Leicester 4-0 Nottingham Forest - 3 things we learned

[Get Carter]

Here's my verdict on the key things to take from Monday night's victory

 

https://foxesofleicester.com/2022/10/05/leicester-city-nffc-3-things-learned/

 

Thoughts?

[Vacamion]

 

I've commented on this before, but Jeez, you keep doing it.

 

You could easily have put all 3 points on one page, but, no, that would have reduced your ability to gave us another "click here for more" beadcrumbs page, festooned with adverts and pop-ups and stuff getting in the way of what you actually wrote.   

 

Almost unusable and certainly difficult to read.

 

Next time, maybe just post what you have to say *directly in here*, rather than trying to lead us to click on your awfully over-monetised site which makes Leicestershire Live look like the Gutenberg Bible.

 

 

 

[Foxxed]

I’ve not read it.
 

You can keep your advertising and tracking. I’m sure Google’s algorithm already knows I like Leicester city and find pornography abhorrent.
 

But I’ll go with it:

 

Maddison good

Faes good

Forest bad

[stripeyfox]

10 hours ago, Get Carter said:

Here's my verdict on the key things to take from Monday night's victory

 

https://foxesofleicester.com/2022/10/05/leicester-city-nffc-3-things-learned/

 

Thoughts?

website practically unusable as @Vacamion says. Only clicked it to see how bad!

 

Just summarise here and do us all a favour

 

[Fox92]

9 minutes ago, stripeyfox said:

website practically unusable as @Vacamion says. Only clicked it to see how bad!

 

Just summarise here and do us all a favour

 

I highly doubt he has designed and created the website.

 

It's just a verdict of the game.

Edited 6 October 2022 by Fox92

[sm1]

Not read the article but my 3 takes are, Maddison best English central midfielder, our defence is still wide open regardless of personnel and Forest will get relegated. 

[dmayne7]

7 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

I highly doubt he has designed and created the website.

 

It's just a verdict of the game.

But he chose that platform. I haven't clicked on it as I did last time and it was awful. Surely you create a Leicester blog because you want to talk about Leicester first and foremost, not because you want to make money (that should be an added bonus).

 

A bit like almost every successful YouTuber who always say you need to focus on content you enjoy making and then the money will come, not the other way around.

[ClaphamFox]

1. Forest are horrendous

2. Faes may turn out to be exactly what we needed

3. Although his job remains in serious peril, Rodgers doesn't appear to have lost the dressing room yet

[norwichfox]

not followed the link...for reasons similar to those posted above.

[Aus Fox]

1. Forest are in a far worse position than us.

2. Maddison is the most creative English player in the league and needs to go to the World Cup

3. Wes Morgan is a blue

[Get Carter]

6 hours ago, Vacamion said:

 

I've commented on this before, but Jeez, you keep doing it.

 

You could easily have put all 3 points on one page, but, no, that would have reduced your ability to gave us another "click here for more" beadcrumbs page, festooned with adverts and pop-ups and stuff getting in the way of what you actually wrote.   

 

Almost unusable and certainly difficult to read.

 

Next time, maybe just post what you have to say *directly in here*, rather than trying to lead us to click on your awfully over-monetised site which makes Leicestershire Live look like the Gutenberg Bible.

 

 

 

I'm sorry i completely disagree, after reading it on my mobile with one pop up and 2 clicks to navigate through the pages.

 

just so you know, i don't design the page. i merely produce the content. I would rather it be all in one page without extra clicks but thats out of my control. As an enthusiastic writer who just does it mainly for the love i rely on the goodwill of fellow Leicester City fans just engaging with the content i have written and sparking debate. i admittedly get a tiny, measley amount of money from it at best so would appreciate you not trying to hammer it so as to put off other readers to the work i've written, especially when your argument lacks credibility. I've taken on your comments and have sent the feedback onto our chief's in charge. But please have some respect for writers in all this, from me to the people at thisisleicestershire and so on.

 

Personally i don't think the pages are that bad for anyone who has an iota of patience.

 

But its far easier to criticise someone than to engage with their work.

 

✌️ 

[Get Carter]

6 hours ago, Fox92 said:

I highly doubt he has designed and created the website.

 

It's just a verdict of the game.

correct. and i don't even think its that bad. This person has a bee in their bonnet for some reason

[dynamark]

We won.I couldnt get to sleep when I got home ,and my mate has lost the tickets he gave us.

[StanSP]

21 minutes ago, Get Carter said:

But its far easier to criticise someone than to engage with their work.

Technically, not all engagements have to be positive. 

 

Take it as constructive criticism, if you will. 

 

You've created content, but to the users reading it it's not that user-friendly or accessible. Can you try providing your content on a different website or platform, so that users don't have to evade or dodge so many distractions and the content is already there, instead of it being 3 separate pages? 

 

Take it as feedback as opposed to someone getting at you personally. 

[whoareyaaa]

18 hours ago, Get Carter said:

Here's my verdict on the key things to take from Monday night's victory

 

https://foxesofleicester.com/2022/10/05/leicester-city-nffc-3-things-learned/

 

Thoughts?

Good read, I wouldn't refer to Maddison as Madders though sounds a bit shit other than that it read pretty well.

 

Site wasn't an issue for me although I reject all so less loading/ads and im on a fast pc so no issues.

[Get Carter]

44 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

Good read, I wouldn't refer to Maddison as Madders though sounds a bit shit other than that it read pretty well.

 

Site wasn't an issue for me although I reject all so less loading/ads and im on a fast pc so no issues.

Cheers, thats a good point, i tend to reject cookies and ads as much as possible

[Vacamion]

3 hours ago, Get Carter said:

 

I'm sorry i completely disagree, after reading it on my mobile with one pop up and 2 clicks to navigate through the pages.

 

just so you know, i don't design the page. i merely produce the content. I would rather it be all in one page without extra clicks but thats out of my control. As an enthusiastic writer who just does it mainly for the love i rely on the goodwill of fellow Leicester City fans just engaging with the content i have written and sparking debate. i admittedly get a tiny, measley amount of money from it at best so would appreciate you not trying to hammer it so as to put off other readers to the work i've written, especially when your argument lacks credibility. I've taken on your comments and have sent the feedback onto our chief's in charge. But please have some respect for writers in all this, from me to the people at thisisleicestershire and so on.

 

Personally i don't think the pages are that bad for anyone who has an iota of patience.

 

But its far easier to criticise someone than to engage with their work.

 

✌️

 

Oh Bravo, that's the spirit, why don't you slag people off - that'll definitely attract new and sympathetic readers. 

 

If you really, genuinely, truthfully just wanted to "spark debate" as you suggested was the case, you could have simply posted your opinions directly into this very discussion forum and we could have debated them. 

 

But no, you wanted clicks.  

 

Whoops - there's me offering critical opinion and, Lordy, you made it clear that DON'T APPRECIATE my comments.  

 

Well, tough cheeses, Jesus, but maybe my "iota of patience" was exhausted by some dude coming into this forum, asking us to click his link to:

 

www.fairlyunoriginalcontentmadeworsebycrappywebsite.com

 

and then getting shirty when someone has the temerity to offer an actual opinion in a discussion forum.

 

And no, you are quite wrong, it isn't "far easier to criticise" someone. Not if you do it to my very high standard. 

 

Bonsoir...

 

 

[lifted*fox]

in this thread: people not using ad blockers in 2022

[FoxinNotts]

Forest get battered everywhere they go