Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, bellab said:

The fact that most of the LCFC girls academy teams were axed at the end of this season suggests they have been given cost saving targets going forwards. Unless the idea is to pump this money into buying new players for the woman's squad ..?!

I did wonder if survival would bring a change around regarding the academy but was told apparently not as I’d heard a couple of months back that funding was increasing into the women’s side regardless, though how much of this is coming from the fa for their pro pathway im not sure. 

Posted
20 hours ago, bellab said:

Sophia Poor just announced on Instagram she's leaving LCFC. Looks like she's off to Valencia. She put in a great performance for England U17 against Spain recently. Hopefully she'll be back.

.. fantastic ti have brought Leitzig in but we could have switched Poor for either Levell our Lambourne sometime ago!!!

  How on earth is Levell still at the club, I do not know. 

Posted
1 hour ago, sacreblueits442 said:

.. fantastic ti have brought Leitzig in but we could have switched Poor for either Levell our Lambourne sometime ago!!!

  How on earth is Levell still at the club, I do not know. 

Well she might get let go if Leitziq commits.

Posted
27 minutes ago, Jimmy said:

Kirstie Levell has announced she's leaving

...she needs to look to and work on her game, with a private coach!!!

The mistakes she made and just how poor she was, make you wonder why we ever chose her to be number 1. Lambourne was much better, but Poor is more likely to be the #1 if Leitzig chooses not to come.

 I hope she works on her game because, at the level that she is at, I would be surprised if anyone picks her up.

 

Posted
34 minutes ago, sacreblueits442 said:

...she needs to look to and work on her game, with a private coach!!!

The mistakes she made and just how poor she was, make you wonder why we ever chose her to be number 1. Lambourne was much better, but Poor is more likely to be the #1 if Leitzig chooses not to come.

 I hope she works on her game because, at the level that she is at, I would be surprised if anyone picks her up.

 

Poor has gone too hasn't she?

Posted
7 minutes ago, sacreblueits442 said:

...i am not aware of that, just checked her Twitter but it seems out of date!!!

Poor has left aswell

  • Like 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, sacreblueits442 said:

...she needs to look to and work on her game, with a private coach!!!

The mistakes she made and just how poor she was, make you wonder why we ever chose her to be number 1. Lambourne was much better, but Poor is more likely to be the #1 if Leitzig chooses not to come.

 I hope she works on her game because, at the level that she is at, I would be surprised if anyone picks her up.

 

What is her Levell then?

  • Haha 2
Posted

Leicester City's Women have announced that 12 players have been released from the club at the end of their current contracts Thy include Molly Pike and Jemma Purfield, who were first team regulars in The Foxes' second season in the WSL.

 

Sophie Barker Tash Flint Kirstie Levell Charlie Devlin Lachante Paul Molly Pike Jess Sigsworth Abbie McNamus Connie Scofield Jemma Purfield Ellen Jones Georgia Eaton-Collins.

 

 

Posted

Abbie McManus is a shame but a bit of a Jonny Evans situation, just never fit to actually apply her class. 

 

Purfield going means I'm guessing we're making Nevins loan permanent 

  • Like 1
Posted

On a related note, Reading who we were pretty much level with all year, with them ending up relegated have just announced they are going from full time to part time as a result of their relegation https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/65820385

 

A sad state of the women's game that they just aren't able to compete financially.

 

When you take a step back and look at football clubs in this country, you have the rich 6, then in the next tier down, historically, you could put another 4 clubs there of West Ham, Newcastle, Villa, & Everton - clubs with bigger grounds and followings and pretty much mainstays of the top division in the men's game (could make an argument for Leeds in there, but still they haven't really recovered from their 2004 relegation).

 

With these clubs all now interested in the women's game (except Newcastle, whose ownership values may conflict with the WSL), you look at last year's table & between them, those 9 clubs make up the top 9 places. Outside of that, it was Leicester, Brighton and Reading scraping along the bottom while some of the more historic women's teams - Yeovil, Doncaster Belles nowhere to be seen.

 

It does show the size of the task facing our women to just avoid relegation, and that the consequences of it might be more severe for the women than it is for the men.

  • Like 1
Posted

Word was Nevin is as good as done and we’re hopeful on Leitzig & even trying for Jones (latter depends on if United can get their targets in/lines up, if they do they’re unlikely to trigger her contract extension)

 

As for the 12 out, it’s a lot, even for women’s football but its indicative of the summer we’re planning for…there’s a budget and a sizeable one at that.

