Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
ajthefox

UK to censor online videos of 'non-conventional' sex acts

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/23/censor-non-conventional-sex-acts-online-internet-pornography

 

Say what you like about getting turned on by people pissing on each other, but so long as everyone involved in making the film is consenting and not breaking the law there is no harm in it. People are free to watch it if they want to.

 

What pornographic material can and can't be filmed being limited to what is deemed 'conventional' by a bunch of mps is a significant infringement of peoples freedoms. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, ajthefox said:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/23/censor-non-conventional-sex-acts-online-internet-pornography

 

Say what you like about getting turned on by people pissing on each other, but so long as everyone involved in making the film is consenting and not breaking the law there is no harm in it. People are free to watch it if they want to.

 

What pornographic material can and can't be filmed being limited to what is deemed 'conventional' by a bunch of mps is a significant infringement of peoples freedoms. 

 

 

This is probably a reaction to the Whole Ian Watkins thing....

Posted
7 minutes ago, MPH said:

 

 

This is probably a reaction to the Whole Ian Watkins thing....

 

I don't follow.

 

What Ian Watkins did is already illegal.

 

Child Porn is illegal, assaulting / killing people is illegal, having sex with animals is (I think?) illegal.

 

Not sure why you'd need extra laws to crack down on those things?

 

If you read the link it's actually just talking about things like spanking or a bit of consenting s&m, why are we censoring that but you can watch mass murder or whatever else in a cinema? 

Posted

Agreed.

 

There will be a lot of tongue in cheek comments on this thread I expect but it's a serious issue.

 

Governments seem very intent on censoring pornography which, whilst inappropriate for children is pretty harmless but fairly lax about the real danger to youngsters which is social media. Why not have blocks and age restrictions on facebook instead? Why not have tight restrictions on horror films, which in my opinion could be far more scarring to a child?

 

Or are we just still being run by a religious state?

 

(P.S. I'm not into pissing videos)

Posted

Absolutely pathetic. Is this the standard we can expect now that we can 'make our own laws'?

 

Make britain great again by hammering down on personal freedom and letting mps treat other people like children.

 

Posted

To be fair, if its MP's that are deciding what is and isn't 'conventional' there'll still be some pretty sick stuff which will be absolutely fine to watch!

Posted
11 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

I don't follow.

 

What Ian Watkins did is already illegal.

 

Child Porn is illegal, assaulting / killing people is illegal, having sex with animals is (I think?) illegal.

 

Not sure why you'd need extra laws to crack down on those things?

 

If you read the link it's actually just talking about things like spanking or a bit of consenting s&m, why are we censoring that but you can watch mass murder or whatever else in a cinema? 

Don't play innocent and naive ffs.

Posted

But how can the Bullingdon Club continue to provide outstanding Tory Prime Ministers if they can't stick their Percivals in non-conventional orifices???? 

Posted
1 hour ago, Kitchandro said:

Agreed.

 

There will be a lot of tongue in cheek  I expect it's a serious issue.

 

 

That should definitely be censored

Posted
1 hour ago, Finnegan said:

 

I don't follow.

 

What Ian Watkins did is already illegal.

 

Child Porn is illegal, assaulting / killing people is illegal, having sex with animals is (I think?) illegal.

 

Not sure why you'd need extra laws to crack down on those things?

 

If you read the link it's actually just talking about things like spanking or a bit of consenting s&m, why are we censoring that but you can watch mass murder or whatever else in a cinema? 

I think it might have something to do with the U.S recently giving up control of the internet. 

 

l it might be illegal, but that doesnt stop people having access to it because we dont/ didnt control the the internet... Maybe some of this is now about giving us the power to decide what comes into this country through the internet Now that Countries can have more of a say...

Posted
2 minutes ago, MPH said:

I think it might have something to do with the U.S recently giving up control of the internet. 

 

l it might be illegal, but that doesnt stop people having access to it because we dont/ didnt control the the internet... Maybe some of this is now about giving us the power to decide what comes into this country through the internet Now that Countries can have more of a say...

It probably is. And it's still Puritan BS.

Posted

Pathetic puritanical rubbish as per usual with successive governments. This sort of thing is the only reason why I would have considered staying in the EU.

Posted
8 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

It probably is. And it's still Puritan BS.

 

 

 

You seem very... affected by this decision.... :whistle:

Posted
3 minutes ago, MPH said:

 

 

 

You seem very... affected by this decision.... :whistle:

Ha! Nah, that's not my angle here.

 

I could articulate myself a little more in the way that some of the posters above have done about exactly why it isn't a good idea, but it looked like that had been done already. I would think being aggravated at a government attempting to legislate morality is enough reason to be annoyed about this one. And add to that the hypocrisy of many of our dear representatives who do like to partake in that sort of thing (pigs heads and all that)...

 

Really, the entire British attitude towards matters of the bedroom has always been laughably repressed (except in a nudge nudge wink wink kind of way) and it's a shame that this is being reflected in this new attempted legislation.

Posted
16 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

Ha! Nah, that's not my angle here.

 

I could articulate myself a little more in the way that some of the posters above have done about exactly why it isn't a good idea, but it looked like that had been done already. I would think being aggravated at a government attempting to legislate morality is enough reason to be annoyed about this one. And add to that the hypocrisy of many of our dear representatives who do like to partake in that sort of thing (pigs heads and all that)...

 

Really, the entire British attitude towards matters of the bedroom has always been laughably repressed (except in a nudge nudge wink wink kind of way) and it's a shame that this is being reflected in this new attempted legislation.

 

 

i'm all for personal responsibility..

Posted

Just the beginning. Take out porn, other things will follow that bitchlips May wont allow. 

 

In 2 years I'll be tugging it to exposed ankles on pornhub

Posted

Isn't  this another example of the politics moving away from the centre to the extremes of left or right?

Posted

I'm sick of being told what I can do and how I should think by these tories. I'm going to get back at them by asking for a pay cut tomorrow. Less tax for them!! Baahahaha no to the istablishmunt power to the peepul!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...