Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

hirst is a huge confidence player. You’ve got to be willing to give him time but when he clicks he’s some player.

 

glad ipswich are doing just that 

Posted (edited)

Todays Results - Saturday 18th March

 

Championship:

 

Hamza Choudhury (suspended) - Watford 1-1 Wigan

 

League One:

 

George Hirst (7.6 + 1 goal - 74 mins) - Ipswich 2-0 Shrewsbury

 

League Two:

 

Jakub Stolarczyk (6.6 - 90 mins) - Hartlepool 2-2 Bradford

 

Ben Nelson (5.9 - 90 mins) - Doncaster Rovers 1-3 Salford

 

Kasey McAteer (6.1 - 45 mins) - Wimbledon 0-1 Crawley

 

Josh Eppiah (injured) - Northampton 1-0 Crewe

Edited by moore_94
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

Todays Game - Sunday 19th March

 

La Liga:

 

Ayoze Perez - starting for Real Betis (5th) vs Mallorca (11th)

 

Belgian Pro League:

 

Nathan Opoku - on the bench for Leuven (11th) vs Anderlecht (10th)

Edited by moore_94
  • Like 1
Posted

Todays Results - Sunday 19th March

 

La Liga:

 

Ayoze Perez (7.9 + MOTM - 69 mins) - Real Betis 1-0 Mallorca

 

Belgian Pro League:

 

Nathan Opoku (6.0 - 13 mins) - Leuven 0-2 Anderlecht

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Todays Games - Saturday 25th March

 

League Two:

 

Kasey McAteer - starting for Wimbledon (17th) vs Barrow (10th)

 

Jakub Stolarczyk - starting for Hartlepool (23rd) vs Leyton Orient (1st)

  • Like 2
Posted

Todays Results - Saturday 25th March

 

League Two:

 

Kasey McAteer (6.7 - 83 mins) - Wimbledon 1-2 Barrow

 

Jakub Stolarczyk (6.0 - 90 mins) - Hartlepool 1-1 Leyton Orient

  • Like 3
Posted
4 hours ago, moore_94 said:

Todays Results - Saturday 25th March

 

League Two:

 

Kasey McAteer (6.7 - 83 mins) - Wimbledon 1-2 Barrow

 

Jakub Stolarczyk (6.0 - 90 mins) - Hartlepool 1-1 Leyton Orient

I was at Barrow v Wimbledon today & didn’t notice our Kasey was playing until 10  or so minutes in. He was one of the poorer players in a poor team. I can only assume the score of 6.7 was given by his mum?

 

Just for @Ric Flair’s scrapbook, he played as a left-footed right winger. He just didn’t do it well. I’m struggling to see even championship potential here. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Steve Earle said:

I was at Barrow v Wimbledon today & didn’t notice our Kasey was playing until 10  or so minutes in. He was one of the poorer players in a poor team. I can only assume the score of 6.7 was given by his mum?

 

Just for @Ric Flair’s scrapbook, he played as a left-footed right winger. He just didn’t do it well. I’m struggling to see even championship potential here. 

...what is the point in playing him in that position!!!

  Whoever there manager is, he is not using him right. Central midfield on the left would be a more settled position where he plays. He has a tendency to spot opportunities and takes advantage of it, loves to attack an opponents backline from deep. 

  If that is where he has been playing on loan, then we might as well terminate the agreement. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Steve Earle said:

I was at Barrow v Wimbledon today & didn’t notice our Kasey was playing until 10  or so minutes in. He was one of the poorer players in a poor team. I can only assume the score of 6.7 was given by his mum?

 

Just for @Ric Flair’s scrapbook, he played as a left-footed right winger. He just didn’t do it well. I’m struggling to see even championship potential here. 

What I can't get my head around was why players such as Mcateer and Brunt were given so many opportunities with the first team when we had a plethora of talent such as Alves, Braybrooke and even Maswanhise and Madivadua that from the outside looked the more exciting prospects that deserved more integration into the first team IMO.

 

At the time I think many of us were like "Well Rodgers sees these players up close so we need to trust him" but it looks like it's another bizarre decision to add to Rodgers' list of poor/strange decisions. 

 

I'd imagine it'll be do with these players being lap dogs and buying into Rodgers Brendan Ball philosophy - that'll get you promoted over having raw talent and ability I'd guess....

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Collymore said:

What I can't get my head around was why players such as Mcateer and Brunt were given so many opportunities with the first team when we had a plethora of talent such as Alves, Braybrooke and even Maswanhise and Madivadua that from the outside looked the more exciting prospects that deserved more integration into the first team IMO.

 

At the time I think many of us were like "Well Rodgers sees these players up close so we need to trust him" but it looks like it's another bizarre decision to add to Rodgers' list of poor/strange decisions. 

 

I'd imagine it'll be do with these players being lap dogs and buying into Rodgers Brendan Ball philosophy - that'll get you promoted over having raw talent and ability I'd guess....

 

Brunt has played 225 minutes for the first team, Mcateer has played 107 minutes.

 

Braybrooke has played 16 minutes and Alves 15 minutes.

 

Let just brush over the fact both Alves 17, Braybrooke 19 are both at least 2 years younger then Brunt and Mcateer.

 

They both were just starting to get first team opportunities as they both got season ending injuries.

 

The other two Madivadua, Maswanhise haven't exactly been ripping it up in the under 21.

 

Rodgers is probably done here but just making up random stuff to beat him with is just pointless.

 

If you point was he doesn't give youth enough chance in general fair enough. 

 

But to make out Brunt and Mcateer must be lap dogs is just a bit strange.

