Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, lcfcsnow said:

If he was anywhere close he'd have been involved against Birmingham, not going to suddenly appear for a league fixture.

Yeah no doubt you're right. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, lcfcsnow said:

If he was anywhere close he'd have been involved against Birmingham, not going to suddenly appear for a league fixture.

not if the play was for him to be involved tonight, the weekend is probably more likely but I wouldn't rule tonight out

Posted
22 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Really pleasing to see him make the bench yesterday. Hopefully on there for Tuesday too and gets a chance to come on. Will set him up nicely to score the winner at Elland Road in a few weeks.

 

 

Got a feeling we would have seen him yesterday if we hadn't had that moment.

  • Like 4
Posted
57 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Got a feeling we would have seen him yesterday if we hadn't had that moment.

Yeah I think you're right, probably would have come on instead of Stephy.

  • Like 2
Posted
55 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Yeah I think you're right, probably would have come on instead of Stephy.

Prob more likely to come on instead of Hamza but seeing how nervy it was we went for the more defensive option. 

Posted

With Vestergaard and Souttar likely available for Tuesday and Iheanacho expected back imminently, sub spots taken up by academy players is going to be less likely. 

 

Hope he gets a chance.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

With Vestergaard and Souttar likely available for Tuesday and Iheanacho expected back imminently, sub spots taken up by academy players is going to be less likely. 

 

Hope he gets a chance.

Which is mad considering the whole argument for having a sh*t load of subs was to see more opportunities for academy players.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

With Vestergaard and Souttar likely available for Tuesday and Iheanacho expected back imminently, sub spots taken up by academy players is going to be less likely. 

 

Hope he gets a chance.

I don't know Enzo has been pretty good at giving them a chance.

 

I wouldn't be surprised to see Nelson keep he's place on the bench.

 

He's also name check Alves a few times so he will get minutes at some point.

 

Has to take he's opportunity when he gets it, Enzo is brave effort to play him over Praet if he starts well.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, filbertway said:

Which is mad considering the whole argument for having a sh*t load of subs was to see more opportunities for academy players.

I know, but for example when Vestergaard is back, we'll have Stolarczyk, 3 defenders on the bench from Coady, Nelson, Doyle and Souttar, 3 midfielders from Hamza, Akgün, McAteer, Alves and 2 of Vardy, Cannon, Iheanacho.

 

We've such a ridiculous squad but unavailability has enabled plenty of academy players to be included this season, one advantage of our injuries 😂

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

I know, but for example when Vestergaard is back, we'll have Stolarczyk, 3 defenders on the bench from Coady, Nelson, Doyle and Souttar, 3 midfielders from Hamza, Akgün, McAteer, Alves and 2 of Vardy, Cannon, Iheanacho.

 

We've such a ridiculous squad but unavailability has enabled plenty of academy players to be included this season, one advantage of our injuries 😂

 

 

I pretty sure Enzo said in an interview he probably only needs one striker on the bench recently unless I'm misremembering/ misunderstood  ut yes problems with having a big squad means possibly less time for youngsters but Enzo has been pretty good at it so far

Posted
18 minutes ago, lcfcbluearmy said:

I pretty sure Enzo said in an interview he probably only needs one striker on the bench recently unless I'm misremembering/ misunderstood  ut yes problems with having a big squad means possibly less time for youngsters but Enzo has been pretty good at it so far

Cannot see him leaving Cannon and Iheanacho off the bench. In fact it's going to be pretty interesting what he does from next weekend onwards. 

 

I do think Cannon's at risk of falling down the pecking order despite his future being the least up in the air and if it is then what was the point in paying quite a sizeable fee for him.

 

I really think he needed to be given much more game time to prove he could step up, but he's got such incredible competition around him.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Cannot see him leaving Cannon and Iheanacho off the bench. In fact it's going to be pretty interesting what he does from next weekend onwards. 

 

I do think Cannon's at risk of falling down the pecking order despite his future being the least up in the air and if it is then what was the point in paying quite a sizeable fee for him.

 

I really think he needed to be given much more game time to prove he could step up, but he's got such incredible competition around him.

