Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
lcfcbluearmy

Rodgers in or OUT!

By lcfcbluearmy, in Leicester City Forum

Rodgers in or OUT?   

545 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Rodgers be sacked?

    • Yes
      522
    • No
      20

Recommended Posts

trabuch

trabuch

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Filberts Treat said:

Brendan have a foxes talk account?

14 apparently. (although I pretty sure he wants to be sacked. But that may be giving him too much credit - if he doesn't want to be sacked he is a very very poor manager indeed).

Edited by trabuch
jmono84

jmono84

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, foxfanazer said:

Who are the 'banter 10'?

 

Brendan

Brendans wife

Brendans dog

Top

Maddison

.......

 

 

Those guys would have voted out! BR’s been trying his best to get his payoff.

ConnFoxUS

ConnFoxUS

Posted
Posted

This poll establishes that there are 15 (as of the time of this comment) people who either have terrible reading comprehension skills, or should not be left alone due to their clear, severe mental illness. 

  • Haha 1
Jattdogg

Jattdogg

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, ConnFoxUS said:

This poll establishes that there are 15 (as of the time of this comment) people who either have terrible reading comprehension skills, or should not be left alone due to their clear, severe mental illness. 

Or just having a laugh and choosing to annoy others lol.

 

Edited by Jattdogg
Tom12345

Tom12345

Posted
Posted (edited)

The team we had sent out there yesterday should have comfortably win.

 

Again, after scoring, we started to “control” the game. I don’t know how many times we commit this error although at the time of winning, many fans likewise supported the idea of game management and/or winning no matter the style and now have turned back into talking about “weak” mentality etc. It is ironically the same thing. We have to keep playing our game to win.

 

Our defensive problem is also with Rodgers’ set up. He relies a lot on the full backs going up field for width (except for Barnes who is too one dimensional). When they are upfield, we are exposed at the back and one mistake (such as the one Faes made leading to the first goal) can cost us a goal because we are too thin. This is also ironic because of Rodgers’ focus on defence and control. 

 

When we are pressing high and trying to play positively, at least our opponent is pushed at their end trying to defend. We are not too bad at that and we can score goals. But as soon as we try to “game manage” and try to f.king pass around at the back and be in that comfort zone, we invite the opposition towards our half and one mistake can lead to us being significantly exposed, particularly as our full backs are often further up from our backline.

 

So we either have to continue to play our positive way or not play with our full backs going up field and play with a more traditional 442 if we want to defend better. We are often in a half way house when we game manage as our formation and tactics are simply incompatible and crap.

 

Also, when Ndidi is available and (no doubt be) picked by Rodgers, the problem is compounded as his inability to help his teammates while in possession puts us under more pressure.

 

When we get into our shell to defend leads, our lone striker becomes useless. We see time and time again we just defend without a clue how to advance forward into opposition half other than hoofing it - even when we are down and chasing. When we are all attacking, at least our lone striker has support, when we try to defend from 10th minute like yesterday, then our lone striker just becomes a headless chicken running around.  We would be better off with 2 strikers playing that way and play 442 because at least the full backs can stay back and help properly defend, while we can have some teeth at the top with two strikers. This is where we can bring in Nacho as well as he is top quality criminally wasted on the bench by Rodgers.

 

Finally and most importantly, Rodgers’ conservatism is a disease in the mind. Confidence destroying and weak.

 

Rodgers out. He is clueless.

Edited by Tom12345
  • Like 1
J. James

J. James

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, maynefox said:

I voted in. 

 

No particular reason, just want to watch the world burn kinda thing

I voted out

Very particular reason, just want to watch the fraud burn kinda thing

  • Haha 1
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted

Pointless voting on FT.  It is tantamount to trying to remove Putin.  Rogers is firmly in control and taking us down to the Championship. The Club´s board are lacking the funds and the balls to remove him. 

 

Yesterday was yet another embarrassment to the Club and it´s fans.  The people running this Club deserve what´s coming. 

  • Sad 1
Beachyboy

Beachyboy

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, ARTY_FOX said:

Sean dyche... solskjaer.... Dean Smith..... have we really fallen that low? 

