Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

I'd love to see a tally of Rodgers tactical changes that lost points vs ones that gained them. 

I would love to see the goals conceded / Vestergaard mins play ratio. Actually I wouldn’t love it but I’m interested. 

Posted
Just now, Tom12345 said:

For the purposes of determining handball offences, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit. Not every touch of a player’s hand/arm with the ball is an offence.

 

So it was a handball?

No. We just hoped it was 

Posted

Who else Cried when Vasterguard's face turned up on the sidelines for Tielmans, I nearly bought my Sunday dinner up when the corner happened, as you just knew the equaliser came, just sums our season up.

 

Still we played better and got a point I suppose, feels like a loss though.

  • Like 1
Posted

Ok...

 

I thought the first half was shocking. Same old crap. No fight, crap going forward, arguing with each other and half our team didn't even bother to celebrate our equaliser.

 

To be fair to the lads, they fought back. Showed a bit of balls and more importantly, some half decent football. For 30 minutes there, Barnes looked like he did before he was injured. KDH ran the midfield, Ricardo played well. Maddison and Daka ran their socks of and Thomas really dug in. 

 

But ultimately, it's all for nothing if you can't defend a set play. I honestly don't think that the sub made a differance as their corner came like 3 seconds later but how can a man the size of Vestergaard not jump more than 3 inches of the ground? It wasn't his man but he had a clear header at it and should have got it. 

 

I'm disappointed, ofcourse I am but let's be honest, it was much better.  

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Royston. said:

Inexplicably LAME start but I'll take the point.

 

Not for a second did I think we would hold the lead.

 

What a total nightmare.

Top, I'm begging you, pay the twat off:@

We can’t afford to

Posted
5 minutes ago, Matt_Lcfc said:

Lacklustre first half but a number of positives to take from the second. However, yet again, our failure to do the basics has cost us again. It’s beyond jarring at this point.

 

On the positive side, I thought that Ricardo, Tielemans, KDH and Maddison all had decent games.

Barnes and Thomas too. Much better second half. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Throwing on Vestergaard at the end just gifts the initiative to West Ham to lump the ball long. Unfortunately for Rodgers minutes after making that sub we concede.

Posted (edited)

It's a shit rule but technically it's not a hand-ball. Hits the top of his arm. 

 

 

FLfzv6MXEAE0LZ-?format=jpg&name=small

 

 

FLfzviWXEAE2Sck?format=jpg&name=large

 

 

More annoyed at our pathetic attempt at defending yet another set-piece and 90+ minute goal. 

Edited by EnderbyFox
Posted
6 minutes ago, KingsX said:

A good friend’s girl is a Hammers fan from Bexley.  We owe them dinner.  They were so close to getting invited for Tuesday night  :frantics:

 

 

matchstats.thumb.JPG.d0ceeb37bf7e4904a33a14aaf4b632c6.JPG

sent the postcode, leave a turd on the doorstep instead  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...