Wymsey Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 Just now, HighPeakFox said: I will take no further interest in him, unless he somehow gets out. Wonder if he'll be in prison with other terrorists, or would that make it worse?
Guest Bilo Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 Just now, Sol thewall Bamba said: Blokes on prison wings up and down the country rubbing their hands together hoping he gets sent to their place. I'll give him a couple of months tops before a guard "forgets to lock a door" and he's in a body bag. There'll be a price on his head. Not that it'll be needed. Whoever does the necessary deed will be a legend overnight.
Free Falling Foxes Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 (edited) 30 minutes ago, PAULCFC said: Just watching the sentencing.......harrowing. Why concurrent and not consecutive terms for each offence? I know it's unlikely he'll be released in any case, but each of those child murders ought to have an individual sentence I believe and run consecutively. Edit: To answer my own question: I guess it is possible that if he should die within 52 years, it could be argued he didn't serve any punishment for the other crimes, hence the concurrent decision? Edited 23 January 2025 by Free Falling Foxes 2
Ian Nacho Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 I'm sure he'll be having a horrendous time of it in prison. I'll be surprised if he makes the 52 years without being killed.
Foxdiamond Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 7 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said: I'm not a fan of righteous vengeance. I would agree though this scumbag challenges this principle 2
Wymsey Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said: I'm sure he'll be having a horrendous time of it in prison. I'll be surprised if he makes the 52 years without being killed. He could even be placed on suicide-watch, but obviously that depends on his psychiatric history. Edited 23 January 2025 by Wymsey
Guest Bilo Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 1 minute ago, Wymsey said: He could even be placed on suicide-watch, but obviously that depends on his psychiatric history. I'd watch it.
st albans fox Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 15 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said: Blokes on prison wings up and down the country rubbing their hands together hoping he gets sent to their place. I'll give him a couple of months tops before a guard "forgets to lock a door" and he's in a body bag. That would be a shame no one should kill him - make sure he survives an extremely painful attack and suffers. Death is too good for that scumbag. Only problem with that is the cost to the state of his hospital treatment. so a really slow death then ? 1
PAULCFC Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 16 minutes ago, Free Falling Foxes said: Why concurrent and not consecutive terms for each offence? I know it's unlikely he'll be released in any case, but each of those child murders ought to have an individual sentence I believe and run consecutively. Edit: To answer my own question: I guess it is possible that if he should die within 52 years, it could be argued he didn't serve any punishment for the other crimes, hence the concurrent decision? Good point on the edit....never thought of it like that?Any legal Eagles here?
Mickyblueeyes Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 2 minutes ago, st albans fox said: That would be a shame no one should kill him - make sure he survives an extremely painful attack and suffers. Death is too good for that scumbag. Only problem with that is the cost to the state of his hospital treatment. so a really slow death then ? Stick a really big pole up his ass which makes it very difficult to move him. Save on hospital bills and painful. Charge people a pound a slap to raise a bit more for the prison service. Jeez, I’ve got my entrepreneurial hat on today. 2
ramboacdc Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 18 minutes ago, Wymsey said: He could even be placed on suicide-watch, but obviously that depends on his psychiatric history. How does it work if he is basically on hunger strike like he claims? Do they have to keep him alive? I thought force-feeding was illegal after The Troubles?
Guest TamworthFoxes Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 30 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said: I'm not a fan of righteous vengeance. I’m even less of a fan of murdering scum that could stab a 6 year old girl 122 times.
HighPeakFox Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 (edited) 6 minutes ago, TamworthFoxes said: I’m even less of a fan of murdering scum that could stab a 6 year old girl 122 times. I agree, but I find no joy in any of it, not even his potential demise. However, that's the lowest of low bars to measure against, don't you think? Edited 23 January 2025 by HighPeakFox 1
It'sblueupnorth Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 52 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said: Can I ask, why are we calling him Rwandan, wasn't he born in Britain and is a British citizen? Or am I wrong, and he has Rwandan citizenship? Because he’s a 2nd generation Rwandan immigrant? He probably doesn’t have Rwandan citizenship because his father was wanted for genocide there… 1
PAULCFC Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 6 minutes ago, ramboacdc said: How does it work if he is basically on hunger strike like he claims? Do they have to keep him alive? I thought force-feeding was illegal after The Troubles? I think he would have to offered food,but if he doesn't eat it's his choice......trouble is then he'd end up in a Hospital bed someone more deserving might get.
Popular Post Dr The Singh Posted 23 January 2025 Popular Post Posted 23 January 2025 1 minute ago, It'sblueupnorth said: Because he’s a 2nd generation Rwandan immigrant? He probably doesn’t have Rwandan citizenship because his father was wanted for genocide there… I'm 1st generation, so does that mean I'm not English, British? My.kids also?? How many generations do you have to be to be British? 3 3
Foxdiamond Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 1 minute ago, PAULCFC said: I think he would have to offered food,but if he doesn't eat it's his choice......trouble is then he'd end up in a Hospital bed someone more deserving might get. Should be pointed out to him he will be offered food but will not be removed to hospital if he refuses. 1
Guest Bilo Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 16 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said: Stick a really big pole up his ass which makes it very difficult to move him. Save on hospital bills and painful. Charge people a pound a slap to raise a bit more for the prison service. Jeez, I’ve got my entrepreneurial hat on today. PPV of the first night the prison officers turn a blind eye Friday night prime time. Order in a pizza, grab a beer and watch the viewing figures go through the roof.
Foxdiamond Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 1 minute ago, Dr The Singh said: I'm 1st generation, so does that mean I'm not English, British? My.kids also?? How many generations do you have to be to be British? You are definitely one of us I would say
HighPeakFox Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 6 minutes ago, It'sblueupnorth said: He probably doesn’t have Rwandan citizenship because his father was wanted for genocide there… Fact or unpleasant smear? 1
leicsmac Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 Just now, Foxdiamond said: You are definitely one of us I would say Sadly, that may well not be a universal opinion.
bovril Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 Struggling to come to terms with the barbarity of it.
bovril Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 1 minute ago, Foxdiamond said: You are definitely one of us I would say Just now, leicsmac said: Sadly, that may well not be a universal opinion. so maybe just take a day off from this stuff
Guest Bilo Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 Just now, HighPeakFox said: Fact or unpleasant smear? Bullshit from right-wing populists on X who also thought he was named 'Ali Goes to the Apartment' in Arabic, arrived on a small boat in June and then decided he was an Islamic convert when that turned out to be bollocks.
Robo61 Posted 23 January 2025 Posted 23 January 2025 37 minutes ago, Free Falling Foxes said: Why concurrent and not consecutive terms for each offence? I know it's unlikely he'll be released in any case, but each of those child murders ought to have an individual sentence I believe and run consecutively. Edit: To answer my own question: I guess it is possible that if he should die within 52 years, it could be argued he didn't serve any punishment for the other crimes, hence the concurrent decision? I don't see how it's even possible to serve consecutive life sentences.
Recommended Posts