Gerard Posted 7 July 2016 Posted 7 July 2016 I can't see us playing 433 too often, we just won the league playing 442 or 4411. Well @@ramadaone who is an established ITK said this about Luan "If this lad is an out and out No. 10 then you can forget it". That insinuates to me that 4-3-3 will be our formation of choice and Ranieri has said he'd like to play it before.
Babylon Posted 7 July 2016 Posted 7 July 2016 Well @@ramadaone who is an established ITK said this about Luan "If this lad is an out and out No. 10 then you can forget it". That insinuates to me that 4-3-3 will be our formation of choice and Ranieri has said he'd like to play it before. OR it could mean we'll continue how we have all season without a specialist No.10.
Gerard Posted 7 July 2016 Posted 7 July 2016 OR it could mean we'll continue how we have all season without a specialist No.10. Why would we play a No 10 but not sign someone because they are an "out and out No 10"?
Babylon Posted 7 July 2016 Posted 7 July 2016 Why would we play a No 10 but not sign someone because they are an "out and out No 10"? Because we don't want to play with an out and out 10, like we didn't this? Okazaki is way more defensive and much less attacking that what most (I presume), would class as a normal 10. Just chucking another reason out there, Ram' talks in riddles so there are half a dozen potential meanings.
ScouseFox Posted 7 July 2016 Posted 7 July 2016 Why would we play a No 10 but not sign someone because they are an "out and out No 10"? why would we win the league playing different variations of 4-4-2 and then use pretty much the same squad to play a 4-3-3?
Babylon Posted 7 July 2016 Posted 7 July 2016 why would we win the league playing different variations of 4-4-2 and then use pretty much the same squad to play a 4-3-3?
FireFox Posted 7 July 2016 Posted 7 July 2016 Well @@ramadaone who is an established ITK said this about Luan "If this lad is an out and out No. 10 then you can forget it". That insinuates to me that 4-3-3 will be our formation of choice and Ranieri has said he'd like to play it before. Not only that. He has straight out said a couple of times that we are looking to play 433 if we get the required signings (which it looks like we have with Mendy and Musa).
Gerard Posted 7 July 2016 Posted 7 July 2016 Not only that. He has straight out said a couple of times that we are looking to play 433 if we get the required signings (which it looks like we have with Mendy and Musa). It looks like 4-3-3 if we keep Kante as we can play our best players. Mendy Kante Drinkwater ---------------- Musa Vardy Mahrez Maybe Kante and DD playing as box to box MF's?
ScouseFox Posted 11 July 2016 Posted 11 July 2016 in the euro championship team of the year after a few motm performances. not good enough for our squad. nice.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 11 July 2016 Posted 11 July 2016 in the euro championship team of the year after a few motm performances. not good enough for our squad. nice. We'd have walked the Euros.
Dr The Singh Posted 20 July 2016 Posted 20 July 2016 8 minutes ago, Will1981 said: Liverpool have accepted £13m bid from Stoke. Sounds reasonable
Cadno'r Cymoedd Posted 20 July 2016 Posted 20 July 2016 We could have done that. Hard working skilful player.
AjcW Posted 20 July 2016 Posted 20 July 2016 1 hour ago, Will1981 said: Liverpool have accepted £13m bid from Stoke. Could mean we've beaten them to Lemina...
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 20 July 2016 Posted 20 July 2016 7 minutes ago, AjcW said: Could mean we've beaten them to Lemina... Let's hope so
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.