Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Stuliasz

Match Ratings : Leicester 0-1 Stoke - Vote Now

Recommended Posts

Posted

Very very poor show today, weakest midfield we have put out this season ( i know we had injuries) both full backs were rubbish, Morgan non existent and a toothless pair up front. This was a team and game that shows we are not good enough to stay up....

Posted

Hamer - Decent  apart from distribution

Simpson 6 - Didn't actually do a lot wrong

Wasil 5 - Not bad but the yellow meant he couldn't challenge for the whole game

Morgan 5 - Standard

Konchesky 3 - Too many bad moments

Drinkwater 2 - Pretty damn rubbish

King 2 - Pretty damn rubbish

Knockaert 6 - Pretty good

Schlupp 6 - Good take-ons and pace

Nugent 3 - Not very good

Vardy 2 - Very bad

 

Ulloa 4 - Better than Nugent and Vardy

Kramaric 5 - No service but some good touches 

Lawrence 2 - Good young player but needs to go out on loan again

 

Stoke 5 - We made some of their players look a lot better than they actually are

 

Ref 7 - Not bad

 

Faith in Nigel 10 - In Nigel we trust

Posted

Hamer 5 - One World Class save, but his kicking was terrible

 

Simpson 3 - Moses tore him apart all game, looked weak & his positional sense was poor

Morgan 6 - Should of done better when covering Konch for the goal, but tbh he was hardly tested

Wasilewski 6 - Should of closed Bojan down for the ball, but hardly any threats came his way, bit rash at times though

Konchesky 3 - Fed up with him, new LB is a must

 

Knockaert 6 - Decent shift, helped out defensively at times, lacked pace though

Drinkwater 5 - First half I thought he passed well, second half overran & was lightweight

King 3 - Constantly weak, looked like a schoolboy at times

Schlupp 6 - Constant threat first half, hardly saw the ball in the second

 

Nugent 3 - Ran around like a headless chicken, some of his touches were woeful

Vardy 4 - Worked his socks off again, but doesn't look like scoring

Posted

Only one player to come out of that game with any credit, big was.

Did king play, or any of our midfield, they walk through us time and again.

Nugent is a waste of a shirt, vardy not far behind, the other 3 defenders average.

Pearson got his team and tactics wrong again, just when we seem to be getting somewhere.

Stoke are bang average but we create nothing of note, and sat off them all game, we got what our performance and tactics deserved, nothing.

Posted

Hamer 5 - great save from N'Zonzi. Kicking beyond atrocious.

Simpson 6 - defensively solid. But dear God man hurry the fvck up with throw ins when we're losing 1-0.

Wasyl 6 - Loses a point for the worst pass I've ever seen. Otherwise ok.

Morgan 6 - ok. Zero threat at set pieces, why is he the one starting on the edge of the box attacking the ball whilst Wasyl is standing in front of the goalie? Bonkers.

Konchesky 5 - here you go Arnautovic, please just run in to this space we've got here. Not his worst game in possession.

Knockaert 7- Looked like the only one who gave two shits today. Some neat passes but missed our best chance.

King 2 - Big fan but the invisible man today. Totally shirked responsibility in possession too - I appreciate the balance his keeping the ball brings but sometimes he's got to get his head up and pass it forwards.

Drinkwater 2 - seemed totally incapable of passing the ball to one of our players without playing them into trouble. Easily knocked off the ball.

Schlupp 5 - looks so dangerous until he has to engage his brain.

Nugent 4 - might as well not have been there. Gets a 4 for running his nuts off as usual and nearly scoring a brilliant goal.

Vardy 4 - not good enough.

Subs:

Kramaric 5 - some decent runs but let's call a spade a spade, he wasn't great. Can hardly blame him given we seemed incapable of getting the ball to him.

Ulloa 4 - won a couple of headers but looked like it was an inconvenience for him to have to play.

Lawrence 2 - Absolutely dreadful.

Posted

Hamer 4 Kicking pathetic. To do that so many times from a dead ball is inexcusable

Simpson 5 I really miss De Laet's runs forward. Simpson's distribution was dreadful today.

