Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
bald reynard

Marcel Tisserand

Recommended Posts

Posted

According to Sport Witness (?!), we're competing with Arsenal and Espanyol to sign Marcel Tisserand from Monaco.  He can play right back or central defence.

Posted

Gerrimin.. Who is he? Can he kick a ball? Is any good at Subbuteo?

 

Good signing.

Posted

Is he a right back who can play centre half or a centre half that can play right back?

 

If it's the former then get him in, if not then no ta.

Posted
1 minute ago, AKCJ said:

Is he a right back who can play centre half or a centre half that can play right back?

 

If it's the former then get him in, if not then no ta.

What's the difference? You wAnt a player who can play in two positions but if he plays in two positions you don't want him?

confused.com

Posted
8 minutes ago, themightyfin said:

What's the difference? You wAnt a player who can play in two positions but if he plays in two positions you don't want him?

confused.com

by his post he wants a rb who is capable at filling in at cb rather than a cb who can fill in at rb

Posted
9 minutes ago, themightyfin said:

What's the difference? You wAnt a player who can play in two positions but if he plays in two positions you don't want him?

confused.com

Paul Konchesky used to be a left back that could play centre half.

 

Left back is his better position but he could play centre half is necessary.

 

We need a new right back more than we need a new centre back.

Posted
20 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

Paul Konchesky used to be a left back that could play centre half.

 

Left back is his better position but he could play centre half is necessary.

 

We need a new right back more than we need a new centre back.

Yeah I get that but people her then have the following opinion. If he's a CB who can play RB they say not good enough to play RB we need someone else. Or if we have a RB who can play CB we get ...not good enough to play CB.

Best thing is to say we need a Player who is a CB and a RB and a RB and a CB 

who would be a utility man these days?!

Maybe it's because they are just not quite good enough to hold down a regular place in the team in a set position so they have to become players who play in more positions. AKA Schlupp as much as we love him.

Posted
2 minutes ago, themightyfin said:

Yeah I get that but people her then have the following opinion. If he's a CB who can play RB they say not good enough to play RB we need someone else. Or if we have a RB who can play CB we get ...not good enough to play CB.

Best thing is to say we need a Player who is a CB and a RB and a RB and a CB 

who would be a utility man these days?!

Maybe it's because they are just not quite good enough to hold down a regular place in the team in a set position so they have to become players who play in more positions. AKA Schlupp as much as we love him.

They're good to have in your squad, but we're okay for centre halves with Wes, Was, Huth, Hernandez and, if we need him, Benny.

 

If Simpson gets injured then we're fecked IMO. Which is why I'd rather sign someone who's favoured position is right back.

Posted

Having denied Arsenal in their attempts to sign Jamie and Riyad it would just be the delicious icing on the cake if we swooped in and took this guy from them too. Worth the transfer fee alone just for the flack Wenger would take from their fans. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...