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

 

Brunt has played 225 minutes for the first team, Mcateer has played 107 minutes.

 

Braybrooke has played 16 minutes and Alves 15 minutes.

 

Let just brush over the fact both Alves 17, Braybrooke 19 are both at least 2 years younger then Brunt and Mcateer.

 

They both were just starting to get first team opportunities as they both got season ending injuries.

 

The other two Madivadua, Maswanhise haven't exactly been ripping it up in the under 21.

 

Rodgers is probably done here but just making up random stuff to beat him with is just pointless.

 

If you point was he doesn't give youth enough chance in general fair enough. 

 

But to make out Brunt and Mcateer must be lap dogs is just a bit strange.

hmm not sure thats what he’s doing.  Seems a fair assessment to me. 

 

Im fully in agreeement that rodgers has no eye for talent. Vontae daley-campbell another absolutely talentless lad that got an opportunity here. leshabela another of his favourites… despite clearly not being up to much. 

 

I think you almost need to hand feed him the players, if he’s picking who he wants from the youth teams … no wonder the wrong ones are getting chances 

 

 

Edited by Lambert09
Posted
34 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

hmm not sure thats what he’s doing.  Seems a fair assessment to me

 

Im fully in agreeement that rodgers has no eye for talent. Vontae daley-campbell another absolutely talentless lad that got an opportunity here. leshabela another of his favourites… despite clearly not being up to much. 

 

I think you almost need to hand feed him the players, if he’s picking who he wants from the youth teams … no wonder the wrong ones are getting chances 

 

 

It's is when you say why is this person getting more opportunities when they have played about a game more in minutes, oh it must be because they are BR lap dogs.

 

Same Leshabela who has played 9 first team minutes under Rodgers, gone on then how is he a favourite?

 

A fair assessment would be he doesn't give youth a chance.

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

It's is when you say why is this person getting more opportunities when they have played about a game more in minutes, oh it must be because they are BR lap dogs.

 

Same Leshabela who has played 9 first team minutes under Rodgers, gone on then how is he a favourite?

 

A fair assessment would be he doesn't give youth a chance.

 

 

 

So why were those two given quite a lot of opportunity without particularly standing out?

 

The only reason I can think of is that they must have displayed a good understanding of Brendan's tactics and went the extra mile to show him that.

 

If you can give an explanation to why else they were there then please do...

 

They certainly weren't there because of tearing it up in the development team, if anything, some people were scratching their heads as it was a pretty bizarre selection. 

 

You also mention Alves cameo in your previous post. Was that when Brendan threatened to sub him for getting the fans on their feet and get excited when he went on and owned some Premier League defenders? 

 

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Collymore said:

So why were those two given quite a lot of opportunity without particularly standing out?

Age, maturity.

20 minutes ago, Collymore said:

The only reason I can think of is that they must have displayed a good understanding of Brendan's tactics and went the extra mile to show him that.

But that's not what you said, you said they must be BR lap dogs.

20 minutes ago, Collymore said:

If you can give an explanation to why else they were there then please do...

 

They certainly weren't there because of tearing it up in the development team, if anything, some people were scratching their heads as it was a pretty bizarre selection. 

They have played less the a couple games worth minutes, it's not like they have played 5 or 6 games.

 

20 minutes ago, Collymore said:

You also mention Alves cameo in your previous post. Was that when Brendan threatened to sub him for getting the fans on their feet and get excited when he went on and owned some Premier League defenders? 

You creating a narrative that not there, he was talking about taking less touches.

Posted
4 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Age, maturity.

But that's not what you said, you said they must be BR lap dogs.

They have played less the a couple games worth minutes, it's not like they have played 5 or 6 games.

 

You creating a narrative that not there, he was talking about taking less touches.

Yeah but you are dodging the big question as to why these two were selected. Age maturity  isn't a valid answer.

 

This conversation has come about by a poster going to watch Mcateer playing in L2 and him not particularly doing much. This was a player that Rodgers promoted. 

 

It doesn't make sense. 

 

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Collymore said:

Yeah but you are dodging the big question as to why these two were selected. Age maturity  isn't a valid answer.

 

This conversation has come about by a poster going to watch Mcateer playing in L2 and him not particularly doing much. This was a player that Rodgers promoted. 

 

It doesn't make sense. 

 

You have haven't answered why Leshabela is a favourite?

 

Promoted to what? About 4 or 5 players have trained consistently witht the first team.

 

Age, maturity is important because you have to up to the physical aspect. 

 

Some people like Rooney are physical up to playing at 17, 18 other aren't.

 

I still think without Alves and Braybrooke being injured they would have had more opportunities this season.

 

Once again Macteer has only play 80 minutes more in the first team then those, hardly being given loads of opportunities.

 

Brunt has done OK in the 200 minutes he has played.

 

I think you looking for something that isn't there.

 

BR doesn't play youth enough, but saying Brunt and Mcateer only got a chance being they are lap dogs is just odd.

 

 

 

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted
25 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

You have haven't answered why Leshabela is a favourite?

 

Promoted to what? About 4 or 5 players have trained consistently witht the first team.

 

Age, maturity is important because you have to up to the physical aspect. 

 

Some people like Rooney are physical up to playing at 17, 18 other aren't.

 

I still think without Alves and Braybrooke being injured they would have had more opportunities this season.

 

Once again Macteer has only play 80 minutes more in the first team then those, hardly being given loads of opportunities.

 

Brunt has done OK in the 200 minutes he has played.

 

I think you looking for something that isn't there.

 

BR doesn't play youth enough, but saying Brunt and Mcateer only got a chance being they are lap dogs is just odd.

 

 

 

I rest my case. 

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...