Wasilewski 5 Stupid booking, even more stupid challenge on Begovic. Almost gave a penalty away too. Poor day for him

Morgan 5 Seeing it live, I thought he was at fault for the goal. Don't know why he let Walters get to the ball first. Would have to see it again though

Konchesky 5 Average

Knockaert 6 Some lovely touches and worked hard

Drinkwater 4 Gave it away so often, looked like a different player to last season. So poor

King 5 Ineffective as usual

Schlupp 6 Good first half but faded out of the game. Looked disinterested second half but maybe he wasn't fully fit

Nugent 6 Not great. Great effort in the first half though

Vardy 6 thought he was much better than the last few and was a threat with his pace. We lost any attacking threat when he went off because we started hoofing it forward and had no outlet.

Ulloa 4 Cumbersome

Kramaric 6 Showed some lovely touches. Let's hope we can give him service

Lawrence 3 Pathetic.

So poor today. Too much hoof ball giving the strikers no chance. Totally outmuscled in the middle of the park. Outnumbered there. Should have had 3 but I guess we only had 2 fit.

Posted

Hamer 7 poor distribution but otherwise sound.

Simpson 6 our best defender

Wasyl 6 restrained because of yellow card for most of the match

Wes 6 mostly competent

Konch 6 better than usual but gives away ball

Knockhaert 6 some inventive play but often out of position when they have the bakk

King 6 best passer of our side

Drinkwater 5 loses ball.

Schlupp 5 good first half abesent in second.

Vardy 2 no place to start in the Prem

Nugent 2 same as Vardy. Why do we start a team that has scored twice in 20 games?

Subs:7 Kramic looks good with the ball

Posted

Both centre mids were definitely rated at 4 at the very best. We were very poor second half! Just got overpowered in midfield far too easily! Strikers who started were also a very poor choice and never looked scoring! However knockaerts performances are promising

Posted

Simpson defensively solid & our best defender lol

 

He was all over the place, not De Laet's biggest fan but after today he needs to come back in.

Posted

Hamer 7 poor distribution but otherwise sound.

Simpson 6 our best defender

Wasyl 6 restrained because of yellow card for most of the match

Wes 6 mostly competent

Konch 6 better than usual but gives away ball

Knockhaert 6 some inventive play but often out of position when they have the bakk

King 6 best passer of our side

Drinkwater 5 loses ball.

Schlupp 5 good first half abesent in second.

Vardy 2 no place to start in the Prem

Nugent 2 same as Vardy. Why do we start a team that has scored twice in 20 games?

Subs:7 Kramic looks good with the ball

Agree with that apart from Kramaric getting a 7 lol

Posted

4's all round except for Pearson, Lawrence, Vardy & Nugent (3) and Knockaert/Schlupp (5).

 

Stoke get a 7. One of the best sides to come here this season for me although they were playing a side who played into their hands.

 

Referee a 5. Some questionable decisions but slightly better than the corrupt wankers we've had of late.

Posted

10 -

9 -

8 - Referee

7 -

6 - Stoke

5 - Knockeart, Schlupp

4 - Pearson, Hamer, Kramaric, Nugent, Drinkwater, King, Was, Morgan, Simpson, Vardy

3 - Ulloa

2 - Konchesky, Lawrence

1 -

 

Konchesky - When will he be dropped? Another game, another Konchesky meltdown. Costing us vital points.

 

Lawrence - Highly ineffective.

 

Simpson and Was - Good defenders but distribution is an issue.

 

Pearson - Cringed when I saw that Vardy and Nugent were starting together. Albrighton? Konchesky selected again. Bad day at the office for him and his staff.

 

A new LB is beyond vital, without one we WILL be relegated.

Posted

knockaert was our best player today. stoke impressed me a bit, they played with the pace and fluidity that i had expected us to play with. ref pretty good too but he didnt have much to do

Posted

All 5's and 6's - bar Schlupp (7)

 

Stoke 7

 

Marriner 8 (not that it was a hard one to officiate but good to see an absence of inexplicable calls)

Posted

Simpson defensively solid & our best defender lol

 

He was all over the place, not De Laet's biggest fan but after today he needs to come back in.

