Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Happy Fox

Managerial Replacements

By Happy Fox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Mickyblueeyes

Mickyblueeyes

Posted
Posted

It’s an attractive post for a number of managers. Despite the FFP situation. 
 

We are losing our entire coaching team, a real opportunity to stamp your mark on a club and a DOF who is more than willing to be led. 

  • Like 1
Tomlcfc133

Tomlcfc133

Posted
Posted

I’m all on board for Carlos now!! great coach… especially after failing at Olympiakos and coming back stronger at West Brom. Feels like he’s ready for a big job now

  • Haha 1
ClaphamFox

ClaphamFox

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Tomlcfc133 said:

I’m all on board for Carlos now!! great coach… especially after failing at Olympiakos and coming back stronger at West Brom. Feels like he’s ready for a big job now

Did you watch West Brom in their two play-off semifinals against Southampton? They were awful in both.

  • Like 4
  • Popular Post
jv1

jv1

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

If moyes wants it it’s a complete no brainer- cannot understand the hate for him - was superb at West Ham - had them top half for how many years - competing in Europe - made some decent signings like kudos - proven solid premier league manager with bags of knowledge and experience and let’s be honest our situation is pretty unique and not great - he would stand the best chance of keeping us up compared to a complete novice with zero prem experience like corberan or even maresca dare I say - I’d have moyes all day long 

Edited by jv1
  • Like 6
  • Thanks 3
hackneyfox

hackneyfox

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, the draper said:

Peak Rudkin 

 

They have known for over a week he is going and  it seems Rudkin has no one lined up or even scoped out 

 

 

You know this how?

  • Like 3
jv1

jv1

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, FOXYTALK said:

No way Potter or Moyes come here.

Need to be more realistic with our targets. 

Agree potter won’t take it but moyes 100% should do - straight back in - he didn’t want to leave West Ham - I think he would relish the challenge- we are a decent job and prem jobs at good clubs don’t come around every day 

Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, FOXYTALK said:

No way Potter or Moyes come here.

Need to be more realistic with our targets. 

If Moyes is an unattainable target, we may as well just sack everything off and fold. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
urban fox

urban fox

Posted
Posted

Not that I think he is a contender, but those touting cambiasso can kiss Vardy goodbye. No love lost there and can't see jv signing on if he was appointed.

  • Like 1
Bluetintedspecs

Bluetintedspecs

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PaulW said:

He wasn't twiddling his thumbs whilst an assistant at Man City!

Big difference  between being one of many 'assistants ' to the responsibilities of being the Manager, incomparable! 

  • Popular Post
Spudulike

Spudulike

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

The club should be hellbent on getting Moyes in. Not an exciting appointment but needs must. The least risky option. 

  • Like 11
volpeazzurro

volpeazzurro

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, urban fox said:

Not that I think he is a contender, but those touting cambiasso can kiss Vardy goodbye. No love lost there and can't see jv signing on if he was appointed.

My understanding was that was Vardy's initial feelings but he eventually bought into his approach which was after all, the right one. However, as Vardy isn't currently a player he doesn't come into the equation. 

 

Cambiasso is extremely doubtful and very left field but I'd sooner it be him than a good number of the others in the betting like Marsch, Wagner, Parker and Southgate etc!

  • Like 1
bovril

bovril

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, ARM1968 said:

Ruskin leaving voice message on Jose’s phone

John? I'd have thought Mourinho wasn't aesthetic enough for him.

  • Thanks 1
ClaphamFox

ClaphamFox

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

The club should be hellbent on getting Moyes in. Not an exciting appointment but needs must. The least risky option. 

The club won't go anywhere near Moyes. Maresca was appointed to play a particular style of football, as were Rodgers and Puel before him. Top wants us to play passing football, and we have assembled a squad that is designed to do exactly that. The plan was very much to continue playing that style in the PL. The plan is not going to change just because Enzo is no longer around to implement it - we will 100% be going for another manager who favours possession-based football. Moyes is not that manager so he is almost certain not to be considered.

Edited by ClaphamFox
  • Like 2
  • Sad 2
jv1

jv1

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

The club won't go anywhere near Moyes. Maresca was appointed to play a particular style of football, as were Rodgers and Puel before him. Top wants us to play passing football, and we have assembled a squad that is designed to do exactly that. The plan was very much to continue playing that style in the PL. The plan is not going to change just because Enzo is no longer around to implement it - we will 100% be going for another manager who favours that style. Moyes is not that manager so he is almost certain not to be considered.

West Ham were not long ball merchants in any way - played as much as most - and marescas style was nothing like bodgers or puel who played 433 with actual full backs - yes they tried to keep the ball but that’s as similar as it gets-  marescas style was completely unique and everything revolved around it - we aren’t going to play like that no matter who we get- also don’t agree we have assembled any squad to play that way at the next level - moyes would play as much as we could whilst making us harder to beat - marescas style at this level with our players would have been a complete disaster 

ClaphamFox

ClaphamFox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, jv1 said:

West Ham were not long ball merchants in any way - played as much as most - and marescas style was nothing like bodgers or puel who played 433 with actual full backs - yes they tried to keep the ball but that’s as similar as it gets-  marescas style was completely unique and everything revolved around it - we aren’t going to play like that no matter who we get- also don’t agree we have assembled any squad to play that way at the next level - moyes would play as much as we could whilst making us harder to beat - marescas style at this level with our players would have been a complete disaster 

Why?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...