I think it's more likely Iheanacho doesn't make the squad. It's more than likely he won't be here next season, so would seem pointless picking him in the squad over Cannon who will be here next season. He won't drop Vardy if he's fit and Daka has been our best striker of late. Add in the fact that Iheanacho has been honking for most of this season and I just don't see him making the squad unless we get an injury to one of the other 3. 

 

Edit: apologies, I've become one of those people who is talking about a subject totally irrelevant to the thread. Think I'll head over to the Iheanacho thread now and talk about Will Alves. 

Edited by jayfox26
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Cannot see him leaving Cannon and Iheanacho off the bench. In fact it's going to be pretty interesting what he does from next weekend onwards. 

 

I do think Cannon's at risk of falling down the pecking order despite his future being the least up in the air and if it is then what was the point in paying quite a sizeable fee for him.

 

I really think he needed to be given much more game time to prove he could step up, but he's got such incredible competition around him.

Surely we also have to learn from experience…Enzo has never tried a double striker.

but he has seen what injuries or loss of form does.

Cannon,Daka,Vardy,Alves are a must for the future,because we havea.ways had injuries,Vardy is our headliner but at best 3 seasons longer,where we need then

Alves,Cannon,Daka Mcateer to compete for bragging rights along those 3 seasons and after.

At present along those lines, and FFP baggage I don’t see where we need to spend

money next season on a CF…

Fatawu a priority,then descision on Akgun and or Praet…but then seeing we can invest in MF and defence..

Posted
1 hour ago, fuchsntf said:

Surely we also have to learn from experience…Enzo has never tried a double striker.

but he has seen what injuries or loss of form does.

Cannon,Daka,Vardy,Alves are a must for the future,because we havea.ways had injuries,Vardy is our headliner but at best 3 seasons longer,where we need then

Alves,Cannon,Daka Mcateer to compete for bragging rights along those 3 seasons and after.

At present along those lines, and FFP baggage I don’t see where we need to spend

money next season on a CF…

Fatawu a priority,then descision on Akgun and or Praet…but then seeing we can invest in MF and defence..

We have tried the double striker. It's happened in more than one game this season. 

 

QPR off the top of my head, albeit Vardy and Iheanacho were on the pitch together for about 5 minutes. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, Ashley said:

We have tried the double striker. It's happened in more than one game this season. 

 

QPR off the top of my head, albeit Vardy and Iheanacho were on the pitch together for about 5 minutes. 

I think it may have been one other game Ashley.  That sort of says it all. The system is paramount. Trust the process. They were down to ten men - hence we could play an extra attacker. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Ashley said:

We have tried the double striker. It's happened in more than one game this season. 

 

QPR off the top of my head, albeit Vardy and Iheanacho were on the pitch together for about 5 minutes. 

 

3 hours ago, st albans fox said:

I think it may have been one other game Ashley.  That sort of says it all. The system is paramount. Trust the process. They were down to ten men - hence we could play an extra attacker. 

I meant set up and start with intent a double striker….

Not from subs bench which create a different mind-thought.and testing players

adaptability in new set up.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, fuchsntf said:

 

I meant set up and start with intent a double striker….

Not from subs bench which create a different mind-thought.and testing players

adaptability in new set up.

I don’t see it happening for some time and probably not at all  - if we are done and dusted with a few games to spare then he may try some formations but I’d think more likely he tries players in his favoured set up to see if they can adapt to different positions (think wilf as an 8) rather than playing two strikers as you’d expect.  Infact, I’d think more likely to see him experiment with untried formations like 4-1-3-2 where the full back inverts to make the 3 into a 4 and other new fangled set ups rather than standard two up top.  He’s a thinker 

Posted

I'd be really interested to see him given a shot against Bournemouth too.

 

Alex Scott is the level of career trajectory he needs to aspire to be reaching so would be great to see them both on the pitch. 

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, fuchsntf said:

 

I meant set up and start with intent a double striker….

Not from subs bench which create a different mind-thought.and testing players

adaptability in new set up.

Why would Enzo completely change his tactics and system? He won't. No decent teams play 2 strikers anymore, the goals and attack threat tends to come from wingers at the best teams. 

Edited by jayfox26
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, jayfox26 said:

Why would Enzo completely change his tactics and system? He won't. No decent teams play 2 strikers anymore, the goals and attack threat tends to come from wingers at the best teams. 

Man City play with two up front, or at least Alvarez just behind Haaland

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...