 

This. Simpson was raped all game. I notice that he likes to tuck in and make the back 4 very narrow and expects Knocky to deal with the opposition winger. Often this seems to allow the opposition to double up on Knocky before he comes out to deal with it. I think he's been solid the past few weeks, but he was gash today.

Posted

Pearson - 2 (stay) Questionable selection, subs and tactics today.

 

Hamer - 4 Made some decent saves but distribution was just horrendous.

Simpson - 3 Not sure if I'm a fan of him. All he seems to do is back off until another player comes in and tackles for him. Distribution was poor as well.

Wasyl - 5 Solid for the most part although probably could have got closer to Bojan for the goal.

Morgan - 6 Solid for the most part as well, and probably the defender that was trying to keep it on the floor for us the most.

Konchesky - 4 Given the run around a fair amount, and just aimlessly hoofed it whenever he got the ball.

 

Knockaert - 6 Decent defensive effort, no one made any movement for him to create anything with.

King - 3 May as well have not been playing in the second half.

Drinkwater - 3 Just doesn't look the player from last season.

Schlupp - 6 Made some good runs and crosses, just a shame Vardy was the one in the box.

 

Nugent - 3 Too slow with the ball and looked like he would lose it every time it came to him.

Vardy - 4 A lot of huff and puff as usual, but just doesn't have the quality to match it at this level.

 

Kramaric - 6 Looked fairly decent in his brief cameo.

Ulloa - N/A Literally did nothing.

Lawrence - N/A Needs to go out on loan again, looks massively out of his depth.

 

Stoke - 7 Effective in what they did.

 

Ref - 4 Consistent, but that was consistently allowing the Stoke players to have their arms all over our players, even remember one of their players having one of ours in a headlock when the ball was crossed in one time.

Posted

Simpson did not put in a 6 performance today, knocky helped him out continually and the help wasn't reciprocated when we went forward. He's been dependable previously but today he was poor and his distribution was sub-konch standard.

This. Simpson was raped all game. I notice that he likes to tuck in and make the back 4 very narrow and expects Knocky to deal with the opposition winger. Often this seems to allow the opposition to double up on Knocky before he comes out to deal with it. I think he's been solid the past few weeks, but he was gash today.

This
Posted

Hamer 4 - kicking was an absolute embarrassment.

Simpson 5 - decent defensively but he may aswell just not bother going forward.

Wasyl 6 - another good performance.

Morgan 4 - needs replacing asap. Most uninspiring captain ever.

Konchesky 4 - decent defensively but ineffective going forward.

Knockaert 5 - decent first half but wavered in the second.

Drinkwater 5 - ok but looked shattered after an hour. Think he's injured.

King 3 - completely bullied as usual. Must be the most basic player ever.

Schlupp 6 - had a good first half and terrorised their defence. Probably tired in the second.

Nugent 5 - tried to no avail.

Vardy 3 - headless chicken who's not good enough at this level i'm afraid. Should take the 5m and run.

Subs:

Ulloa 4 - no service really.

Kramaric 5 - looked like he definitely has something about him.

Lawrence 2 - don't think he touched the ball at all. My only explanation for him coming on was that Pearson mistaked him for Albrighton and hoped that no one would notice after it was too late.

Posted

Schlupp and Knockaert 6's rest 4's and 5's except King and Simpson who got 3's. Not a King fan at all and today didn't change that, Simpson offers nothing going forward and to play with two full backs like that seriously hamper our attacking threat. Prefer De Laet even though he is probably weaker defensively.

Posted

Highest performer on the pitch: Schlupp- 7

Lowest performer on the pitch: King- 4

 

Pearson's rating today: 2

Stoke's rating: 6 (First half they would have got a 2 but they massively improved second half even without having to make any substitutions at half time) 

 

Ref's rating: 6

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...