Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Tuna said:

I don't think we are sacking him before Villa.

 

The statement should have been out before the coach left Brighton, but I think Rodgers will get Villa although he absolutely shouldn't.

 

We've always heard Percy "on the brink" and "set to be sacked" articles but there is none of this; I question our appetite for sacking Rodgers or our affordability to do so.

Villa could be crucial, you'd think its important to get it done before villa 

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Shane said:

If it was truly dire we wouldn’t have signed Wout Faes and gave him a 5 year contract, or tried to get Boga on loan who would have added to the wage bill?
 

I’m sure there’s some wiggle room to get rid of Brendan, his staff and get a new manager in. We could put him on gardening leave for a start.

 

9 minutes ago, Shane said:

If it was truly dire we wouldn’t have signed Wout Faes and gave him a 5 year contract, or tried to get Boga on loan who would have added to the wage bill?
 

I’m sure there’s some wiggle room to get rid of Brendan, his staff and get a new manager in. We could put him on gardening leave for a start.

They were not looking to sack Rodgers after 3-4 games whilst Fofana was on his way, or Faes being negotiated.

 

They have saved on Kaspers and Fofanas wages.

 

The clubs are pissed off that Vestegaard wouldnt move and it was down to his contract.

 

 

Edited by Mok
Posted
1 minute ago, An Sionnach said:

Whatever happens with Rodgers , King Power will have to sell. Running a top PL club with inadequate finances is impossible.

Could get some investment like West Ham have done.

Posted
1 minute ago, An Sionnach said:

Whatever happens with Rodgers , King Power will have to sell. Running a top PL club with inadequate finances is impossible.

Its FFP thats holding us back, not the owners

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, turtmcfly said:

 

I've hit this page to see what's going on and have seen this post, then gone back a few page and started to wonder...

 

Is there concrete evidence/a good source saying anything to the effect that we 'cannot afford to sack him'?

 

 

 

At the moment purely conjecture.  This needs to be flipped i.e. we CANNOT afford NOT to sack him. 

Edited by mozartfox
  • Like 4
Posted
41 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

If there is, then who ever agreed to this needs to sit on the naughty step.  A clause that states if you achieve 1pt out of 18 and your gone, makes more sense.

That’s what I meant. Minimum expected or else 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RoboFox said:

Feels like it would've happened by now if it was going to. 

Yes no briefing or even job under serious  threat by journalists. 
 

:brendan_still:

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Mok said:

Its FFP thats holding us back, not the owners

Top’s value has allegedly gone down from £5bn to £1.5bn 2 years and Thailand hasn’t opened up like Europe has for travellers. It’s going to be another couple of years realistically until KP start get back to pre-pandemic incomings, by which point Top’s income will be nowhere near enough to sustain a PL football club.

 

The idea that “it’s FFP that’s holding us back” seems quite naive to me. Of course we’re not privy to all information, but it feels like there’s much more to it than just FFP. 

Edited by Sampson
  • Like 3
Posted

We know that he won't walk, but at what point does staying here and making things worse become more damaging for him? If we get relegated without putting up any fight then surely potential future employers will see through the 'I wasn't backed' rhetoric. His reputation has taken quite the hit over the past year, despite people still standing up for him. 

Guest Mickyblueeyes
Posted

It’s not an easy decision for the board. As much as it is for us, based on how the KP group have ran us, they have invested in Rodgers for the long run. I honestly believe Top had ideas that Rodgers would be here for 10 years - unthinkable in football terms but you look at the approach. We backed him with the 4th highest salary in the league. The only way he leaves by choice is to one of the truly elite - no one else can afford him. 
 

We backed him on transfers. The training ground. The investment off the field. The recruitment team. 
 

We’ve done everything for a long term project and Brendan was/is very much a part of that from KPs perspective. Naive ? Absolutely but it does make the inevitable sacking, restructuring, change of direction even harder. 

Posted

Top has some serious questions to answer if Rodge is still in charge for Villa game. Do you think he’s doing a good job? Or is the financial situation bad as rumoured? 
 

 

Posted
Just now, Tanya said:

It also is really early, it's not even 11am.

 

It is here....

  • Haha 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

So we need to find a replacement Coach who will accept deferred salary payments. It gets better by the minute.

Something like! But, yes, there will be a way. A loan manager from OHL? Where there's a will, there's a way. I don't fret about that one. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Mok said:

 

They were not looking to sack Rodgers after 3-4 games whilst Fofana was on his way, or Faes being negotiated.

 

They have saved on Kaspers and Fofanas wages.

 

The clubs are pissed off that Vestegaard wouldnt move and it was down to his contract.

 

 

Vestegaard would have hardly made a difference? He's on roughly 80k? And we'd have had to subsidise his wages by 30k or so even if he did move, so 50k a week we'd have saved, 2.5m a year? Hardly anything.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

It’s not an easy decision for the board. As much as it is for us, based on how the KP group have ran us, they have invested in Rodgers for the long run. I honestly believe Top had ideas that Rodgers would be here for 10 years - unthinkable in football terms but you look at the approach. We backed him with the 4th highest salary in the league. The only way he leaves by choice is to one of the truly elite - no one else can afford him. 
 

We backed him on transfers. The training ground. The investment off the field. The recruitment team. 
 

We’ve done everything for a long term project and Brendan was/is very much a part of that from KPs perspective. Naive ? Absolutely but it does make the inevitable sacking, restructuring, change of direction even harder. 

Yes, but massively naive of Top given Brendan's record, and certainly the situation we are in now has not come out of the blue. I'm sure when he was interviewed Brendan said previous failing were everyone elses fault, and now Top has learnt this the hard way.

 

Got to move on. Cannot continue. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...