're sniffing for that So Fifa site though don't know why.
TimG Posted 7 April 2015 Posted 7 April 2015 There's so much I can say due to a NDA with EA. It has been changed and it is higher. Something tells me you're sniffing for that So Fifa site though don't know why. If you're telling the truth then I apologise. It's just, like Aleksz, I find it hard to believe that sofifa could be wrong considering they go through the trouble of updating stats and potentials after every Friday update. I promise you, I don't work for Sofifa hahaha
Ashley Posted 7 April 2015 Posted 7 April 2015 If you're telling the truth then I apologise. It's just, like Aleksz, I find it hard to believe that sofifa could be wrong considering they go through the trouble of updating stats and potentials after every Friday update. I promise you, I don't work for Sofifa hahaha It has been changed don't worry. Any other changes people want I will listen to
Danno Posted 7 April 2015 Posted 7 April 2015 Has mahrez got 4 star skills at the moment or is that next update
Ashley Posted 8 April 2015 Posted 8 April 2015 Has mahrez got 4 star skills at the moment or is that next update He has now. Doesn't deserve it though for me
Stadt Posted 8 April 2015 Posted 8 April 2015 The game would be a bit more boring if players only had what they should for skills
ARTY_FOX Posted 8 April 2015 Posted 8 April 2015 Well just scanning through dortmunds squad, to my surprise I see our very on Conrad Logan 87 overall
LAprice_ Posted 8 April 2015 Posted 8 April 2015 Ash, would you agree that the jumping stats are a bit inconsistent? The lowest 4 in the squad after the most recent download are Albrighton (40), Barmby (44), Vardy (51) and Huth (51). Considering that Knockaert, Nugent, Upson, Panayiotou and Logan all have 70 or over, do you not think some of those above are possibly a bit harsh? Specifically Vardy. I know it's only a little thing but I just assumed that cross-referencing within players from the same club would be ideal.
Ashley Posted 8 April 2015 Posted 8 April 2015 Huth 51?! To high or low? Huth doesn't really get that high off the ground to be honest. Would say they are more or less bang on. Vardy probably a little higher for post above.
Devonfox1884 Posted 8 April 2015 Posted 8 April 2015 I think Huth should be more like 60, agreed he doesn't jump as high as a defender should, but 51 makes him seem abysmal, and he's not. Vards should be about 60 as well imo.
Buzzell Posted 8 April 2015 Posted 8 April 2015 To high or low? Huth doesn't really get that high off the ground to be honest. Would say they are more or less bang on. Vardy probably a little higher for post above. Too low. He's not the highest jumper in world football but bloody hell Ash he's more than that. Vardy deffo needs raising. The amount of times he has beaten defenders to the ball in the air is remarkable for a lad his size.
Danizen Posted 9 April 2015 Posted 9 April 2015 To high or low? Huth doesn't really get that high off the ground to be honest. Would say they are more or less bang on. Vardy probably a little higher for post above. It should be a lot higher. He does jump and he is quite strong in the air. He isn't as dominant as other CBs but he is still a CB so his jumping should be at least average, Otherwise, you'll get the ridiculous situation where he's being out-jumped by Defoe, Silva, Walcott etc. which would seldom happen in real life. For a sizeable CB rated in the 70s, jumping should be at least 65.
stu Posted 10 April 2015 Posted 10 April 2015 Laggy as hell game, but f**k it, I'll probably never score another one of these!
DB11 Posted 10 April 2015 Posted 10 April 2015 Laggy as hell game, but f**k it, I'll probably never score another one of these! I'd be so pissed off if that was against me. Literally nothing you could do about it. That gets me onto the point of goalkeepers, I think they have been terrible this version. Well they are probably no different to other versions except that the animations make them look so flappy and letting stupid shots in. If they made it look a bit more sensational you could accept it but when, for example, the goalkeeper lets it hit him and go in, or tries to do a reaction save instead of catching it you get pretty pissed
stu Posted 10 April 2015 Posted 10 April 2015 I'd be so pissed off if that was against me. Literally nothing you could do about it. That gets me onto the point of goalkeepers, I think they have been terrible this version. Well they are probably no different to other versions except that the animations make them look so flappy and letting stupid shots in. If they made it look a bit more sensational you could accept it but when, for example, the goalkeeper lets it hit him and go in, or tries to do a reaction save instead of catching it you get pretty pissed Totally agree with everything you've said, but in my defence the guy had just scored an equaliser with a lob down the field in which my 5 man defense parted like the red sea and allowed his striker to score with a header. Another pet hate of mine on FIFA. So in conclusion your honour, fcuk him...
DB11 Posted 10 April 2015 Posted 10 April 2015 Can you not save fut replays on ps4? Share button on PS4 should work whatever the game mode is?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.