I'd love Dyche, inject a bit of personality back into the club Rogers speaks a lot about it but possesses little, it's like listening to a robot.

Matt

Matt

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

People gonna vote with their feet yet or just continue with the ‘blue M ong’ mentality of supporting the club regardless? 

 

I pretty much didn't go to the 2nd half of last season because I had to take a step away from it all but I started going back start of the season as I believed the end was near, I don't think we're any closer to the end now as we were then.

 

I'm in a situation where I desperately don't want to go to games, vote with my feet and send the message to the board that way but I doubt others would follow in that kind of protest, people just seem to love blindly happy clapping.

 

On the other hand i've said ahead of almost every home game this season I expect it to get toxic, it's not, nowhere near, I wanna be there to witness when it gets toxic, i've said my piece, many times, i've tried to get Rodgers out chants started, many times, but the happy clappers just sit there and look at you in disgust.

 

I'm damned if I do, damned if I don't.

 

I'm not sure our fanbase has it in them to send messages to the board.

 

I swear our fanbase weren't far off chanting "Brendan Rodgers Blue n' White Army" on Monday night.

  • Like 4
The Year Of The Fox

The Year Of The Fox

Posted
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Matt said:

 

I pretty much didn't go to the 2nd half of last season because I had to take a step away from it all but I started going back start of the season as I believed the end was near, I don't think we're any closer to the end now as we were then.

 

I'm in a situation where I desperately don't want to go to games, vote with my feet and send the message to the board that way but I doubt others would follow in that kind of protest, people just seem to love blindly happy clapping.

 

On the other hand i've said ahead of almost every home game this season I expect it to get toxic, it's not, nowhere near, I wanna be there to witness when it gets toxic, i've said my piece, many times, i've tried to get Rodgers out chants started, many times, but the happy clappers just sit there and look at you in disgust.

 

I'm damned if I do, damned if I don't.

 

I'm not sure our fanbase has it in them to send messages to the board.

 

I swear our fanbase weren't far off chanting "Brendan Rodgers Blue n' White Army" on Monday night.

I’ve packed in going since the Liverpool game in December 

 

I did turn up on Monday, as I’d decided to sod my opinion on the cancerous cnut and get behind the boys. However, I can’t. I don’t and won’t stand by thinks I don’t believe in. 

 

We all knew Monday was a one off though really. There were enough cracks in that performance to show a better side would have exploited them.

 

The end has to be near for him. We are truly truly in a relegation fight and will certainly go down if he’s still here in the New Year

 

A lot of our fans are wet flannels. Won’t vote with their feet. Thinking they’re superior for going to the games still whilst taking the p*ss out of those who refuse.

Well you’re fooling yourselves. **** them all until that poison tw*t has left 

Edited by The Year Of The Fox
  • Like 3
chapero82

chapero82

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

I’ve packed in going since the Liverpool game in December 

 

I did turn up on Monday, as I’d decided to sod my opinion on the cancerous cnut and get behind the boys. However, I can’t. I don’t and won’t stand by thinks I don’t believe in. 

 

We all knew Monday was a one off though really. There were enough cracks in that performance to show a better side would have exploited them.

 

The end has to be near for him. We are truly truly in a relegation fight and will certainly go down if he’s still here in the New Year

 

A lot of our fans are wet flannels. Won’t vote with their feet. Thinking they’re superior for going to the games still whilst taking the p*ss out of those who refuse.

Well you’re fooling yourselves. **** them all until that poison tw*t has left 

I’m not going back until he’s sacked 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
ARTY_FOX

ARTY_FOX

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Beachyboy said:

I'd love Dyche, inject a bit of personality back into the club Rogers speaks a lot about it but possesses little, it's like listening to a robot.

It would he a terrible appointment. 

 

It won't be dyche anyway. 

Guest Col city fan

Guest Col city fan

Posted
Posted

Who on earth have voted ‘in’?

Thats your choice but what’s your rationale?

suffolk fox

suffolk fox

Posted
Posted

Have to admit was in the Rogers in crowd thought he deserved time after the FA cup and charity shield wins.

 

Now however, something has to change, given our freefall predicament.  Therefore he has to go.  Out for me.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...