Michael Golding

[AKCJ]

6 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

 

Hoping we've managed to scam Chelsea for £30m and we get to keep Lewis' brother.

[Nolucklcfc]

Good for future but where’s our actual replacement? 

[KFS]

This’ll be Glover won’t it

[Hitesh]

Also I guess in future years we'd potentially make a decent profit from him as well

[Tuna]

Completely underwhelming and unexciting

[Silva Fox]

1 minute ago, Hitesh said:

Also I guess in future years we'd potentially make a decent profit from him as well

Unless there's a buy-back clause for Chelsea!

[Dahnsouff]

2 minutes ago, Nolucklcfc said:

Good for future but where’s our actual replacement? 

Well, we have time to decide that, so assume this was just a minor bit of leverage to get a decent prospect as part of fragmented deal.

[Dahnsouff]

This is not KDH replacement.   

[foxfanazer]

Let me guess, they'll have a buy back clause in there as well

[StriderHiryu]

Very promising player but not really the first name on the list for a relegation battle. If we do get relegated, he’d be a real asset to get us back up. 
 

Of the players we were linked to from Chelsea, this one is pretty good. 

[HankMarvin]

26 minutes ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

His middle name is Heinz? Get him in

Sauce?

[StriderHiryu]

3 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

This is not KDH replacement.   

Exactly, it’s just to balance books. But the good thing is he has a lot of potential. Chelsea have a brilliant academy and so many players that leave still do great, see Livramento, Guehi, Tomori, Miley, etc. 

 

He’s a good signing but you’d expect him to be a squad option this season, playing a bigger role in the years to come. Way prefer this to Casadei who was a major disappointment in his time here. 

[Pliskin]

This lad a properly good. Cooper will likely know of him too considering his links with academy prospects. We’ve no business getting this type of player from Chelsea in all honesty, this is a better deal for us than KDH is for them. 

[moore_94]

Said it in the other thread but still... I think I much prefer us only having to buy a youth player from them (as long as the transfer fee isn't ridiculous) as it means we don't have to specifically pick one of their older players to buy who would have a higher fee and probably very big wages

[Nolucklcfc]

9 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Well, we have time to decide that, so assume this was just a minor bit of leverage to get a decent prospect as part of fragmented deal.

Always take the “rated highly by Chelsea” thing lightly too. If he was rated that highly, they wouldn’t let him go permanently. 

[Dahnsouff]

2 minutes ago, StriderHiryu said:

Exactly, it’s just to balance books. But the good thing is he has a lot of potential. Chelsea have a brilliant academy and so many players that leave still do great, see Livramento, Guehi, Tomori, Miley, etc. 

 

He’s a good signing but you’d expect him to be a squad option this season, playing a bigger role in the years to come. Way prefer this to Casadei who was a major disappointment in his time here. 

Exactly this. 

[Dahnsouff]

Just now, Nolucklcfc said:

Always take the “rated highly by Chelsea” thing lightly too. If he was rated that highly, they wouldn’t let him go permanently. 

The same Chelsea who let De Bruyne go? Chelsea are a madness and have a history of zero patience, also as @StriderHiryu said, better this than Casadei!

[fox_favourite]

4 minutes ago, StriderHiryu said:

Exactly, it’s just to balance books. But the good thing is he has a lot of potential. Chelsea have a brilliant academy and so many players that leave still do great, see Livramento, Guehi, Tomori, Miley, etc. 

 

He’s a good signing but you’d expect him to be a squad option this season, playing a bigger role in the years to come. Way prefer this to Casadei who was a major disappointment in his time here. 

I love most of your posts...you say what I can't articulate , this been one and I completely agree!

 

But the key is word is most 

[adam]

9 minutes ago, foxfanazer said:

Let me guess, they'll have a buy back clause in there as well

Yeah £500,000 knowing us.

[Guest Chocolate Teapot]

Potter nearly took the job because he was really impressed by glover so fingers crossed on this one.

[RyCleary]

Just now, Chocolate Teapot said:

Potter nearly took the job because he was really impressed by glover so fingers crossed on this one.

Can Glover just be our DoF?

[Lesta2014]

1 minute ago, Chocolate Teapot said:

Potter nearly took the job because he was really impressed by glover so fingers crossed on this one.

Didn’t glover sign some academy lads from big 6 at Southampton who turned out to be half decent? 

[JimJams]

9 minutes ago, Nolucklcfc said:

Always take the “rated highly by Chelsea” thing lightly too. If he was rated that highly, they wouldn’t let him go permanently. 

Boehly and co don't really seem to have a clue to be fair.

[JimJams]

3 minutes ago, Lesta2014 said:

Didn’t glover sign some academy lads from big 6 at Southampton who turned out to be half decent? 

I thought he signed a load of ones that turned out to be shit?  Like Bazunu.

[Wasyls Pec Deck]

24 minutes ago, KFS said:

This’ll be Glover won’t it

Cooper as well might know him with his knowledge of England youth set ups