Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Foxmeister

Dewsbury-Hall

By Foxmeister, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
19 minutes ago, funkyrobot said:

They’ve had our pants down for £30m. I’d say a good £10m under value. He’s our best player, he had 3 years left on his contract. These fcukers paid £100m for Caicedo. They’ve taken advantage of the terrible mismanagement at LCFC and the PSR deadline.
 

KDH is a great lad, one of our own and I certainly wish him well unlike when they took BenChilwell and Fofana. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see him back in a LCFC shirt again in the future. 

Disagree, he’s nowhere near the quality Caicedo was for Brighton. He didn’t pull up any trees in the premier league, he’s a solid player but he’s not worth any more than £30m in my opinion, not enough in his game to justify it. I’m a bit surprised he’s gone to Chelsea if I’m being honest, can’t see where he fits in there. This is a good deal for us, a genuine talent they didn’t want to sell us, and we’ve got £30m towards PRS. 
 

The fact he’s home grown I think has naturally given us a bias opinion of him, but I genuinely don’t think he’s that good, he’s a solid steady player, but his attitude makes up for his slightly scrappy game. 

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1
z-layrex

z-layrex

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Number 6 said:

It's weird that they keep going for it despite not having much success with signings from us.

It's to keep us down and it's worked a treat.

ajthefox

ajthefox

Posted
Posted

Disappointed he's leaving but obviously it's been on the cards.


I think the value is a little low and it is a strange one for Chelsea, I wish him the best but can't see him being a regular.

Steve Earle

Steve Earle

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Ted Maul said:

Stayed last season, was our best player and helped get us out of what would have been years of transfer embargoes and points deductions in the second tier. That's enough to warrant a lot of respect from us, at the very least.

No lack of respect here I assure you. I just don’t think he’s all that. 
Winks, Ricardo, Vestergaard & Mads were all, for me, as good or better than KDH last season. 

  • Like 2
justfoxes

justfoxes

Posted
Posted

Bent over and Shafted by scum sucking pond life Chelsea again £30m whatever happened to the £40m valuation hope these fuching idiots have inserted a decent sell on clause in the deal but knowing our lot probably not !!

 

gurru991

gurru991

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, moore_94 said:

At least it looks like we have actually done the incoming transfer from Chelsea smartly if true - £4m and 4 year deal for Michael Golding

 

https://www.footballinsider247.com/leicester-city-agree-deal-to-sign-chelsea-star-michael-golding-sources/

If this is true, then it's a fantastic deal for Leicester . He is a very highly rated England international who with Braybrooke & Alves would give us an amazing potential in midfield.

  • Like 1
  • Popular Post
Babylon

Babylon

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
46 minutes ago, funkyrobot said:

They’ve had our pants down for £30m. I’d say a good £10m under value. He’s our best player, he had 3 years left on his contract. These fcukers paid £100m for Caicedo. They’ve taken advantage of the terrible mismanagement at LCFC and the PSR deadline.
 

KDH is a great lad, one of our own and I certainly wish him well unlike when they took BenChilwell and Fofana. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see him back in a LCFC shirt again in the future. 

He’s only worth £40m if someone is willing to pay for it. They aren’t and he’s done nothing to warrant anyone paying £40m.

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
  • Popular Post
Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
25 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

Disagree, he’s nowhere near the quality Caicedo was for Brighton. He didn’t pull up any trees in the premier league, he’s a solid player but he’s not worth any more than £30m in my opinion, not enough in his game to justify it. I’m a bit surprised he’s gone to Chelsea if I’m being honest, can’t see where he fits in there. This is a good deal for us, a genuine talent they didn’t want to sell us, and we’ve got £30m towards PRS. 
 

The fact he’s home grown I think has naturally given us a bias opinion of him, but I genuinely don’t think he’s that good, he’s a solid steady player, but his attitude makes up for his slightly scrappy game. 

 

My favourite bit is gonna be when we sell Michael Golding back to them for 60m

  • Like 1
  • Haha 9
gurru991

gurru991

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, funkyrobot said:

They’ve had our pants down for £30m. I’d say a good £10m under value. He’s our best player, he had 3 years left on his contract. These fcukers paid £100m for Caicedo. They’ve taken advantage of the terrible mismanagement at LCFC and the PSR deadline.
 

KDH is a great lad, one of our own and I certainly wish him well unlike when they took BenChilwell and Fofana. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see him back in a LCFC shirt again in the future. 

We haven't seen the second part of the deal which will happen in August to facilitate FFP. There will be a player coming in from Chelsea & that is what will make or break the deal. If it's Michael Golding then we have done very, very well !!

Tom12345

Tom12345

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, moore_94 said:

At least it looks like we have actually done the incoming transfer from Chelsea smartly if true - £4m and 4 year deal for Michael Golding

 

https://www.footballinsider247.com/leicester-city-agree-deal-to-sign-chelsea-star-michael-golding-sources/

Only 4 years for a talent who is only 18? Rudkin at it again. Just like Tielemans, 4 years is perfect to give away him for free in a few years’ time. With relatively low wages it is often worth the small risk to sign them for 5 or even 6 years. 

  • Popular Post
Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tom12345 said:

Only 4 years for a talent who is only 18? Rudkin at it again. Just like Tielemans, 4 years is perfect to give away him for free in a few years’ time. With relatively low wages it is often worth the small risk to sign them for 5 or even 6 years. 

That’s just moaning for the sake of it. lol 

  • Like 8
JimJams

JimJams

Posted
Posted

Yeah. If we gave him 5 years and he turned out shit he'd be getting pelters for offering him that length of contract.

 

If he's decent in the first one or two seasons, we extend.

  • Like 3
Xen

Xen

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, JimJams said:

Yeah. If we gave him 5 years and he turned out shit he'd be getting pelters for offering him that length of contract.

 

If he's decent in the first one or two seasons, we extend.

18 year old lad so won't be on a huge wage either, you'd've thought. If all goes well then it'll be easy enough to increase an offer and extend without too much pushback (or cash in for £££)

gurru991

gurru991

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, FLAN said:

So this lad is 18. Are we expecting him to be a starter?

I fully expect Cooper to use him off the bench. One thing about Cooper is that he has never been scared to give a player a chance.

cityfanlee23

cityfanlee23

Posted
Posted

£30m is a fair price for him, a central midfielder with no right foot. 
Absolutely incredible season for us in the Championship, but I still think he will be found out in the prem if he's playing an advanced role, so many times this season he turned himself into trouble, or completely broke down our attack with multiple clear passing options because he didn't want to use his right. 
He's a likeable player and clearly loves the club, but if this gets us over the line financially I'll take it. Not quite sure where or how he fits into the Chelsea squad but good luck to him. 

  • Like 3
Foxmeister

Foxmeister

Posted
  • Author
Posted
34 minutes ago, Tom12345 said:

Only 4 years for a talent who is only 18? Rudkin at it again. Just like Tielemans, 4 years is perfect to give away him for free in a few years’ time. With relatively low wages it is often worth the small risk to sign them for 5 or even 6 years. 

Why would it work for him to be tied to low wages for 6 years?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...