 

Hopefully signifies CJ Bott has signed a new deal too, wasn’t certain of it a week or so ago.

 

Theres plenty other out of contract but they were all expected to stay.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Golden Fox said:

On a related note, Reading who we were pretty much level with all year, with them ending up relegated have just announced they are going from full time to part time as a result of their relegation https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/65820385

 

A sad state of the women's game that they just aren't able to compete financially.

 

When you take a step back and look at football clubs in this country, you have the rich 6, then in the next tier down, historically, you could put another 4 clubs there of West Ham, Newcastle, Villa, & Everton - clubs with bigger grounds and followings and pretty much mainstays of the top division in the men's game (could make an argument for Leeds in there, but still they haven't really recovered from their 2004 relegation).

 

With these clubs all now interested in the women's game (except Newcastle, whose ownership values may conflict with the WSL), you look at last year's table & between them, those 9 clubs make up the top 9 places. Outside of that, it was Leicester, Brighton and Reading scraping along the bottom while some of the more historic women's teams - Yeovil, Doncaster Belles nowhere to be seen.

 

It does show the size of the task facing our women to just avoid relegation, and that the consequences of it might be more severe for the women than it is for the men.

Reading is a somewhat unique case in that the team as a whole are up shit creek due to dodgy owners who've ran it into the ground (men's team were relegated after a points deduction for breaching a financial rescue plan imposed on them by the EFL), but even in the championship most women's teams are full time professional outfits 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Golden Fox said:

On a related note, Reading who we were pretty much level with all year, with them ending up relegated have just announced they are going from full time to part time as a result of their relegation https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/65820385

 

A sad state of the women's game that they just aren't able to compete financially.

 

When you take a step back and look at football clubs in this country, you have the rich 6, then in the next tier down, historically, you could put another 4 clubs there of West Ham, Newcastle, Villa, & Everton - clubs with bigger grounds and followings and pretty much mainstays of the top division in the men's game (could make an argument for Leeds in there, but still they haven't really recovered from their 2004 relegation).

 

With these clubs all now interested in the women's game (except Newcastle, whose ownership values may conflict with the WSL), you look at last year's table & between them, those 9 clubs make up the top 9 places. Outside of that, it was Leicester, Brighton and Reading scraping along the bottom while some of the more historic women's teams - Yeovil, Doncaster Belles nowhere to be seen.

 

It does show the size of the task facing our women to just avoid relegation, and that the consequences of it might be more severe for the women than it is for the men.

I know Newcastle's manager and they are definitely taking it seriously now.  They've just won promotion to the third tier, have played at St James' Park three times including crowds of 28,000 and 24,000.  They have a target of Champions League football by 2027.  This has all started under the new regime - they weren't really part of the club under Mike Ashley.

 

So that will soon be another place taken up by one of the rich clubs of the men's game.

  • Sad 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Golden Fox said:

On a related note, Reading who we were pretty much level with all year, with them ending up relegated have just announced they are going from full time to part time as a result of their relegation https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/65820385

 

A sad state of the women's game that they just aren't able to compete financially.

 

When you take a step back and look at football clubs in this country, you have the rich 6, then in the next tier down, historically, you could put another 4 clubs there of West Ham, Newcastle, Villa, & Everton - clubs with bigger grounds and followings and pretty much mainstays of the top division in the men's game (could make an argument for Leeds in there, but still they haven't really recovered from their 2004 relegation).

 

With these clubs all now interested in the women's game (except Newcastle, whose ownership values may conflict with the WSL), you look at last year's table & between them, those 9 clubs make up the top 9 places. Outside of that, it was Leicester, Brighton and Reading scraping along the bottom while some of the more historic women's teams - Yeovil, Doncaster Belles nowhere to be seen.

 

It does show the size of the task facing our women to just avoid relegation, and that the consequences of it might be more severe for the women than it is for the men.

As I’ve said a few times it’ll end up if it hasn’t ready as a clone of the PL where outside of those top 6/7 it’ll be a case of trying to survive and little to no chance of winning a trophy.

 

I think that’ll be a major stumbling block to getting decent crowds and income for those outside the 6/7. How long will the men’s parent clubs continue pumping money in with little or no return. It must be costing KP  a lot of money to keep the team and Belvoir Drive for a struggling team.

  • Sad 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...