Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

Vestergaard

By moore_94, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

UHDrive

UHDrive

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, taupe said:

Well, again, I honestly don't see a big issue. Maybe Kasper was involved in getting Veste the gig but, again, the club would have respected Kasper's opinion. At worst, it was Kasper's bad and the club was naive. They'd not be the first employer to take someone on on the recommendation of an employee. Tbh, I think maybe the club panicked a little and perhaps rushed its own usual due diligence. 

They probably did panic. But me as a long term supporter would be hacked off if the club were bypassing core principles of recruitment and scouting over "references from mates" even if they come from long term legends.

  • Like 1
Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, taupe said:

Well, again, I honestly don't see a big issue. Maybe Kasper was involved in getting Veste the gig but, again, the club would have respected Kasper's opinion. At worst, it was Kasper's bad and the club was naive. They'd not be the first employer to take someone on on the recommendation of an employee. Tbh, I think maybe the club panicked a little and perhaps rushed its own usual due diligence. 

 

1 minute ago, UHDrive said:

They probably did panic. But me as a long term supporter would be hacked off if the club were bypassing core principles of recruitment and scouting over "references from mates" even if they come from long term legends.

we had been linked with him over multiple different windows. he had always been an option for us. We were even keen before he went to southampton. He could well have come in instead of bennett as well. 

 

He may not have been a top choice but for whatever reason he had always been on our lists as an option. Kasper may have been used as a character reference but nothing more 

  • Like 1
taupe

taupe

Posted
Posted (edited)
Quote

But me as a long term supporter would be hacked off if the club were bypassing core principles of recruitment and scouting over "references from mates" even if they come from long term legends.

 

Yes, I get that. I know where you're coming from.

Edited by taupe
  • Like 1
Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Godfrey off injured for Everton, bound to start a bidding war with Fulham for Vestergaard

 

Right?

Was thinking the same. Ideal great big lummox for Everton.

urban.spaceman

urban.spaceman

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Godfrey off injured for Everton, bound to start a bidding war with Fulham for Vestergaard

 

Right?

Suze is already on the phone to Moshiri asking if he wants to panic buy our panic buy from last year.

  • Haha 1
justfoxes

justfoxes

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

Suze is already on the phone to Moshiri asking if he wants to panic buy our panic buy from last year.

Panic buy don’t be silly we looked at him for ages 🤔😉

He’s a snip at £80m he’s the new Harry Maguire solid at the back never makes a mistake and takes out everything that comes anywhere near the defence, also he scores loads of goals from set pieces as his height is well spottable from a set piece every free kick & corner takers target in it goes bang he scores what else would you need in a quality defensive gem of a find at such a low price ??  😉🤔:ph34r:

TommyK

TommyK

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, NewEnglandFox said:

Figured he would be here until at least Fofana's future is decided. For cover.

 

So a little surprised by the murmur that Fulham have agreed.

Why? He didn't play last season when we literally had no center backs? Get rid as soon as. 

  • Like 2
AmarteyAndChill

AmarteyAndChill

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, NewEnglandFox said:

Squads usually carry 10 defenders. Bertrand and Ricardo hurt. Without Vesty makes 7. We don't have a 2nd choice back 4 without bringing in Albrighton at RB.

Wouldn’t want him playing even if we had 0 defenders. I’d have; Fofana, Evans, amartey, Ndidi, Soyuncu all ahead of him. So he’s 6th choice on probably like 50k p/W, joke 

  • Like 1
Mint_Fox

Mint_Fox

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Micky said:

He hasn't worked in our system but he is a very good player in the right system. He hasn't played in the premier league and represented a strong national team being an awful player. 

You need to have more about you, than only being able to play in one system. Unless you are exceptional and he isn't. 

MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, HarryDee8 said:

Aren't we covered in CB area. We've got fofana and Evans and Soyuncu as cover? If need be ndidi and amartey as 4th backup 


 

if you are going to include Ndidi it’s only fair to include Hamza!

Matt

Matt

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mint_Fox said:

You need to have more about you, than only being able to play in one system. Unless you are exceptional and he isn't. 

Granted and accepted point.

 

However, likewise, the style, should be adaptable to get the best out of what's available, at times last season, we were desperate, alot of excuse made for our situations  - people will say it wasn't excuses, it was just circumstances of which they'd be right, the reason I call them excuses is not once did we try and adapt to play different ways to help our situations, make the best and get the best out of what was available.

  • Like 1
  • Popular Post
Ian Nacho

Ian Nacho

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
Just now, Vlad the Fox said:

First season without a Dane in the squad for 11 years :(

Is Iversen the Brazilian we’ve been after then? 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Vlad the Fox

Vlad the Fox

Posted
Posted
Just now, Ian Nacho said:

Is Iversen the Brazilian we’ve been after then? 

Ha ha I knew I’d missed something obvious and someone was going to correct me. He’s going out on loan lol :ph34r:

 

#ITK lol 

Mint_Fox

Mint_Fox

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Matt said:

Granted and accepted point.

 

However, likewise, the style, should be adaptable to get the best out of what's available, at times last season, we were desperate, alot of excuse made for our situations  - people will say it wasn't excuses, it was just circumstances of which they'd be right, the reason I call them excuses is not once did we try and adapt to play different ways to help our situations, make the best and get the best out of what was available.

BR is stubborn,  but it just makes you question why buy him in the first place. He was a very square peg in a round hole. He never fitted the brief. 

  • Thanks 1
UHDrive

UHDrive

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, NewEnglandFox said:

Squads usually carry 10 defenders. Bertrand and Ricardo hurt. Without Vesty makes 7. We don't have a 2nd choice back 4 without bringing in Albrighton at RB.

Definitely hurts to have Bertrand.

  • Like 2
NewEnglandFox

NewEnglandFox

Posted
Posted

I'm not saying he's not garbage. I'm saying it's easy to spite sell someone and that cover is more complicated than looking at simply who can play CB. It's who is now playing LB/RB, who is now cover at those positions, and if you really want to bring NDIDI back who his playing there as well.

Phenom

Phenom

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, NewEnglandFox said:

I'm not saying he's not garbage. I'm saying it's easy to spite sell someone and that cover is more complicated than looking at simply who can play CB. It's who is now playing LB/RB, who is now cover at those positions, and if you really want to bring NDIDI back who his playing there as well.

Keeping deadwood that we don’t trust doesn’t really solve that, though.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...