Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Will1981

Mads Hermansen

By Will1981, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

don_danbury

don_danbury

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

 

Someone definitely replied to me once saying Jakub was his equal, and there were a few who alluded to us 'being fine' if we just put Stolarczyk in – but I don't think I've ever seen anyone claim he's better.

probably the same person/people who wanted that bum from germany that we signed  to replace kasper

Edited by don_danbury
  • Popular Post
Deeg67

Deeg67

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Stolarczyzk looked very good in the limited opportunities he got with the first team, especially as a shot-stopper. Mads is obviously off to a strong start but if Jakob got an extended run, who’s to say. It’d be a nice problem to have.

  • Like 8
  • Popular Post
EastAnglianFox

EastAnglianFox

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
1 hour ago, CrazyKopCorner said:

This lad could be better than Kasper as he's more orthodox - I said that a while ago 

 

He should be our next £30+ sale out of the door - Absolute mustard 


More like 60+ million

 

That Onana at Man Utd cost 50 odd million and he’s 27 years old

 

Mads is only 24 and is twice the keeper

  • Like 6
Deeg67

Deeg67

Posted
Posted

I still think Mads’ distribution is a tad inconsistent. That was exposed last season when we dominated possession and always played out of the back; not so much in the PL where we’re panic defending most of the time and hoofing it long. That might make him a little bit of a tougher sell to the really elite sides, who prioritize a keeper’s ball skills above everything else.

  • Like 1
  • Popular Post
Tommy Fresh

Tommy Fresh

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
17 minutes ago, Deeg67 said:

I still think Mads’ distribution is a tad inconsistent. That was exposed last season when we dominated possession and always played out of the back; not so much in the PL where we’re panic defending most of the time and hoofing it long. That might make him a little bit of a tougher sell to the really elite sides, who prioritize a keeper’s ball skills above everything else.

We signed him for his distribution, if you want a keeper to do it and take those risks they will get caught out from time to time

  • Like 10
Chelmofox

Chelmofox

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Deeg67 said:

I still think Mads’ distribution is a tad inconsistent. That was exposed last season when we dominated possession and always played out of the back; not so much in the PL where we’re panic defending most of the time and hoofing it long. That might make him a little bit of a tougher sell to the really elite sides, who prioritize a keeper’s ball skills above everything else.

The best get caught out. Every manager who plays this talks about risk/reward. Mads is top notch with his feet and shows little fear in difficult situations or when he gets it’s wrong. In a possession heavy PL side, he will be the absolute nuts. 

  • Like 3
BillyFOX12

BillyFOX12

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Deeg67 said:

I still think Mads’ distribution is a tad inconsistent. That was exposed last season when we dominated possession and always played out of the back; not so much in the PL where we’re panic defending most of the time and hoofing it long. That might make him a little bit of a tougher sell to the really elite sides, who prioritize a keeper’s ball skills above everything else.

His distribution against Arsenal was pretty poor, but I’m not sure it would have mattered much with how Cooper set us up. Plus, he was getting absolutely peppered in goal.

Deeg67

Deeg67

Posted
Posted

He’s overall pretty good with his feet and at our level, it’s not an issue. But if you want to start talking about 60 million for a keeper, the few sides that would pay that are going to prioritize distribution above all else. Generally they play the better “11th field player” as their first choice keeper over the better shot-stopper.

filbertway

filbertway

Posted
Posted

He's very comfortable on the ball, sometimes makes the wrong decision but he's still young. Ederson and Allison who come under much less pressure still make errors, it's part of being asked to play like an outfield player. He can be slow do make decisions when the ball is coming into the box which has got him in trouble a fair few times as well.

 

Liverpool, Man City, Arsenal and likely Chelsea will definitely be eyeing him up as a potential long term solution. If they can crack the decision making they'll have a top quality keeper for 8-9 years.

VLC86

VLC86

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Deeg67 said:

I still think Mads’ distribution is a tad inconsistent. That was exposed last season when we dominated possession and always played out of the back; not so much in the PL where we’re panic defending most of the time and hoofing it long. That might make him a little bit of a tougher sell to the really elite sides, who prioritize a keeper’s ball skills above everything else.

He’s a very young keeper, there won’t be many keepers as good as him at shot stopping and his feet in the world.

 

If I’m a big team looking for a long term keeper, there aren’t many better.

JimJams

JimJams

Posted
Posted

New contract, £60mill buyout clause, relegation reduction to £40mill. Chelsea or Mancs to pay. Maybe even Arsenal, we'll see how it all pans out. 

With the Rutter fee, that works out given a keeper can stay for 10+ years.

Corky

Corky

Posted
Posted
On 02/10/2024 at 21:02, Libertine said:

Apparently Mads is going to be on the next episode of Golf Life, Tubes from Soccer AM's Youtube show, if anyone is interested. 

Is it one question only?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...