Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
46 minutes ago, ramadaone said:

Thought they signed lads at the end of their under 8 season so May time

But the age group goes through to August 31st so not all the players will be 9 when they sign

Guess that answers the question about what you know

 

So mainly 9 year olds then....thought that was the case but thanks for confirming that.  :thumbup:

Posted
12 hours ago, lcfc sheff said:

Maswanhise, what do we reckon? I think he looks very promising… maybe keep him around the first team first half of this season?

There's definitely something about him. Extremely raw so I think it's a delicate situation with how to manage him. The wrong loan move could really send him backwards so wonder whether it's worth keeping him around the first team squad in case there's a chance for him (so in agreement with you).

 

Still got some growing to do but I'm cautiously optimistic about him. And by that I mean that for whatever reason, I just have this feeling that he could properly burst onto the scene and be absolutely quality but trying be temper my expectations :D

Posted
24 minutes ago, rachhere said:

 

Looking forward to this later. I wonder who the players with first team experience will be... is that where Perez is?! 

If it's Perez, that would be a bad sign for his future. My guess it's some of the Academy kids that got bench time/cameos last season. Jake Wakeling seems pretty good (based on his numbers, haven't seen him play.) I wonder if he'll be off on loan this year?

Posted
3 minutes ago, MarriedaLeicesterGirl said:

If it's Perez, that would be a bad sign for his future. My guess it's some of the Academy kids that got bench time/cameos last season. Jake Wakeling seems pretty good (based on his numbers, haven't seen him play.) I wonder if he'll be off on loan this year?

Yeah just joking really, but a bit weird he hasn't featured yet... I recall the same happened last year with him as well. Leshabella has featured for the first team, so he's a good bet. Not sure what the latest is with Tavares, but you never know, I might have some good news to pass onto @Ric Flairby the end of the day! 

  • Haha 1
Posted

There's been some covid cases in and around the club I think so I'm not so sure how much mixing they'll have been between those training with the 1st team in recent weeks and those very much separate with the U23's. Don't forget our first team have been away in Surrey all week and are still there.

Posted
10 hours ago, rachhere said:

 

Looking forward to this later. I wonder who the players with first team experience will be... is that where Perez is?! 

we're currently 1-0 up. No idea of the line up or who scored. 

Posted

Just heading back from the match. BrayBrooke with the first goal and a penalty for Jake wakeling. I was the opposite side, but couldn’t see Beaglehole there.

 

Sammy BrayBrooke by far our stand out player.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, rachhere said:

Just heading back from the match. BrayBrooke with the first goal and a penalty for Jake wakeling. I was the opposite side, but couldn’t see Beaglehole there.

 

Sammy BrayBrooke by far our stand out player.

Who were the supposed "first team experienced" youth players that featured?

Posted

Oh and George Hirst was playing. Really did not impress at all unfortunately. He went off early though so maybe a injury, but I really don’t see him having a future with us. 

  • Like 3
Posted
Just now, moore_94 said:

Who were the supposed "first team experienced" youth players that featured?

Hirst, Leshabella. Mitch Clark played too who I guess is pretty experienced. I like him actually - no idea where VDC was preferred ahead of him 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, rachhere said:

Hirst, Leshabella. Mitch Clark played too who I guess is pretty experienced. I like him actually - no idea where VDC was preferred ahead of him 

Mitch Clark is surprising, I guess Blackpool have decided to not take him on loan after his trial

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted
Just now, rachhere said:

Just to emphasise again just how good Sammy Braybrooke is - seriously exciting prospect 

Did grist play?

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted
5 minutes ago, rachhere said:

I think so? There was a player who could be him if he’s had a haircut!

Thoughts?

Posted
1 minute ago, Chocolate Teapot said:

Thoughts?

Now I am wondering if it was him playing CB rather than in midfield actually. Sorry, I am a terrible reporter! They didn’t do any team announcements or substitution announcements so that didn’t help. If it’s the guy I think it was he didn’t especially stand out to me in all honesty, but then didn’t do anything disastrously wrong. 

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted
8 minutes ago, rachhere said:

Now I am wondering if it was him playing CB rather than in midfield actually. Sorry, I am a terrible reporter! They didn’t do any team announcements or substitution announcements so that didn’t help. If it’s the guy I think it was he didn’t especially stand out to me in all honesty, but then didn’t do anything disastrously wrong. 

There is some confusion over his actual position so it would make sense.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Chocolate Teapot said:

There is some confusion over his actual position so it would make sense.

It’s what threw me! I was thinking he was the defender but then searched for a pic and saw him listed as a midfielder! 

Posted
17 hours ago, rachhere said:

Hirst, Leshabella. Mitch Clark played too who I guess is pretty experienced. I like him actually - no idea where VDC was preferred ahead of him 

because Clark was loaned out and VDC didn't need to be registered in the 25 man squad

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, jamesmilner said:

Some comments on here belong in the ‘fiction’ part of a library ! 

Hi Steve, what's your new role?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...